Question for DLD, or MOS Members. Please respond as soon as possible.

S

ster.john.smith

0
Sorry to rush this but I will no longer have access to the Members site after Friday, for I will only have Internet access at the library.

I have a question regarding the duration of the jelq stroke. In the
phase 1 routine, the strokes are listed as 2 seconds; in the diagram
it says each stroke should take 10 seconds minimum, and then in the
video, it appears DLD is stroking at an approximate rate of one per second. So, I'm confused.

Could someone help me?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I think the main thing is to feel the tissue expanding, really feel the stretch. I do between 3 and 5 second ones, but the main thing is intensity of the squeeze and how hard you are. I'm now jelqing at a lower erection level because I feel it's easier to squeeze a larger wave of blood through the penis. I guess it's a little different for everyone though, just as long as you can feel that stretch,(without injury or pain ofcourse!).
 
I've only done 1-second strokes at quite high erection. This is because if I slow down I feel the blood escaping and I need a high erection because of my low girth (4.6). Otherwise I can't get a firm grip and it doesn't feel like expanding.

But I have to say it does work as I gained nearly an inch in length from jelqing alone but the girth is a problem, which could be the results of my quick strokes.
 
For girth, I think you need to slow down and spend more time on each stroke. Focus more on squeezing as you push that blood forward. Three to five seconds sounds about right to me.
 
Thank you gentlemen, very much. I truly appreciate the swift responses.

Have any of you actually consulted DLD on the matter. I would like to hear from him, as well, as he is the author of the members site. I would just like to know the reason for the apparent disparity between the advocation of the two second jelq stroke on the routine instructions, the roughly one-second stroke on the video footage, and the advocation of a minimum 10 second stroke on the medical diagrams.

DLD's the authority around these parts, so I imagine he could provide the most definitive answer.

DLD, do you see this post? I hope so. I don't have much time left around here.
 
ster.john.smith said:
Thank you gentlemen, very much. I truly appreciate the swift responses.

Have any of you actually consulted DLD on the matter. I would like to hear from him, as well, as he is the author of the members site. I would just like to know the reason for the apparent disparity between the advocation of the two second jelq stroke on the routine instructions, the roughly one-second stroke on the video footage, and the advocation of a minimum 10 second stroke on the medical diagrams.

DLD's the authority around these parts, so I imagine he could provide the most definitive answer.

DLD, do you see this post? I hope so. I don't have much time left around here.
Click to expand...


On the site they are typo's, we correct them as they pop-up but it is an ongoing process because of new constant and 100's of history pages. Thank you for letting me know.

The jelq, as per my video, should be fairly quick (1-2 sec) with a very tight grasp. Each stroke should follow the next with out interruption trying to keep as much blood in the penis as possible. Hope that helps.
 
It helps, indeed. Thank you, DLD.

What role does stroke duration play in growth? I have read that slower, more concentrated strokes encourage girth growth. Surely, a balance must be struck. It is possible, I imagine, to go too slowly or too quickly.

Also, can you explain how one is to ensure uniform growth through uniform exercise in reference to the jelq? As you likely know, I wish to avoid the baseball shape. I have read that to negate that effect, one need jelq at higher erection levels, so as to provide the necessary even displacement of pressures--not solely in the upper shaft regions, but throughout the shaft. Is my understanding correct?

If a response to this is not posted by tomorrow, I will in all likelihood be unable to offer thanks for it, as I will no longer have access to the forum. So, please take no offense is such is the case.

DLD, I'll be in contact through other means. Thanks again, Mate.
 
ster.john.smith said:
It helps, indeed. Thank you, DLD.

What role does stroke duration play in growth? I have read that slower, more concentrated strokes encourage girth growth. Surely, a balance must be struck. It is possible, I imagine, to go too slowly or too quickly.
Click to expand...

The stroke speed I used in the video is what worked for me. It gave me very quick gains and my site is all about the way I did things.

ster.john.smith said:
Also, can you explain how one is to ensure uniform growth through uniform exercise in reference to the jelq? As you likely know, I wish to avoid the baseball shape. I have read that to negate that effect, one need jelq at higher erection levels, so as to provide the necessary even displacement of pressures--not solely in the upper shaft regions, but throughout the shaft. Is my understanding correct?
Click to expand...

I have always jelqed (or most other girth work) at 100% erect. My growth and shape is very uniform. I really believe that the baseball bat effect comes from a difference in strength, pressure and stroke between the two hands. I was always very careful to keep a balanced stroke between the two.

ster.john.smith said:
If a response to this is not posted by tomorrow, I will in all likelihood be unable to offer thanks for it, as I will no longer have access to the forum. So, please take no offense is such is the case.

DLD, I'll be in contact through other means. Thanks again, Mate.
Click to expand...

I will email this response to you also.
 
Thank you so much, DLD.

The 100 percent jelqing level makes perfect sense to me to ensure uniformity, but do you think there to be any danger in it, as some have at Thunder's.

I also notice that the head doesn't seem to engorge at 100 percent erection, though at slightly lower erection, it fills up quite nicely. Have any idea why this is?

I can see how disparity in grip strength and stroke consistency from one hand to the other could produce uneven/asymmetrical gains between the two sides of the shaft (as I have seen in some photos), but I don't understand how it could be the determining factor in uniform development of the shaft lengthwise (hence, baseball bat effect). Could you explain?

I'll email this as well. I've only written this post in the event that you're able to respond to it today.

I am truly excited. I think all of this just might work!
 
ster.john.smith said:
Thank you so much, DLD.

The 100 percent jelqing level makes perfect sense to me to ensure uniformity, but do you think there to be any danger in it, as some have at Thunder's.

I also notice that the head doesn't seem to engorge at 100 percent erection, though at slightly lower erection, it fills up quite nicely. Have any idea why this is?

I can see how disparity in grip strength and stroke consistency from one hand to the other could produce uneven/asymmetrical gains between the two sides of the shaft (as I have seen in some photos), but I don't understand how it could be the determining factor in uniform development of the shaft lengthwise (hence, baseball bat effect). Could you explain?

I'll email this as well. I've only written this post in the event that you're able to respond to it today.

I am truly excited. I think all of this just might work!
Click to expand...

lengthwise the shape could be effected by a grip that is too tight at the base that loosens at it gets to the top just the opposite.

Not quite sure why the glans would be more full at a lower erection level. My glans is filled at maximum when my penis is most hard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top