Trayvon Martin

So you're saying its ok for someone to drive slowly behind your mother/girlfriend/sister/wife for several minutes while she is walking or jogging. And when she gets scared and starts running, that person is within their rights to run after her and capture her? Furthermore, if you mother/sister/wife fights back, its OK for her to be killed, especially if she her facebook page said something that you might not agree with? GTFOH. Your argument doesn't even make good sense.

It shouldn't matter what Trayvon did or didn't do after Zimmerman confronted him. By that point he was probably scared for his life. That is the real definition of self defense. Zimmerman was on the offense by chasing an innocent kid. He doesn't police training, but injected himself in a situation that calls for it.

But for shits and giggles, lets pretend that Trayvon turned the tables on Zimmerman after chased him down. Zimmerman said that he was beating him in the sidewalk and shot him as he was on top of him. Why doesn't Zimmerman have any blood on him. If you shoot someone at point blank range while they are on top of you, you will be bloody as heck. Why does the video of Zimmerman walking into the station not show him in a bloody shirt? Where is the big cut from his head being banged into the concrete
 
koooky;477753 said:
I disagree with you almost entirely here.
Martin does not have the right to beat a man on the ground if that man has not attacked him. You are assuming the gun was drawn. If he only confronted Martin and asked him what he was doing, then there is no right to swing on Zimmerman or beat him on the ground.
The EMT's treated and cleaned Zimmerman's wounds at the scene.
It was a police officer that visually reported the wounds, not Zimmerman.

If there is a stranger in my neighborhood, following him may not be the smartest thing in the world, this I readily admit. But me following him does not give him any right to punch or attack me. That is called escalation. The person on the receiving end of the escalation has a right to self defense and can even regain the right to self defense if he is the initial attacker.

The guy was chasing after Martin after Martin got scared and started running. What would you have done if I was running after you at night time yelling at you? I'm not making this up, its in the 911 tape.
 
Last edited:
You know what they say about arguing on the internet...
I'm about worn out on it. I don't think any minds are getting changed about this subject from either side. I'm really here to make my dick big not to argue about shit
 
magiksock;477759 said:
You know what they say about arguing on the internet...
I'm about worn out on it. I don't think any minds are getting changed about this subject from either side. I'm really here to make my dick big not to argue about shit

haha good on you..
 
The one thing I find very confusing, bizarre really, is all these protestors and their signs. All of them calling for justice for Trayvon. What gives? I mean, didn't someone already serve that little thug justice?

THIS EARNED HIM A TWO-WEEK BAN.

Rather than delete this, I left it in place as an example of the type of trifling, hate-filled, ignorant bullshit that will not be tolerated on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words]. Please, everybody; take note.[/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like it will turn out to be very interesting case. In Britain we have a very intriguing case with a man accused of having his wife killed off on there honeymoon while in South Africa. Occurred in 2010 and the guy is sectioned currently under mental health act awaiting appeals on him being sent to South Africa for trial. Just Google it the surname is Deswani.

A docu was on t.v tonight for 1 hour about it all incl evidence not released before and how on earth this programme was allowed to air is a mystery when a trial has never even started, to me it can damage his case unfairly if anyone in South Africa sees it. Turns out imho the docu doesn't damage him but to me personally shows he is innocent and the taxi driver is a scheming piece of shit wanting to save time in jail by cooperating with cops for less time by jibber jabber on the husband ... interesting case with many twists and turns, kinda reminded me of this one in the states as many little pieces of detail may be the most vital evidence i.e did Zimmerman have the gun already drawn or draw it in actual self defense etc.
 
I saw another case where the police killed a guy in a car that was unarmed maybe happen within the last 2 years I forgot the name of the guy though Mark Duggan I think it was
REDZULU2003;477782 said:
Looks like it will turn out to be very interesting case. In Britain we have a very intriguing case with a man accused of having his wife killed off on there honeymoon while in South Africa. Occurred in 2010 and the guy is sectioned currently under mental health act awaiting appeals on him being sent to South Africa for trial. Just Google it the surname is Deswani.

A docu was on t.v tonight for 1 hour about it all incl evidence not released before and how on earth this programme was allowed to air is a mystery when a trial has never even started, to me it can damage his case unfairly if anyone in South Africa sees it. Turns out imho the docu doesn't damage him but to me personally shows he is innocent and the taxi driver is a scheming piece of shit wanting to save time in jail by cooperating with cops for less time by jibber jabber on the husband ... interesting case with many twists and turns, kinda reminded me of this one in the states as many little pieces of detail may be the most vital evidence i.e did Zimmerman have the gun already drawn or draw it in actual self defense etc.
 
Yeah Mark Duggan was another last year who the cops shot which eventually started the London-Birmingham-Manchester riots. Still no cops been prosecuted for that!
 
Dapper Dan;494407 said:
God damn vigilantes
They just cause trouble


You don't even know the half of it! Believe me.
 
Back
Top