Low LOT=No Gains?

D

dex

0
Hi guys,
i have a question.
There is a theory around, that men with a small penis have a better chance to gain, because in most cases there LOT is higher.
This theory works for a lot of guys.
All men talking about gains, for example 2-3 inches, referred it to a high LOT.

When i was starting with pe, it was said that pe works for 95 % of all men.
Can we say the 5 percent of men whose not able to gain have low LOTs?

Does this mean:Having a low LOT makes it very hard or even impossible to gain?
 
How do you know if you have a low or high LOT? Ive heard about this whole LOT thing before but never really paid any attention, someone wanna tell me what its all about id apreciate it
 
The LOT discussion is not active at mattersofsize. It has never been but it is nice someone brings it up. Everyone has potential to gain either from tunica stretching or lig stretching but the LOT is very important when it comes to fast gains... To make a long story short. A high LOT shows potential to gain from low angle stretches which attacks the ligs. For us people who already have a low LOT for one reason or another need to concentrate on high angle stretches or budled stretches to attack the tunica....
 
The LOT theory has helped allot of guys break out of plateaus and fo rthat reason alone it is a good thing. For myself, my LOT has always been extremely low but I still make gains doing LIG work so I don't know what to think. Since Bib came up with the LOT theory I have focused a bit more on upward stretches but I still love the LIG stretching.
 
My own theory is that erection angle is not affected by the lig stretches. The angle is the same, but with a low LOT it is easier to take the penis and pull it down from a 11 o clock erection angle to a 9 o clock erection angle... Causing less g-spot stimulation...
 
I think Penis Enlargement works for all men it just might take more time for some than others. When you have a low LOT it does not necessarily mean that you cannot gain (from my understanding) but that it will take more time than someone with a high LOT.

Also over time through doing exercises that stretch the tunica your LOT increases, so you can work the ligs again and get some quick gains, diminish those switch back to tunica exercises, rinse, repeat. So don't get discouraged if you have a low LOT, just means it will take more time but you can still reach any goals you set. Good luck!
 
Cybershot said:
I think Penis Enlargement works for all men it just might take more time for some than others. When you have a low LOT it does not necessarily mean that you cannot gain (from my understanding) but that it will take more time than someone with a high LOT.

Also over time through doing exercises that stretch the tunica your LOT increases, so you can work the ligs again and get some quick gains, diminish those switch back to tunica exercises, rinse, repeat. So don't get discouraged if you have a low LOT, just means it will take more time but you can still reach any goals you set. Good luck!
Click to expand...

I have not followed the latest information on the LOT Theory but I am curious to know what happened with SS4 finding were on if LOT changes over time. I know that when I get myself into a BUNDLED stretch position my LOT temp. changes and becomes much higher. If HIGH LOT=LIG stretching then wouldn't a HIGH-LOT from bundled stretches produce the same results?
 
Hmm, probably. Don't think it matters what the source of the LOT shift was as long as it was oriented to a higher position to hit the ligs more. I haven't been keeping up on all the updates myself and people's experimentation mainly because I haven't applied the LOT theory to my own regime.

But it still is an interesting thought and I might see it useful if my gains start tapering off or if I get seriously into hanging with all the angles and such.
 
I dont belive in the LOT theory.
If you pull on your penis intense and in a reguler fashion, any direction you will gain ... regardless of LOT theorys, I did.
 
There are so little sience behind Penis Enlargement. 99% of the knowledge is based on trial and error. As long as we gain there is no problem with that. But there are many question marks. In my opinion reasersch will pay off. Bibs LOT theory has helped me and thousands of others to understand why we don't see any fast gains anylonger. Everybody gain at different speeds. Why is that? Except genes and our current view on penis enlargement. There are more to learn and probably other aspects which we are not familiar with yet... Don't you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top