Texture difference between lig and tunica gains?

G

going4nine

0
I was just wondering if anyone has noticed a difference in their dick's texture when they've gained length via lig stretch compared to gains made through tunica stretching.

On my own unit, the base seems to be thicker and less inner-penis is imprinted. Farther up, where I presume I have tunica gains, the shaft is more vascular.
 
Yeah, what you say makes sense. Just observing my own dick pics, I think you can see that the upper shaft is more vascular, while the one inch thicker (in girth) base of the shaft is "meatier," and less vascular. The shaft near the base feels much stronger, (which must come from isolating the ligs), and surely takes more stress in my routine than further up the shaft.

I guess it also depends on the dimensions of your penis. Mine is pretty oval shaped. But I think the base girth is deeper than it is wide. With a full blown woody, I've measured my shaft near the base at 2"+, but the depth (from top to bottom) is closer to 3".
 
The vascularity is what I'm especially concerned about since I'm going for the veiny "angry penis" look. I've made some lig gains by hanging recently and have noticed that the skin around it is much smoother. Do you think that girth exercises would alter things further? Also, would tunica gains not cause hair to grow down the shaft?

Lastly, are tunica gains take longer or are more difficult to achieve than lig gains?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top