Ultrasound Penis Enlargement
- Thread starter Jackxxx
- Start date
One of the things that catch my attention in this topic is the amount of useless posts on each thread. There has been very specific protocols proven to work and provide results, yet people keep asking stupid questions, questioning what is already proven, trying different methods, then asking why it doesn't work, etc. Kyrpa many times answered sarcastically exposing the iq of certain individuals.
Bottom line there is NO REASON to question ANYTHING that has already been proven. There are multiple members with outstanding results, their protocols exposed, equipment, it is a matter or replicating and tweaking.
Bottom line there is NO REASON to question ANYTHING that has already been proven. There are multiple members with outstanding results, their protocols exposed, equipment, it is a matter or replicating and tweaking.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 124,618
All this research you’re doing I’m gonna end up stealing LOL but seriously this research will really help us in the future and the production of our products. I will have to make czar of Ultrasound!
Its not stealing my friend!! Thats the whole purpose of this thread
The idea is to bypass all these years of research, trial and error, experimentation, hundreds and hundreds of pages of threads, and compile everything precise and concise here.
What is proven to work I am trying to put together here, so it can e useful for this board and its members. Thats why instead of copying and pasting information, I prefer to just throw in here equipment, tools, protocols, whatever has been PROVEN to work.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- Messages
- 1,710
Bro I'm literally one of the guys that proved ultrasound works and started the discussion on this board. It's literally one of the things I attribute my nearly 0.5 BPEL gain since last June and this is coming as a 17 year veteran, the other things are the principles I listed in my thread that I linked on page 1 of this thread. I even got kyrpa to join here and comment in the thread I linked in this thread. I'm not trying to disprove anything only offer a correction about 1 mHz. Maybe your interpretation of the data is different than mine or maybe you're misunderstanding me. There's 2 units of measurement with ultrasound. One is frequency, here we are talking about 1 mHz vs 3 mHz. The other unit is intensity, watts/cm².
Manko did experiments with both 1 mHz and 3 mHz to compare them as well as IR lamp and rice sock. He bought a very expensive machine that does both. Based on his intrauretal measurements 1 mHz and 3 mHz are pretty comparable, with 3 mHz heating slightly faster. Again I'll repeat the 3 mHz did heat faster. The 1 mHz was still able to get into therapeutic range with slightly more time. I have the data of his experiment and kyrpa's quoted in the thread I made on this board, MOS, I think on the 3rd or 4th page. The thread I linked here on the first page of your thread titled "Learning with Longstretch" discusses in detail about ultrasound therapy and I posted studies that discuss as well as tutorials on how the machine operates from YouTube physical therapists. I spent a lot of time on that thread and I may be biased but I think it's worth a read.
Manko did experiments with both 1 mHz and 3 mHz to compare them as well as IR lamp and rice sock. He bought a very expensive machine that does both. Based on his intrauretal measurements 1 mHz and 3 mHz are pretty comparable, with 3 mHz heating slightly faster. Again I'll repeat the 3 mHz did heat faster. The 1 mHz was still able to get into therapeutic range with slightly more time. I have the data of his experiment and kyrpa's quoted in the thread I made on this board, MOS, I think on the 3rd or 4th page. The thread I linked here on the first page of your thread titled "Learning with Longstretch" discusses in detail about ultrasound therapy and I posted studies that discuss as well as tutorials on how the machine operates from YouTube physical therapists. I spent a lot of time on that thread and I may be biased but I think it's worth a read.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- Messages
- 1,710
Here's the post comparing the 2. Hopefully this will shed some light that I posted on this thread to further your cause. Wish you the best brother.
mattersofsize.com
The Long Game: Learning with Longstretch, Key Principles to Make Sustained Growth - Matters of Size | Male Enhancement, Body Modifications & Peyronies Forums
People did test Janus' theories but his hypotheses on why his exercises worked were flawed and he quickly plunged into quackery. Though I will say for me at least I have noticed improvements with what little AM I have done so far. I would love to see an experiment set up. I participated in one...
mattersofsize.com
Thank you for that info, that is very valuable.
I got the perception in your initial posts in this thread that you were somewhat discouraged by the results of US. However, if you gained 0.5BPEL since June, after hitting the septum dead end where nothing works, I would say that 0.5" is an outstanding success. Remember, the whole thing about the US is the possibility to unlock gains for the first time after reaching the septum dead end where everything else has being tried unsuccessfully.
Also, if I am not mistaken, 1Mhz goes deeper than 3Mhz. Specially when the phallus is under tension, it gets thinner. Therefore Kyrpa was using the US with his penis over his leg in an attempt to catch in his leg the frequencies and bounce them back in his penis. With 3mhz that is not needed since from what I read in manko007 tests, 3mhz seems to heat at a depth of 0.8-1cm which would hit this "cord" or septum in a more efficient way.
I got the perception in your initial posts in this thread that you were somewhat discouraged by the results of US. However, if you gained 0.5BPEL since June, after hitting the septum dead end where nothing works, I would say that 0.5" is an outstanding success. Remember, the whole thing about the US is the possibility to unlock gains for the first time after reaching the septum dead end where everything else has being tried unsuccessfully.
Also, if I am not mistaken, 1Mhz goes deeper than 3Mhz. Specially when the phallus is under tension, it gets thinner. Therefore Kyrpa was using the US with his penis over his leg in an attempt to catch in his leg the frequencies and bounce them back in his penis. With 3mhz that is not needed since from what I read in manko007 tests, 3mhz seems to heat at a depth of 0.8-1cm which would hit this "cord" or septum in a more efficient way.
- Joined
- May 31, 2013
- Messages
- 859
Well, I am still researching. Currently there are 2 options. First, eBay. If you search for ultrasound machine, you will find a few with 3Mhz capabilities for around $200. BUT, they are all made in India, and there have been reports of those machines being inconsistent in power output. Without discrediting products from India, I am waiting for more feedback on these machines in order to buy one of those.
Second option, you can go for a sure shot buying the soundcare plus Ultrasound, but it runs around $800.
So thats the situation right now. Alternatively, you can search maybe craiglist or other places for a medical grade used one.
@kyrpa , what do you think would be the ultimate consensus for a US machine? definitely one with 3Mhz capabilities in order to heat faster and attack tissues closer to the surface, or just a 1Mhz with a rice sock, heating pad or IR light? I know at some point it was proposed two 1Mhz machines running at the same time as the best scenario but it is my perception that the theory was impractical.
- Joined
- May 31, 2013
- Messages
- 859
Do you have a link of the $800 device ? I might go for that one then.... I want the best quality.
That is an Indian one. How long have you had it? I know is almost impossible to get into measuring output but do you feel like it is doing what is supposed to do as far as heating at 1Mhz and 3Mhz?
I am more worried about the reliability of the equipment more than the transducers although I agree with you, it would be nice to have different size options.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 124,618
can you zip my zipper for me ?
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- Messages
- 286
Yep, it is an Indian model and I agree, not probably the highest quality but what are we talking, at worst case it is 3 MHz plus/minus 10% instead of plus/minus 3%?
So 3.3-2.7 MHz instead of 3.09-2.91 MHz?
For heating purposes, it works great and although unlike Kyrpa, I am not about to stick a probed up there to take a temperature reading, I have learned how hot it should be.
(Took me almost 4 weeks to increase intensity from 1.2 to 1.9)
I monitor my post workout BPFSL and consistently get readings of plus 2 to plus 3mm longer then my normal BPFSL, so it is heating things up.
All that said tho, when I purchased this unit, I had no idea if I would actually use it and if I threw away a $225 PE tool... well to be honest, it wouldn’t be the first time.
So 3.3-2.7 MHz instead of 3.09-2.91 MHz?
For heating purposes, it works great and although unlike Kyrpa, I am not about to stick a probed up there to take a temperature reading, I have learned how hot it should be.
(Took me almost 4 weeks to increase intensity from 1.2 to 1.9)
I monitor my post workout BPFSL and consistently get readings of plus 2 to plus 3mm longer then my normal BPFSL, so it is heating things up.
All that said tho, when I purchased this unit, I had no idea if I would actually use it and if I threw away a $225 PE tool... well to be honest, it wouldn’t be the first time.
Last edited:
Thanks so much for your input brother.
I might end up getting one of those. That variation is not really critical for gains. The important thing is the temperature and I am pretty sure it does that.
