Benjamin Siegel

0
Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
384
how you doin guys, i found this very interestin atricle, that ive pasted below, ive also included the link to the artricle. i decided to post and share this with the other members of MOS, because some of us have anger or mistrust of most women due to our expierences with a few bad apples (or cherries in this case hahaha). ive read some posts on here about how some members at MOS dont believe in love or relationships, and prefer to just bang women and just move on. from some of the posts that i have read on MOS some members show some symptoms of what the article is talkin about.


i personally admit, that i dont trust most females due to my past experience with some of them, and have anger towards of the ones that are similar to the bad cherries because of this......and im sure many other members share this feelin with me. also we as males bond on the MOS forums about our expierences, no matter if they are good ones or bad....accordin to this article some male bondin is another symptom. i just dont agree that the article considers "macho" bondin as repressed homosexuality....we at MOS talk and help each other out with penis related issues..(i think thats as macho in male bondin as it can get)...the article makes some interestin points but i dont agree with everythin that its say.


so i was wonderin, after youve read the article.....are most of us at MOS Narcissists?


please read the whole article, and share your thoughts and comments on this subject and the article itself, thank you.

so heres the article:


Do Narcissists Really Hate Women?

Narcissism, Pathological Narcissism, The Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), the Narcissist,

and Relationships with Abusive Narcissists and Psychopaths

By: Dr. Sam Vaknin


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question:

I read somewhere in your web site that narcissists hate women. Nothing can be further from the truth, from my experience. All the narcissists in my life ADORED women, they were addicted to women, they worshipped women. My ex-husband couldn't live without women - many women.

Answer:

Narcissists abhor and dread getting emotionally intimate. The cerebral ones regard sex as a maintenance chore, something they have to do in order to keep their Source of Secondary Narcissistic Supply (spouse or girlfriend). The somatic narcissist treats women as objects and sex as a means of obtaining narcissistic supply.

Moreover, many narcissists tend to FRUSTRATE women. They refrain from having sex with them, tease them and then leave them, resist the flirtatious and seductive behaviors of females and so on. Often, they invoke the existence of a girlfriend/fiancée/spouse (or boyfriend/etc. – male and female are interchangeable in my texts) as the "reason" why they cannot have sex or develop a relationship. But this is not out of loyalty and fidelity in the empathic and loving sense. This is because they wish (and often succeed) to sadistically frustrate the interested party.

But this pertains only to cerebral narcissists - not to somatic narcissists and people who suffer from HPD (Histrionic Personality Disorder). These use their bodies, sexuality, and seduction/flirtation to extract narcissistic supply from others.

Some narcissists are raised by weak or inaccessible mothers and harsh, rigid, or sadistic fathers. They tend to bond with males in male settings (army, sports, police, bodybuilding, the Catholic Church) and to seek empathy, warmth, support, secure friendship, and love among their male peers. This macho bonding masks repressed and latent homosexual tendencies, the result of incestuous or simply pathologically excessive love towards the father (or father figure).

Terrified of these homosexual tendencies, these narcissists are besieged by feelings of guilt (towards their mothers with whom they compete for the father's affection) and inadequacy (they can never quite measure up to the father's standards). They become extreme and virulent misogynists. By hating women and defying them - they hate and defy life itself (women being the givers of life). They thus deny their effeminate self and exercise their self-destructive impulses.

Narcissists are misogynists. They team up with women as mere sources of SNS (secondary narcissistic supply). The woman's chores are to accumulate past Narcissistic Supply and release it in an orderly manner, so as to regulate the fluctuating flow of primary supply. In other words, the woman's chore is to bear witness to the narcissist's moments of glory and recount them to him when he is down.

Otherwise, cerebral narcissists are not interested in women. Most of them are asexual (engage in sexual acts very rarely, if at all). They hold women in contempt and abhor the thought of being really intimate with them. Usually, they choose suBathmateissive women, well below their level, to perform the aforementioned functions.

This leads to a vicious cycle of neediness, self-contempt (“how come I am dependent on this inferior woman”) and aggression directed at the woman. Hence the abuse. When primary Narcissistic Supply is available – when the narcissist is the center of attention - the woman in his life is hardly tolerated. The narcissist interacts with her minimally, as one reluctantly pays the premium on an insurance policy.

The narcissist does regard the "subjugation" of an attractive woman to be a source of narcissistic supply.

It is a status symbol, a proof of virility, and it allows him to engage in "vicarious" narcissistic behaviors (allows him to be his narcissistic self through others, to transform others into tools at the service of his narcissism, into his extensions). This is done by employing defence mechanisms such as projective identification.

To re-iterate, Primary Narcissistic Supply (NS) is any kind of NS provided by people who are not "meaningful" or "significant" others. Adulation, attention, affirmation, fame, notoriety, sexual conquests – are all forms of Primary NS.

Secondary NS emanates from people who are in constant and repetitive touch with the narcissist. It includes the important roles of narcissistic accumulation and narcissistic regulation, among others.

The narcissist believes that being in love IS actually going through the motions and pretending. To him, emotions are mimicry and pretence.

He says: "I am a conscious misogynist. I fear and loathe women and tend to ignore them to the best of my ability. To me they are a mixture of hunter and parasite."

Most male Narcissists are misogynists. After all, they are the warped creations of women. Women gave birth to them and molded them into what they are: dysfunctional, maladaptive, emotionally dead. They are angry at their mothers and, by extension, mad at all women.

The narcissist's attitude to women is, naturally, complex and multi-layered but it revolves around four axes:

The Holy Whore
The Hunter Parasite
The Frustrating Object of Desire
Uniqueness Roles


The narcissist divides all women to saints and whores. He finds it difficult to have sex ("dirty", "forbidden", "punishable", "degrading") with feminine significant others (spouse, intimate girlfriend). To him, sex and intimacy are mutually exclusive rather than mutually expressive propositions. Sex is reserved to "whores" (all other women in the world).

This distinction resolves his constant cognitive dissonance ("I want her but...", "I don't need her but..."). It also legitimizes his sadistic urges (abstaining from sex is a major and recurrent narcissistic "penalty" inflicted on female "transgressors"). It tallies well with the frequent idealization-devaluation cycles the narcissist subjects his women to. The idealized females are sexless, the devalued ones – "deserving" of their degradation (sex) and the contempt that, inevitably, follows thereafter.

The narcissist believes firmly that women are out to "hunt" men and that this is almost a genetic predisposition. As a result, he feels threatened (as any prey would). This, of course, is an intellectualization of the real, absolutely opposite, state of things: the narcissist feels threatened by women and tries to justify this irrational fear by imbuing women with "objective" qualities which make them, to his mind, ominous.

This is a small detail in a larger canvass of "pathologizing" others in order to control them. According to the narcissist’s scenario, once her prey is secured, the woman assumes the role of a "body snatcher". She absconds with the narcissist's sperm, she generates an endless stream of demanding and nose dripping children, she financially bleeds the men in her life to cater to her needs and to the needs of her dependants. Put differently, she is a parasite, a leech, whose sole function is to suck dry every man she finds and Tarantula-like decapitate them once no longer useful. This, of course, is exactly what the narcissist does to people. Thus, his view of women is a projection.

Heterosexual narcissists desire women as any other red-blooded male does (even more so due to the special symbolic nature of the woman in the narcissist's life – humbling a woman in acts of faintly sadomasochistic sex is a way of getting back at mother). But he is frustrated by his inability to meaningfully interact with them, by their apparent emotional depth and powers of psychological penetration (real or attributed) and by their sexuality.

Their incessant demands for intimacy are perceived by the narcissist as a threat. He recoils instead of getting closer. The cerebral narcissist also despises sex and is bored by it, as we said before. Thus, caught in a seemingly intractable repetition complex, in approach-avoidance cycles, the narcissist becomes furious at the source of his frustration. Some of them set out to do some frustrating of their own. They tease (passively or actively), or they pretend to be asexual and, in any case, they turn down, rather cruelly, any attempt by a woman to court them and to get closer.

Sadistically, narcissists tremendously enjoy their ability to frustrate the desires, passions and sexual wishes of women. It endows them with a feeling of omnipotence. Narcissists regularly frustrate all women sexually – and frustrate the significant women in their lives both sexually and emotionally. Somatic narcissists simply use women as objects and then discard them. The emotional background is identical. While the cerebral narcissist punishes through abstention – the somatic narcissist penalizes through excess.

The narcissist's mother kept behaving as though the narcissist was and is not special (to her). The narcissist's whole life is a pathetic and pitiful effort to prove her wrong. The narcissist constantly seeks confirmation from others that he IS special – in other words that he IS.

Having sex with women threatens the success of this quest because it is "bestial" and "common". There is nothing "special or unique" about sex. Women keep dragging the narcissist to their level, the level of the lowest common denominator of intimacy, sex and human emotions.

Anybody can love, copulate and breed, says the narcissist to himself. These emotions and activities d not set me apart and above others. And yet women seem to be interested ONLY in these pursuits. Thus, the narcissist is led to believe that women are the continuation, by other means and in different guises, of his mother - this early robber of his uniqueness.

The narcissist hates women virulently, passionately and uncompromisingly. His hate is primal, irrational, the progeny of mortal fear and sustained abuse. Granted, most narcissists learn how to suppress, disguise, even repress these untoward feelings. But their hatred does get out of control and erupt from time to time. It is a terrifying, paralyzing sight - the true face of the narcissist.

To live with a narcissist is an arduous and eroding task. Narcissists are atrabilious, infinitely pessimistic, bad-tempered, paranoid and sadistic in an absent-minded and indifferent manner. Their daily routine is a rigmarole of threats, complaints, hurts, eruptions, moodiness and rage. The narcissist rails against slights true and imagined. He alienates people. He humiliates them because this is his only weapon against the humiliation wrought by their indifference.

Gradually, wherever he is, the narcissist’s social circle dwindles and then vanishes. Every narcissist is also a schizoid, to some extent. A schizoid is not a misanthrope. He does not necessarily hate people - he simply does not need them. He regards social interactions as a nuisance to be minimized.

The narcissist is torn between his need to obtain narcissistic supply (from human beings) - and his fervent wish to be left alone. This wish is peppered with contempt and feelings of superiority.

There are fundamental conflicts between counter-dependence and contempt, neediness and devaluation, seeking and avoiding, turning on the charm to attract adulation and being consumed by wrathful reactions to even the most minuscule "provocations". These conflicts lead to rapid cycling between gregariousness and self-imposed ascetic seclusion.

Such an unpredictable but always bilious and festering atmosphere is hardly conducive to love or sex. Gradually, both become extinct. Relationships are hollowed out. Imperceptibly, the narcissist switches to a non-sexual co-habitation.

But the vitriolic environment that the narcissist creates is only one hand of the equation. The other hand is his unfortunate female partner.

As we said, heterosexual narcissists are attracted to women, but simultaneously repelled, horrified, bewitched and provoked by them. They seek to frustrate and humiliate them. Psychodynamically, the Narcissist probably visits upon them his mother's sins - but such an instant explanation does the subject great injustice.

Most narcissists are misogynists. Their sexual and emotional lives are perturbed and chaotic. They are unable to love in any true sense of the word - nor are they capable of developing any measure of intimacy. Lacking empathy, they are unable to offer to the partner emotional sustenance.

Do narcissists miss loving, would they have liked to love and are they angry with their parents for crippling them so?

To the narcissist, these questions are incomprehensible. There is no way he can answer them. Narcissists never love. They do not know what is it that they are supposedly missing. Observing it from the outside, love seems to them to be a risible pathology. They equate love with weakness. They hate being weak and they hate and despise weak people (such as the very old, the sick, the poor, and the very young). They do not tolerate what they consider to be stupidity, disease and dependence - and love seems to be comprised of all three. These are not sour grapes. They really feel this way.

Narcissists are angry men - but not because they never experienced love and probably never will. They are angry because they are not as powerful, awe inspiring and successful as they wish they were and, to their mind, deserve to be. Because their daydreams refuse so stubbornly to come true. Because they are their worst enemy. And because, in their unmitigated paranoia, they see adversaries plotting everywhere and feel discriminated against and contemptuously ignored.

Many of them (the “borderline” narcissists) cannot conceive of a life in one place with one set of people, doing the same thing, in the same field with one goal within a decades-old game plan. To them, this is the equivalent of dying. They are most terrified of boredom and whenever faced with its daunting prospect, they inject drama, or even danger, into their lives. This is the only way they feel alive.

The narcissist is a lonely wolf. He is a shaky platform, indeed, on which to found a family.


http://samvak.tripod.com/narcissistshatewomen.html
 
:popped up: looks like a fly ball...

to everyone that has read this article, what are your thoughts on it? do you agree with it? or do you think the person that wrote it, is full of shit?
 
Heh, narcissism: like gatorade.

I don't consider myself to be A narcissist, though there are tons of things in the world that can create narcissistic behaviors. And there are tons of different people, and as such there are tons of different narcissists.

There are those narcissists who gets many chances to humiliate the people they come across. Then there are those narcissists who say they are who they are, and simply never get a chance to express themselves because everybody just moves on when they see his withdrawal. If all narcissist men got attention from women, they would all indulge in misogynistic behavior. If no narcissist men got attention from women, they would all be labeled as frustrated bachelors. Cuz it's easy to label people when they don't get to indulge in their behaviors regardless. Like a thief who has no opportunities to rob. The sad part is that a person's narcissistic behavior, what prevents him from indulging in the very thing he's lusted for since birth, can decide the entire rest of his life for him because of one small thing that's happened. It's easiest to mention this on a site dedicated to penis enlargement because penis size and its correlation to the media linking to competitive men and men who just cry inside (maybe both) has almost evolved into an archetype.

Today people look for ways to solve problems. I can't imagine it was a whole lot better back in those days. You just didn't have the whole world breathing down your neck; perhaps the people around you. But think about it...you couldn't have some preppy 16-year old who needed a cock jammed down her throat talking down to men who were insecure about their size from a webcam video on youtube because there was no such thing. Crazy people like that kept to themselves.

It's hard for me to define myself as one particular thing, except for perhaps "artist". There are so many reasons I wish I could be alone forever, but then I realize it's all based on a hatred that came from a few people at certain key points in my life; like a good few karate chops to a pressure point. Instead I NEED to be with people, and I also tend to be dismissive of things even though I was always selective. But it turns itself into a contradiction very fast. I long for companionship, but what kind? After romance is dead, what else is there really? There's tons of stuff, but is any of it for me? Or would I embrace it if I didn't feel I had to do the things I do because of the way I was born? Would I fantasize more and talk to women more if I wasn't insecure? Or on a completely unrelated note, what kinds of stereotypes would I be embracing if I were born, say, black? The world's not going to care what I think of it because the world can go on if I die; a sad fact that proves there's no real pre-determined purpose for any one being in the world. Either way, I think in the journey of life one of the main goals is to solve this contradiction of where a person belongs in the world.

On one hand, you've got narcissists that are way outgoing and rather humiliating. A lot of these kinds of people enjoy hurting other people, probably because of their own self-hatred even though pure evil does indeed exist. Like I wonder how many bad people out there were just good people turned bad. And I sometimes wonder if I was turned bad from good and am now friends with villains. They all describe similar experiences of letdown, betrayal, and how they plan on rising up from the ashes to show the world it shouldn't have been so haphazard in its dismissal of goings-on.
Do you think Bill Gates created Microsoft because he wanted to help the world? Fuck no. A lot of people might hate him because their computers don't ever seem to work, but frankly if Bill Gates had created Microsoft to help the world rather than for profit, don't you think all of this frustration would be minimal? Just an example to realize that a lot of us can be narcissist-like more often than not, for very simple reasons. It's our own way of getting back at our birth circumstances. Whether it be shit parents, siblings, bullying in school, or perhaps getting teased sadistically by the very girls we were born to chase after. It's like, what can you do after that? It's like poisonous cake. You have to avoid it. But you don't want to and you feel it.

So many young people today think that withdrawing themselves from society will create a statement. Though people are too busy to know such a thing and in their unwillingness to embrace a new movement they define it with a label, which is another popular thing to do in today's lazy societies. A place like Evergreen teaches a person to make statements by being active, even if they feel withdrawn from the world. And I must say it's been an enlightening process of ongoing self-discovery. Though in a place like high school where you and everything you stand for is defined by predetermined labels, you can see the origin of a shitton of behavior. It tends to stretch out into adulthood; the intellectuals seeing their path laying ahead of them and yet following it anyway either out of a sense of desire or perhaps a feeling of no control. That's the difference between those who heal and those who lay down and get hurt. I don't think masochists would exist if every single one of those people knew they could enjoy happiness very easily, and I don't think dominant people would seek to dominate if they didn't have a fear of being controlled and seek to control first, even if the adrenaline gets to them as they hurt other people, wishing inside they could simply love like all others in a simple world with simple circumstances.

That was a mouthful. Heh.
 
I guess there is no hope for me:)
 
Back
Top Bottom