MDC said:
penguinsfan,
LHR is far superior to electrolysis in that it can treat large areas in a short period of time,

Interesting. My info came from a former coworker that went through a beauty academy a few years ago and used to do some electrolysis.
 
For what it's worth, I saw something on the news a few months ago about some new kind of treatment. Supposedly it was permanent and far less expensive.

It involved using some kind of ultra-violet light or some such shit and the only side effect was it left a burning for a few days that they said compared to something along the lines of a sunburn or tattoo healing.
 
I recently had laser hair removal done on the base of my dick about 6 weeks ago and have since had another session. I would say after 4 weeks after my first session the hair reduction must have been between 85-95%. I would have never thought it would have made this much difference. Lucky I took pictures before and 4 weeks later.

I will show the before and after pictures very soon and provide more details about the cost and the actual laser I had used on me + a report on the different types of lasers.
 
KingJames said:
I recently had laser hair removal done on the base of my dick about 6 weeks ago and have since had another session. I would say after 4 weeks after my first session the hair reduction must have been between 85-95%. I would have never thought it would have made this much difference. Lucky I took pictures before and 4 weeks later.

I will show the before and after pictures very soon and provide more details about the cost and the actual laser I had used on me + a report on the different types of lasers.

..awesome,
 
Back
Top Bottom