Medical research reveals NovedexXT is a breakthrough in natural testosterone boosters

UnFuknPerro

0
Registered
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
77
For those of you that questioned the validity of Gaspari Nutrition's NovedexXT testosterone booster, the following are the published results of a medical research study



Ziegenfuss T.N., Mendel R.W., and Hofheins J.E.

Safety and Efficacy of a Commercially- Available, Naturally-Occurring, Aromatase Inhibitor in Healthy Men.

Ohio Research Group of Exercise Science and Sports Nutrition. Wadsworth, Ohio 44281, USA

Rationale: In healthy eugonadal men, it is known that blocking estrogen formation stimulates thehypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis to increase in vivo androgen production. Recently, a new class of dietary supplements has appeared that claim to inhibit the aromatase enzyme (i.e., decrease the transformation of aromatizable androgens [androstenedione, DHEA, testosterone] into estrogens [estriol, estrone, estradiol]), leading to an increase in androgen and testosterone formation. Purpose: As the first step in a series of experiments on a popular, over-the-counter aromatase inhibitor, the purpose of this pilot study was to examine the effects of Novedex XT(NOV-XT) administration on selected hormonal responses (total testosterone [TT], bioavailable testosterone [BT] and estradiol [E2]), as well as serum and plasma markers of renal, hepatic, andhematological function. Methods: Using an open-label, proof-of-concept design, five eugonadal men (mean ± SD age, height, weight, body fat: 31.0 ± 5.3 yr, 177.0 ± 3.8 cm, 86.6 ± 8.7 kg, 15.2 ± 54 %) ingested 4 capsules of NOV-XT prior to bed for 28 consecutive days. Ac= cording to themanufacturer, each capsule of NOV-XT contains 60 mg of a proprietary blend of three naturally-occurring aromatase inhibitors: 6, 17-keto-etiocholene-3-ol tetrahydropyranol ether, 3, 17-keto-etiochol-triene, and 3¹,5,7-trihydroxy-4¹-methoxyflavone (supplements were provided by an FDA-registered, pharmaceutically licensed manufacturer; confirmation by an external laboratory is pending). Blood samples obtained at baseline (prior to supplementation), and at weekly intervals thereafter for 28 days, were analyzed for TT, BT, and E2 by radioimmunometric and chemilluminetric assays. Subjects were required to maintain their normal dietary and training patterns during the study. All blood samples were obtained at the same time of day (0700-0900) to minimize diurnal variation. Hormone concentrations were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey¹s HSD post-hoc test. Dependent t-tests were used to compare changes in blood chemistries. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05. Results: Compared to baseline, NOV-XTadministration rapidly and significantly increased TT and BT. Mean changes from baseline for TT (Figure 1) after one, two, three, and four weeks of NOV-XT administration were: +145% (p<0.006), +183% (p<0.0005), +232% (p<0.0002), and +240% (p<0.0002), respectively. Meanchanges from baseline for BT (Figure 2) after one, two, three, and four weeks of NOV-XTadministration were: +300% (p<0.01), +402% (p<0.0009), +511% (p<0.0002), and +528% (p<0.0002), respectively. Despite these large increases in TT and BT, no significant aromatization to estradiol was observed (i.e., E2 concentrations remained 3-6 pg/mL below baseline at all timepoints). No statistically significant changes in clinical blood chemistries (fasting glucose, BUN, creatinine, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, albumin, globulin, CO2, total protein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, VLDL-cholesterol) or systemic hemodynamics (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) were observed, nor were any adverse events reported during the study.

Conclusions: Within the framework of the current experimental design, these preliminary data indicate that four weeks of NOV-XT administration significantly elevates serum TT and BT, likely via the inhibition of estradiol formation and the shifting of the HPT axis towards androgen/testosterone production. In healthy, eugonadal men, supplementation with NOV-XT does not appear to result in any deleterious effects on blood chemistry or systemic hemodynamics. Ongoing research is being conducted to confirm and refine these results in a larger sample size, aswell as examine the impact of NOV-XT on androgenic and estrogenic metabolites, bodycomposition, and muscular performance. Supported in part by a research grant from Gaspari Nutrition (Neptune, NJ).


http://www.gasparinutrition.com/products/anabolics/novedex_xt.asp
 

Attachments

  • NovedexXTResearch.jpg
    NovedexXTResearch.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 2
Journal???Who needs journals when you have "scientifc" proof? The word science proves that it works!!!
 
LambdaCalc said:
Journal???Who needs journals when you have "scientifc" proof? The word science proves that it works!!!

LOL!!!

Don't bust his balloon quite yet, LambdaCalc :)



UnFuknPerro,

Peer review is the first step in gaining credibility, so if it's not in a peer-reviewed journal, then it's just hand waving.
 
Priapologist said:
Peer review is the first step in gaining credibility, so if it's not in a peer-reviewed journal, then it's just hand waving.
I totally agree but alot of people have gotten very good results with Novedex and other similar supps like Rebound XT. In fact these products are becoming more and more common in Post Cycle Therapy with clomid/nolva... and for mild cycles, in lieu of clomid/nolva.
 
sikdogg said:
I totally agree but alot of people have gotten very good results with Novedex and other similar supps like Rebound XT. In fact these products are becoming more and more common in Post Cycle Therapy with clomid/nolva... and for mild cycles, in lieu of clomid/nolva.

Cool. Anecdotal evidence is good, but verified scientific evidence is better :)

The science behind aromatase inhibition is solid and the guys who did the study appear to be credible. However, it was industry funded, and that often raises questions of propriety. I will be especially interested in the results of the Baylor study, since Baylor is an established and respected university. I cannot say the same for the Ohio Research Group (who did the preceeding research).

Pri
 
The study is to be published in the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SPORTSNUTRITION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS - Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2(1):1-30, 2005 found here on page 28 of 29 http://www.sportsnutritionsociety.org/site/pdf/JISSN-2-1-1-30-05.pdf

Gaspari Nutrition is being commended by the industry, backing up their claims with proven research. The results of the study from Baylor University will rock the industry! The ability to raise testosterone levels over 400% while decreasing estrogen levels by over 50% with little to NO REPORTED side effects is simply amazing. Finally a company that has taken the extra steps to ensure consumers that are purchasing a valid, research backed supplement... that works!
 
UnFuknPerro said:
The study is to be published in the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SPORTSNUTRITION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS - Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2(1):1-30, 2005 found here on page 28 of 29 http://www.sportsnutritionsociety.org/site/pdf/JISSN-2-1-1-30-05.pdf

Gaspari Nutrition is being commended by the industry, backing up their claims with proven research. The results of the study from Baylor University will rock the industry! The ability to raise testosterone levels over 400% while decreasing estrogen levels by over 50% with little to NO REPORTED side effects is simply amazing. Finally a company that has taken the extra steps to ensure consumers that are purchasing a valid, research backed supplement... that works!

Okay, so it was a poster at a conference. That's barely one step above hand-waving, so don't count your chickens quite yet, UnFuknPerro. I would, at the very least, want to see the results of the Baylor study before I spent $47 + S&H on the stuff.
 
Priapologist said:
Okay, so it was a poster at a conference. That's barely one step above hand-waving, so don't count your chickens quite yet, UnFuknPerro. I would, at the very least, want to see the results of the Baylor study before I spent $47 + S&H on the stuff.

Not to take anything from you, but it is $32 plus S&H at bodybuilding.com
 
matts22 said:
Not to take anything from you, but it is $32 plus S&H at bodybuilding.com

No problem, matts22. I was just quoting the Gaspari website price. Doesn't really matter though, it's still more money than I would be willing to pay without solid verification of effect. Now, if they sold it for $5 at GNC..... :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom