do fat people have fatter penises on average?

I actually think so. The bodymass has something at least to do with the penis. People who got very pumped bodies with muscles are probably those with the fattest penises.
 
I don't see how this would be true. The penis doesn't have fat pockets and the muscle is smooth. I'm thinking if this were true we'd be hearing about "the one benefit from getting fat!".
 
penis has no fat, meaning no correlation. i used to think that it could be related to bodytype so that an endomorphic kinda guy would be thicker but thats most likely rubbish too
 
Hey guys. Fatter people do not have fatter dicks. If anything being fat would hinder penis size because of blood flow being needed to support more body mass leaving the penis at the back of the bus for blood flow. Not to mention being over weight will hinder your NBPenis EnlargementL size.
 
The penis has very little fat and a fatter person would benefit nothing over a thinner person. As some stated, much of the penis length is lost in the fat pad at the base of the penis. If a fatter person meant a fatter penis I think our planet would be populated by overweight men with chodes:)
 
All other things being equal (and in addition to decreased NBPenis EnlargementL), I would think that overweight men would have somewhat smaller measurements if their condition is due to a lack of exercise. Cardiovascular fitness does play a part in maximizing size.
 
Big Al;375647 said:
All other things being equal (and in addition to decreased NBPenis EnlargementL), I would think that overweight men would have somewhat smaller measurements if their condition is due to a lack of exercise. Cardiovascular fitness does play a part in maximizing size.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Diet and exercise play a huge roll in blood flow, weight plays a huge roll in non-bone-pressed legnth.
 
kingsnake;375610 said:
If anything being fat would hinder penis size because of blood flow being needed to support more body mass leaving the penis at the back of the bus for blood flow.
Click to expand...
The Circulatory System is just that: circulatory. Blood doesn't make choices as to where to go. It goes everywhere, all the time. The only differences can be had when the smooth vascular muscle changes the size the vessels.
 
I will answer your question straight head on. No fat men don't have fatter dicks on average. A fatter person is more unhealthy, so they would have (Likely) poorer blood flow around the body and possibly high cholesterol , blood pressure and even diabetes which will also affect how things go on down below, not for the better either.

The fatter person will have a larger fat pad which will hide a percentage of the penis from the naked eye. Lastly, the penis has ZERO fat on it .. the penis is fat free, the skin that covers it doesn't have fat pockets and is very thin. Its essentially a large external valve, like those the heart has but with other obvious differences.

Leaner guys would have a larger penis than the fat guy ONLY because the fat pad wouldn't be around and the obvious increased circulation, which they should have being healthy.
 
Hey Red. I agree. Blood flow will go more to where it's needed. An example is say you do 100 pushups. After you finish the 100 pushups you will have a good blood pump in your chest and arms. This is because more blood is needed to the chest and arms for the demands placed on the them from the pushups. When you go for a 2 mile run I garentee you that your flaccid penis will be a lot smaller then normal because more blood flow is needed for the arms and legs to support the demands of the 2 mile run. When you are over weight in bodyfat or lean muscle tissue your body has to bring about blood to all areas even the extra unnessary weight such as bodyfat or lean tissue. When you are in good cardiovascular shape and are not over weight you will find that your penis will be at its biggest with good EQ.
 
Last edited:
Yep and it sucks when I've done one of those gruelling runs in the gym on the treadmill, once I get changed my size has shrunk. All that blood goes to the vital organs, what a wonder our bodies are.
 
Well, the fat persons had sufficient nutrients and the skinny ones obviously not.

So the fat persons penis had BETTer surrondings for growing.

Actually that applies for any person with over weight compared to people with under weight.

Well, how to build a hosue without materials? Similar case...
 
Last edited:
newbie09;375669 said:
Well, the fat persons had sufficient nutrients and the skinny ones obviously not.

So the fat persons penis had BETTer surrondings for growing.

Actually that applies for any person with over weight compared to people with under weight.

Well, how to build a hosue without materials? Similar case...
Click to expand...

Don't think so dude. Bad analogy.

A HEALTHY person would have sufficient nutrients. A fat person obviously has a lazy lifestyle or high intake of bad foods, eating more doesnt equate to more nutrients.
Likewise, a skinny person may have a very active lifestyle, hence the skinniness. They could also have a high metabolism, so they might indeed be getting enough nutrients.

Fat people = Smaller penises. As far as girth is concerned, I agree with everyone else, EQ would be down as a result of weight, cholesterol and other crap.

Lose some weight fatties :P
 
newbie09;375669 said:
Well, the fat persons had sufficient nutrients and the skinny ones obviously not.

So the fat persons penis had BETTer surrondings for growing.

Actually that applies for any person with over weight compared to people with under weight.

Well, how to build a hosue without materials? Similar case...
Click to expand...

Biggest load of bullshit I've read in sometime, thanks for that. I think chubby chops would only have the advantage over the garden rake if they were in the middle of nowhere and had no food or anything, than Fatty's body would start consuming all that crap he has inside while the knitting needle would just fade away to a skeleton but to say chubs has growth potential is pathetic, don't know what they teach in your country but hope the doctors don't come here to practice.
 
SInce it is proofen that nutrional deficites can stunt physical development it would apply on that too, because natural penis growth belongs to physical development.

Just check out most of the girls with A Cups... When they got curvy in their teens they started starving and so that happened and that is why many girls today look like 2-3 years younger as they are. Since guys are starving to show their six pack while hiding their bone thick arms there is a similar issue. I know such a guy... Started smoking quite early when he smoked too much he wasn't getting hungry anymore et voila in the mid 20s he is like a teen.

So either genetic reproduction occurs different with the different pair of cromosomes or something is wrong here...

So much about bullshit.

Since underweight is an indicator for deficites that would apply.

The human body isn't as stupid as most people think. if healthy it takes care of everything in order of priority --> vital functions like cardio vascular functionality would get their nutrients first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top