If a guy's clamped girth is X(1) and his unclamped girth is Y(1), what do you suppose is the average time (Tave) required for Y(1)=X(2) (his new unclamped girth)?
Mathematics and Clamping
jqsderrida said:
I don't think you'll ever catch up to your clamped girth. When you clamp, as you know, you force more blood into the penis making it bigger. So if Y(1) unclamped girth is growing, his clamped girth X(1) will always be larger. Anyway, for now I ditched clamping for [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/penis-enlargement-forum/12539-slow-squash-jelq-nothing-give-me-better-expansion.html]SSJ[/words]'s as I feel they give me a hell of alot more expansion.
No, the formula asks for how long, on average, do you suppose it would take before a person's NEW unclamped girth becomes equal to his OLD (or beginning, T= 0) clamped girth? 
jqsderrida said:No, the formula asks for how long, on average, do you suppose it would take before a person's NEW unclamped girth becomes equal to his OLD (or beginning, T= 0) clamped girth?
O, ok. My fault, I really didn't know what X(2) meant, I thought it was a typo or something. But onto the point, I suppose it will become equal after several months or so of clamping.
I should of rigged up a pole to guage people's opinion on this matter. Maybe one the mods can do that....
This seems to change dramatically, even for the same person based on routine. VK made some posts about how he tried clamping everyday, and had huge changes in X with no changes in Y. He then tried clamping less often, and his X actually decreased, but Y began to increase. Just have to figure out something that works for you, and don't focus too much on how big you get in the clamp.
I don't think anyone can really answer this as Penis Enlargement is a non-linear equation. :sjqsderrida said:No, the formula asks for how long, on average, do you suppose it would take before a person's NEW unclamped girth becomes equal to his OLD (or beginning, T= 0) clamped girth?
sikdogg said:
Exactly. Using mathematics in a linear equation is really only possible in a 1 or 2 dimensional phrase. For instance:
x + 2y = 10,
3a + 472b = 10b = 37,
2x + y - 5 = -7 + 4y + 3.
In a 2 dimensional general form we see:
Ax + By + C = 0
In this we call A and B equality to zero
We could also explore Standard, Slope, Intercept, etc.
You could also check out basic calculus. There would be a growth curve to which a function can be applied (if necessary, with the help of some computer algebra program). This function can be differentiated to solve the above based problem. In fact, I'm not even sure what the slop-intercept rambling has to do with non-linear equations. If enough data is gathered a differential equation can be formulated to exactly explain the data.spinner2 said:
A differential equation can be formulated to explain exactly the DATA. Obviously, predictions garnered from the equation will be themselves approximations of value of a greater or lessor degree depending on the representativeness of the DATA.
Or you coud use the Delta quadrant 5 used to calculate the bdy mass to brain ratio on Area 51 when i was working there, but that was a long time ago, i have heard they now more using Proton 10 centrifugel adaptation of Wui''s syethesis of the Delta quadrant, it all depends on the mesmer factor as one very good freind in the Pentagon pointed out. But we will see.