nicobocabitch said:What makes it sound like he did it on purpose?
Just the way u described it thats all. I didn't mean he cut himself i thought maybe he was upset and punched the window. As men we have all been there u know "punching something u know"nicobocabitch said:And actually I believe most of his body went through the glass Payne.
What makes it sound like he did it on purpose?
The BTC Killer said:...DLD, I support you no matter what...
What have you done for the P.E. community lately?endokrin said:Which would mean you support him even if this whole Alpha Blade thing is a scam, etc. Even if he came out and admitted the setbacks were false... By your own admission, you would still support him.
Wow.
The BTC Killer said:What have you done for the P.E. community lately?
Socratic MethodGhosting said:A question cant be answered with a question. Thats merely an attempt to deflect (not answer the question) the question.
Ghosting said:A question cant be answered with a question. Thats merely an attempt to deflect (not answer the question) the question.
nicobocabitch said:Yaa i was just doing a background check on him.
nicobocabitch said:IMO by not answering the ? he answered it.
Not that it needed answering anyway.
Ghosting said:To discredit him? Character assasination? I think he had a valid question, yet you seem intent on harassing anyone everytime anyone questions anything. Thats like a blind follower. I dont want to see DLD hurt as much as the next guy, but your attitude is disturbing. Am I the only person who can remain objective? Your responses say you want to turn things ugly as soon as anyone drops a question.
nicobocabitch said:No after looking into his bacround i can see he is regesterd under more than one name that he almost never posts which tells me he is probably a troll.
It's MaX-Vac by the way, and I'm saying DLD is bigger than DLD. He is M.O.S., he is Alphablade. We all are. Making a interrogatory remark of what if it's a scam, or he lied is irrelevant. DLD doesn't EXPenis EnlargementCT anyone to do anything, but we put the expectations all on him. It doesn't seem balanced. So, what have you done for the P.E. community has nothing to do with me. It is directed at the ones who expect, demand, and irrationalize.Ghosting said:Umm, saying "what have you done for the Penis Enlargement community" was not a direct answer to his question. It was saying, "since I invented the Vax-Max, I care more for the Penis Enlargement community, and therefor dont need to justify my response." So I see, anyone who invents something cares more. I gotcha.
The BTC Killer said:Socratic Method
The oldest, and still the most powerful, teaching tactic for fostering
critical thinking is Socratic teaching. In Socratic teaching we focus on
giving students questions, not answers. We model an inquiring, probing mind
by continually probing into the subject with questions. Fortunately, the
abilities we gain by focusing on the elements of reasoning in a disciplined
and self-assessing way, and the logical relationships that result from such
disciplined thought, prepare us for Socratic questioning.
Thankfully, there is a predictable set of relationships that hold for all
subjects and disciplines. This is given in the general logic of reasoning,
since every subject has been developed by those who had:
* shared goals and objectives (which defined the subject focus)
* shared questions and problems (whose solution they pursued)
* shared information and data (which they used as an empirical basis)
* shared modes of interpreting or judging that information
* shared specialized concepts and ideas (which they used to help them
organize their data)
* shared key assumptions (that gave them a basis from which to
collectively begin)
* a shared point of view (which enabled them to pursue common goals from
a common framework)
Each of the elements represents a dimension into which one can delve in
questioning a person. We can question goals and purposes. We can probe into
the nature of the question, problem, or issue that is on the floor. We can
inquire into whether or not we have relevant data and information. We can
consider alternative interpretations of the data and information. We can
analyze key concepts and ideas. We can question assumptions being made. We
can ask students to trace out the implications and consequences of what they
are saying. We can consider alternative points of view. All of these, and
more, are the proper focus of the Socratic questioner.
As a tactic and approach, Socratic questioning is a highly disciplined
process. The Socratic questioner acts as the logical equivalent of the inner
critical voice which the mind develops when it develops critical thinking
abilities. The contributions from the members of the class are like so many
thoughts in the mind. All of the thoughts must be dealt with and they must
be dealt with carefully and fairly. By following up all answers with further
questions, and by selecting questions which advance the discussion, the
Socratic questioner forces the class to think in a disciplined,
intellectually responsible manner, while yet continually aiding the students
by posing facilitating questions.
A Socratic questioner should:
a) keep the discussion focused
b) keep the discussion intellectually responsible
c) stimulate the discussion with probing questions
d) periodically summarize what has and what has not been dealt with and/or
resolved
e) draw as many students as possible into the discussion.
Ghosting said:Troll or not, he still asked a valid question. Ok, Im no troll, have the same question, and I dont have multiple user names. Can I get a response?
You haven't joined any rooms.