Alright, over my time in being involved with the Penis Enlargement forums, I see people that do exclusively length oriented routines, and some do routines that are exclusively girth oriented, and the rest do a combination of both.
Also I've read that some people think it's best to go all-out for a length goal first, then tackle your girth goal (assuming both are unsatisfactory). This being because if you put on girth, it will we harder to make future length gains, due to it being much harder to stretch if you're thicker.
So what are all of your opinions on this? I personally think that it doesn't particularly matter what route you take, as long as you stick to a plan. I mean, Penis Enlargement generally takes a long bit of time to see truly significant results. This being said, how much difference will it all make in the end if you do a mixed routine as compared to a routine specifically geared to one aspect of Penis Enlargement (those being length or girth)? Will the time "saved" be significant, or will it even matter at all when all is said and done?
Any input into this is appreciated.
- d_s
Also I've read that some people think it's best to go all-out for a length goal first, then tackle your girth goal (assuming both are unsatisfactory). This being because if you put on girth, it will we harder to make future length gains, due to it being much harder to stretch if you're thicker.
So what are all of your opinions on this? I personally think that it doesn't particularly matter what route you take, as long as you stick to a plan. I mean, Penis Enlargement generally takes a long bit of time to see truly significant results. This being said, how much difference will it all make in the end if you do a mixed routine as compared to a routine specifically geared to one aspect of Penis Enlargement (those being length or girth)? Will the time "saved" be significant, or will it even matter at all when all is said and done?
Any input into this is appreciated.
- d_s