Baseline photos

[carl]

I took a couple of pictures from the top - if necessary I'll go from the side too, but what is your estimate?

Just started phase one on Saturday. Just like to say I wish this was around when I was in school in the '80s.

 

[Mr.Winkle]

Looks huge. 8" by 6" maybe?

 

[carl]

No, it's actually substantially smaller on girth - must be the angle of the shot.

 

[Provider]

6.5NBP x 5 ?

 

[philadelph]

~ 8 x 5.6 girth. I think you may have one of those wide flat dicks that appear much larger from the top. Great size.

 

[ctmwm]

WOW you are already at some guy's goals!! Your gonna have a weapon there!!

 

[carl]

Thanks for the positive feedback! I guess it looks a bit bigger in the pic than it really is. I'm long but need some (lots!) girth work. I'm actually 8x5.

I also want to increase the flaccid size - not just length but girth, which doesn't get mentioned much (FG?).

I'll post some updates in a few months when I've (hopefully) made some gains.

 

[Priapologist]

Are you sure you measured correctly? Based on the length to width ratio in picture #2 (least foreshortened) and the figures that you've given, your length to girth measures are either 8 x 6.4 or 6.2 x 5. Either that or you have a really flat cock or a really thick fat pad (doesn't look like it, though).

I am working from non-bone pressed measurements, obviously.

 

[carl]

I actually have virtually no fat pad. My NBPenis EnlargementL measure is 7.75" and my girth is most definitely 5".

It's probably a result of the second dimension of girth not being visible in the pictures, right?

 

[philadelph]

Yes, I have seen another guy with a shape similar to yours, named Dangleman or something at thunders. You have a great place to start, and can add good "depth" to your penis by focusing on "Horse" squeezes. I started with more of a flatter shaped penis and it seems most of my gains have been in depth.

 

[Priapologist]

I actually have virtually no fat pad. My NBPenis EnlargementL measure is 7.75" and my girth is most definitely 5".

It's probably a result of the second dimension of girth not being visible in the pictures, right?

Yes. If your cock is more oval in crossection, then your apparent width won't agree with your measured girth. This is why photos from the side are useful. My cock is nearly cylindrical, so my topside apparent width almost perfectly agrees with my measured girth (about 0.05" difference). That's what threw me with your pics, we have roughly the same length, but you look just a little girthier than I am, despite the fact that I have 5.9" girth.

So, I assume then that you have a more oval shaped shaft. Correct?

Cheers!

 

[carl]

I'm most definitely more of an oval shape. When I get the camera back from the gf, I"ll take some more pictures.

Incidentally, I happened to mention my new P.E. pastime to my gf and she was ever the skeptic and cynic! While believing it may be possible to lengthen it a "little" she said there's "no way" that I'll be able to make it girthier.

I also asked her how many inches of girth she thought I had. She replied "2 inches."

eek.