Jackson NOT GUILTY

I thought I'd start the thread.
Had a feeling it would come back Not guilty.
I myself think he has abused children but at the end of the day the 12 jurors heard ALL the evidence, I aint..just reconstructions on SkyONE.
Time will tell if he is really a kiddie fiddler.
My final comment on this is this; if it were a normal person on trial, and not a celebrity than do you think that the same verdict would be reached? I dont.

There is too much smoke not to have some fire there somewhere. I agree, if he was anyone but "JACKSON" he would be convicted. I would not want to bet any money on his being innocent. GS

Its like politics with him.

Yeah, and OJ is not a murderer. It makes me sick that these rich and famous scum bags goes free.

I guess if anyone has alot of money they can "fondle" little boys. I personally think the parents of the accusers should have been the ones on trial because you have to be braindead to let your child go over unsupervised to a pedophile's house.

I agree with kal-el. After MJ payed millions in 1993 to shut down that one boy, parents must be crazy to let their kids sleep in a bed with him.

The type parents that let their kids go over there are probably the type that want someting to happen so they can get money out of it. No parent in their right mind would let their kids go over there.

Why you guys didnt really think he would get jail time did you? sili you. He lives in Never Never Land. And no body goes to jail in never never land. He is a sick person too bad he will never see justice. Heck the last time, or was it the time before that? They had a police sketch of his penis and it has some distinctive abnormalities. And he STILL didnt get shit!!

I heard last night that Dvid Letterman said that Saddam Hussein wants to move his trial to Santa Maria, California, haha

Oh well, time will tell if he starts again.
I would love to see the arvizo interview when he was in the police room.
Apparently it was very real and moving, okay so he has had acting lessons but you cant act the victim of abuse, even hollywood finds it hard to get good enough actors.
Janet Arvizo IMHO kinda fucked it up for her son, by clicking her fingers at the jury and being damn off the wall which would be sorta understandable when your kid has been abused, but hey you gotta act calm in a court, but the jury [the few] that used that against her shouldnt have..like the old bat.
Also Jackos lawyer, WORLD CLASS at playing with words....he made the jury always bare and keep in the mind the fact that the arvizos were out for money, and were theives and just damn right nasty pieces of work.
The prosecution could have gone in harder IMHO, and attacked that book they found in jackos house which had naked boys in ,that aint fuckin normal.
I was amazed that the bastard didnt get into the stand, in the UK he WOULD be in the stand or it would and I mean WOULD go against him when the jury come to decision, because if you dont get into the box well now in the UK the judge directs the jury that it should go against them.
Jacko would have been scared to death here because the lawyers ect all wear those wigs that we are so famous for....they are a put off and make you kinda nervous, I've been in a court on duty and its alot more scary than a US court that I've been into...man o man the Ole baily is a fuckin dungeon.
I've been shocked at the US-way of this trial, for starters here in the UK ANYONE under 16 either doesnt go into court, if they do well the wigs AINT WORN and thats the judge included....or they can be filmed in another room on the same premises via a live video link to the court because children are PUT OFF in courts, and I belive that Arvizo boy could have been put off in court, same for Jackos 12 .. TWELVE year old cousin who was in court, I mean thats just sick...a child in a big court in a case like that, make it a live video feed like here in the UK.
Also we have a 10:2, 11:1 and 12 jury decision, UNLIKE in the US which it seems you must all decide.
Jacko would have been torn to fuckin pieces in the box, hence he didnt go in...not right IMHO because the prosecution aint had a fair crack of the wrip.
I hope that someone gets jackon RED HANDED oneday, either pictures being a perv or via the internet...than the world will finally belive the vicims.
Until than he can gather his thoughts, stay away from kids until he feels its time to hunt again...the sick twisted animal.

hey if he wants to fondle little kids, then let him.... jeeez whats wrong with people today. haha im kidding. i personally think he didnt really get sexual, but he was proly messin around and the kids parents overreacted and tried to get money outta him

If he was molesting kids, why would he openly say he sleeps in the beds with them on national tv? Surely this would bring attention to anything dodgy he has been doing.....
But obviously the evidence shows otherwise and the jurers found him not guilty.
I think he is not in a normal state of mind like many others, but I think what he did was in an innocent way.
A dad can sleep in the bed of his young daughter, it does not mean he is commiting incest though does it. In the eyes of Jackson I think he felt like a caring father to them kids, something he never had when he was a child.
I think we live in a world where people live and die for money, and people will do just about anything to get it, even if it means sending someone down for child molestation they will do it, or bombing the shit out of iraq for oil.
Yeah I think the people's intentions were to rinse him of his millions.
The world is a fucked up place anyway that's my 2 cents.
If it was a normal person would they go down?
Who knows, it all depends on eveidence given and whether the jurers like ya or not

Although eccentric, I believe him to only have innocent motives.

I think it's a bit odd that this has happened twice now. I don't find it to be a coincidence at all. I think there is something very wrong with that man and the reality that anyone would allow their children to be anywhere near him alone is asking for trouble, so there is responsibility on all parties. The fact that there were finger prints on the "kiddie" �naked people movies� from him and the boy is proof that something very dodgy was going on. This guy is a freak in every meaning of the term, and he should be put in jail for molesting children. I have to agree with Peter Dick, imagine if OJ had been accussed of murder a second time and was acquitted, it was bad enough the first time but just think about that for a second. There's too much to support the idea that something happened with MJ and this little boy, and it's sad that he was found not guilty.

On another note it is believed that MJ is broke and soon to file for bankruptcy because of his lawyer bills and lack of a career, other than being a side show of course.

To me Michael is a big kid who never got to grow up. We all know that he has issues or he would never have F'd up his face/skin as he did. If you see the things he buys and the way he acts around kids, he is nothing more inside his head but a big kid trap in a mans body. Now having said that, there have been a many a kid at Neverland and out of that only 2 came fourth and stated that he molested them......Hydromaxmmmm? I see it differently. I see a famous person with lots of money that it dosen't take a rocket sceintist to figure out that this may be a quick and easy way of parents trying to get PAID. The jurors saw through it. Enough said!

I still dont think its 'art' which jackson claimed, when a book showing images of clothed and nude pre-adolescent and young teenage boys is found in the house, hidden away.
This was mentioned in court, the book had NUDE BOYS showing their Penis EnlargementNIS...now this is not normal to have in your house, and is very alarming.
That should have made a seperate charge, like it would in the UK than jacko would have had ONE guilty to his name because that book was found and was presented in evidence albeit not as a charge item, but to reinforce or try to show the thick jury that he has potential to abuse kids....fuckin sick.

what got me was that the people saw MJ as a superstar, rather than as a human being. yes i'm sure that some parents were wanting to get paid, and sending their kids over there to potentially get mollested is sick and evil. however, just because the kid is over at his place doesn't mean that he has the right to take nude photos of them, or touch them in any way shape or form and CERTAINLY not share his bed with them all the while. even the news reporters were saying "well i grew up with michael i can't...i cringed at the thought of him committing what he was being accused of. it just couldn't be"....one reporter said that and i wanted to hop through the tv and smack the fuck out of him. everyone seems to forget that the first time this shit was brought up, a kid IDENTIFIED a spot on his Penis EnlargementNIS, not just one spot but many or whatever the fuck happened down there. but the kid described it in detail...which means he has seen it.....and why would he have seen it? Hydromaxmmmm??? his fame got in the way, i wouldn't doubt it if the family helped pay off the jury. janet still has a semi carrer..Hydromaxmmmm makes ya think

I hadn't heard that the kid he settled with was able to identify the characteristics of his penis before these posts. Does anybody know if that is a certain thing? I've been told his description of the abuse was fairly detailed, but that he only thought he might be able to identify some marks on Jackon's genitals or something of that nature.

I don't agree with the opinion that he was found innocent strictly because of the fame factor. The prosecution's case was extremely poor, and the defense was solid. The prosecutors actually claimed that Jackson plied the kid with alcohol and molested him AFTER that special aired and there was so much uproar about the sleeping in the same bed statements. He's obviously not a stable person, but I don't assume he's the stupidest man to ever live either. I don't think a pedophile would necessarily be so enslaved by their compulsions that they were driven to molest a kid with such a huge amount of risk involved, given the enormous amount of public scrutiny that Jackson faced after the documentary.

The prosecutors also failed to produce a single credible witness for any of the charges, and the family themselves where obviously not on the up and up, so most of their testimony was fairly weak, no matter how emotional it may have seemed. One courtroom report I read described how convincingly sullen and sympathetic that kid appeared when he was on the stand and answering the prosecutors questions about the abuse. But when the defense team cross-examined him, he became snide, petulent, and his demeanor changed entirely once they pointed out inconsistencies in his story. In other words, the kid could be extremely convincing when affecting a mood and telling a story that he had practiced, but when they threw some curve balls at him the act fell apart.

The whole thing really is quite sad, innocent or not. Michael Jackson's life has pretty much become a horror show, and I doubt this is the last we'll hear of these types of charges no matter what his behavior is. He's a walking target. I don't know if he's a pedophile or not, but in this case I think he was being exploited by a group of grifters. No mother of an abused child could sit on the stand and talk about it in such a strange, calculated manner as that woman is reported to have done, unless they were mentally unstable or the kid hadn't really been the victim of a predator.

So far as that book, I wouldn't say it's 100% damning. Michael Jackson freely admits he has a lifelong obsession with children and childhood, and the book is an artistic examination of the subject of boyhood and youth, not in any way meant to be sexual. I think it's more interesting that they suggest the guy is a sexual predator and yet the only thing even resembling child �naked people movies�opraphy they can produce is a book of artistic photographs. It might not be a normal thing for a man to have laying around the house, but I don't find it to be any kind of conclusive evidence that he's a child molester. Plenty of people read violent novels or other gory material, and we don't assume they're murderers or pyschopaths just because they own those things.

I've got to agree with Kal-el, Pharoah, and LambdaCalc: the parents are as fucked up as anyone in this story.

Oh well, I figured this would happen, though I have no idea how he escaped an alchohol conviction. Anyway, I'm sure he celebrated his acquittal with a bottle of "Jesus Juice" chilled on ice.

Penis EnlargementTER DICK said:

Yeah, and OJ is not a murderer. It makes me sick that these rich and famous scum bags goes free.

Click to expand...

I get bitchez off like OJ and MJ...

Seriously though, if MJ wants to molest children why doesn't he just go to the third world and buy the kids. It's always easiest to molest the kids that noone will remember. That way he would have his cake and eat it too.

How much do you think MJ paid to get off on his charges, 1 mill per charge?