Initial View of TheGRIP vs BIB Starter

1

10inchadvantage

0
I have just started experimenting with the BIB hanger. Currently I am hanging my third 20 minute set at 2.5 lbs with the BIB starter. I hung the second set with TheGRIP vacuum hanger. I am hanging SD, laying on my bed.

There's not much of a difference that I can feel at this weight between the two, but I can tell that the areas of stress are somewhat different. The BIB is actually pulling the CC chambers themselves, whereas TheGRIP is pulling the outside layers (tunica) rather than actually gripping the chambers. It took me a little bit to figure out the difference between the two pulls, so they seem to have related pulls. However, the thing about the BIB is that I can actually feel my CC chambers delightfully tingling as they are actually getting pulled in the stretch, whereas with TheGRIP it seems that the internal part (septum) and the outer tunica take the brunt of the pull.
 
BTC stands for between the cheeks, and is there any thread where those many acronyms are provided with a description so I'm aware of all of those ?

I for instance don't know what SD stands for.

I know or rather guess that OTS stands for over the shoulder.

I'd like to know about those since angle is a factor when hanging.
 
10inchadvantage said:
I have just started experimenting with the BIB hanger. Currently I am hanging my third 20 minute set at 2.5 lbs with the BIB starter. I hung the second set with TheGRIP vacuum hanger. I am hanging SD, laying on my bed.

There's not much of a difference that I can feel at this weight between the two, but I can tell that the areas of stress are somewhat different. The BIB is actually pulling the CC chambers themselves, whereas TheGRIP is pulling the outside layers (tunica) rather than actually gripping the chambers. It took me a little bit to figure out the difference between the two pulls, so they seem to have related pulls. However, the thing about the BIB is that I can actually feel my CC chambers delightfully tingling as they are actually getting pulled in the stretch, whereas with TheGRIP it seems that the internal part (septum) and the outer tunica take the brunt of the pull.
Click to expand...
How do you think the gripping differences will effect gains?
 
longstretch said:
How do you think the gripping differences will effect gains?
Click to expand...

Well it doesn't matter what I think, it matters what I actually gain. I could say "well since the BIB is literally pulling the chambers I'd gain faster," but there's no way I can confirm that.
 
Well, my flaccid is hanging much better now that I've started lightly hanging. What's odd is that it seems that my flaccid girth has increased about .25" ever since I started using the BIB. I'm having a lot of fun doing this light Penis Enlargement stuff.
 
10inchadvantage said:
Well, my flaccid is hanging much better now that I've started lightly hanging. What's odd is that it seems that my flaccid girth has increased about .25" ever since I started using the BIB. I'm having a lot of fun doing this light Penis Enlargement stuff.
Click to expand...
My erect girth increased about 0.25" from the 6 months I used the Bib Starter. I just couldn't take the pain that came along with using it after I got up to 15 pounds...
 
It is odd to me that no one has conjectured that it is the immediate force the Bib applies to the CCs which result in the girth gains so many Bib users testify to. That is, not only are these tissues lengthed, their capacity to expand and accept blood is also increased.
 
jqsderrida said:
It is odd to me that no one has conjectured that it is the immediate force the Bib applies to the CCs which result in the girth gains so many Bib users testify to. That is, not only are these tissues lengthed, their capacity to expand and accept blood is also increased.
Click to expand...

Although an early BIB user, I'd agree with your statement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top