Hello, first time poster, and after looking at the statistics post on here talking about the percentiles, I realized that while I am only running around the 50% for length, I am actually at the 100% for girth.
So a thought came to mind after thinking about that(other than I dont want my dick to look like a coke can with massive girth but no length).
I am uncircumsized, so when I masturbate I more or less and jelqing(as I dont use lube and basically move the skin back and forth with pressure).
So basically, by just being a horny teenage boy, I have more or less been Penis Enlargementing for about a decade now.
May just put another argument on the table for not circing your boys.
What are your thoughts on the possibility here? I know it is entirely possible to be very girthy with minimal length, but if those statistics are remotely close, it would seem that some other factor could be playing a role in the disparity between the two.
So a thought came to mind after thinking about that(other than I dont want my dick to look like a coke can with massive girth but no length).
I am uncircumsized, so when I masturbate I more or less and jelqing(as I dont use lube and basically move the skin back and forth with pressure).
So basically, by just being a horny teenage boy, I have more or less been Penis Enlargementing for about a decade now.
May just put another argument on the table for not circing your boys.
What are your thoughts on the possibility here? I know it is entirely possible to be very girthy with minimal length, but if those statistics are remotely close, it would seem that some other factor could be playing a role in the disparity between the two.