So I think I did this right. I stretched my penis straight out (9 o clock) while flacid and watched my penis in the mirror while doing a kegal and noticed pullback. It was at a 45 degree angle downwards or 7:30 that I noticed no pullback. So did I do the test correctly and posses a LOT of 7:30? I would assume that is a average LOT for guys?
My LOT test
Stakada;741349 said:
Stakada, No discouragement meant, only clarification. LOT is a LOT of BS. My LOT was straight down 6:00. This was about 6 months into my training when this 'theory' came out. According to the study I could not gain with downward stretches, guess what I gained plenty with downward stretches. LOT is confusing and teaches men things that simply are not true. If you reform all the basic stretches there is no way you can't gain.
Srry but What is LOT?
I remember reading about that years ago and thinking “Who the hell crocked this shit up?”
ThatDude512;742309 said:
It was very discouraging to many men who would have made gains but did not because they followed LOT theory. Men who could have made incredible downward stretching gains were told they could no longer gain from that point because of their LOT, or position of the cock when flex becomes nil. This was not true and I proved it as my LOT was one where I should have not been able to make gains doing downward work, I did it anyway and gained 2". A theory is a theory until it becomes a law or simply useless.
REDZULU2003
Well-known member
Perhaps go into more detail DLD on why this theory is crap. Not calling you out, but allot of guys believe in it and have had progress utilizing it. I myself have always stood by the mantra ''If I continue to stretch that bit further and harder each session, I will grow .. I have to'' same with girth ''Aim to expand it more and more past the maximum erection capacity'' Obviously do all these things within safety limits and not go like a bat out of hell.
My gut feeling was the LOT theory was just a rough guide. You know more about it then I do. Perhaps create a detailed thread and break it down as to why its crap.
My gut feeling was the LOT theory was just a rough guide. You know more about it then I do. Perhaps create a detailed thread and break it down as to why its crap.
LOT or Loss of Tug back is in error as it dictates if your loss of tug back is at 3:00 or lower you can not make gains with downward stretching. This is simply untrue as I made most of my gains with downward stretches and my loss of tug back was at 6:00! So, according to LOT, I should have not been able to gain anymore length with downward stretching. Low and behold I gained most of my length through downward stretching. It also fall short in the fact that there is no limit to ligament stretching when you consider Behind the Cheeks stretching, with BTC there is no limit but how long you live. LOT made PE very confusing and it sent many men off with no gains as they put all their hope in LOT. Instead of LOT stick with KIS, Keeping it simple, if you stretch it, it will grow no matter where your penis loses tug back.
REDZULU2003
Well-known member
It makes me confused, but I'm sure the guy who thought it up had the right intentions.
REDZULU2003;742835 said:
I can see where someone new to PE would want to apply the principle but the methods here on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] seem much more simple IMHO
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
didn't Lot have sex with his daughters?
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
recovering from my Catholic Schooling
Big Schwanz Acht;743050 said:
You need serious help!
This is why I am a Born Again Christian! I will never completely recover from what I went through but I neither hold the church responsible, I let it go as it was taking up space in my mind. I did take many beautiful things from Catholicism but for the most part it messed me up. This is one of my favorite Pastors who speaks on the Bible with nothing added. He is very cool and down to earth. He will help anyone who is bound by religion to let it go and believe in one thing, the word of God.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AlJhuH0iYoI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Lot theory is useless