inserting the scrotum in wearing the size genetics extender???

C

commercial

1
has anyone tried inserting the scrotum/testicles in wearing the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words]??

In general, you just put your penis on the base then attach the head piece.

How bout you also insert the scrotum (if it fits) on the base before you attach the head piece?
Will it give more a stretch?
 
That is a very creative idea that I have never heard off! Excellent work. What are your thoughts on it so far?
 
This style does allow a better stretch because you don't have that testicle skin pain. That's how the base of static heavy works. It's got a bigger opening though so that is the only problem with doing it with the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words].

I haven't used an [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] in years, but I know my SS heavy fits the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] upper portion. Maybe SS will just sell you a base.
 
MoreGains123;439378 said:
This style does allow a better stretch because you don't have that testicle skin pain. That's how the base of static heavy works. It's got a bigger opening though so that is the only problem with doing it with the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words].

I haven't used an [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] in years, but I know my SS heavy fits the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] upper portion. Maybe SS will just sell you a base.
Click to expand...

I am going to suggest a larger size base for the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words].
 
so far so good regarding the stretch.. and i find it more comfortable than the usual method.
but the diameter of the base of the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] is somewhat small for me to add padding above and below the base of the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] for additional comfort.
 
Last edited:
doublelongdaddy;439386 said:
I am going to suggest a larger size base for the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words].
Click to expand...
You ought to just contact SS: "This patented base allows the highest amount of pulling force without discomfort."

Maybe they can work with you to make a [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] exclusive product which combines the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] and the SS base or other thoughts you might have. I've always liked dealing with them.
 
Good idea. I will give [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] a ring after the Holiday. I wanted to make a few other suggestions too.
 
doublelongdaddy;439525 said:
Good idea. I will give [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] a ring after the Holiday. I wanted to make a few other suggestions too.
Click to expand...
I was actually referring to Static Stretcher because they state they have a patent on the base design. I was suggesting you create a custom [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words]-exclusive combination with them. I think [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SizeGenetics[/words] sells to a lot of different people and would probably do so with any changes they make.
 
you can't have a patent that forbids [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]SG[/words] to make their base bigger.
 
That's not true actually. You'd be surprised at what can be patented if it's spelled out. Market-specific, purpose-specific patents are held up all the time.

Priceline patented their sales techniques and won in court against competitors. It's specific to selling over the internet.

IGT owns the patent for putting a PC inside a slot machine. It's specific to putting it inside a gambling device.

A man owns a patent for using touch-tones to control *any* remote device. He was clever enough to put the various devices in separate claims. He has made millions off of it. It's was a 1980's patent. I would've thought: "Hey the reason they invented touch-tones in the 1930's was to control a remote device: the phone system." But who am I to second-guess the madness of our patent office and the court system.

You're thinking too sensibly and logically. The court system is neither of those. Remember they argued the meaning of the word "is".
 
MoreGains123;439795 said:
That's not true actually. You'd be surprised at what can be patented if it's spelled out. Market-specific, purpose-specific patents are held up all the time.

Priceline patented their sales techniques and won in court against competitors. It's specific to selling over the internet.

IGT owns the patent for putting a PC inside a slot machine. It's specific to putting it inside a gambling device.

A man owns a patent for using touch-tones to control *any* remote device. He was clever enough to put the various devices in separate claims. He has made millions off of it. It's was a 1980's patent. I would've thought: "Hey the reason they invented touch-tones in the 1930's was to control a remote device: the phone system." But who am I to second-guess the madness of our patent office and the court system.

You're thinking too sensibly and logically. The court system is neither of those. Remember they argued the meaning of the word "is".
Click to expand...

Technically you are right, but in all actuality Penis Enlargement knockoffs are rarely pursued in a court, in most cases (as I have experienced with my affiliates) it is too expensive to pursue these elusive fools.
 
Once I was having an email discussion with the guy at SS and he said they got contacted by some company that started with an 'A' (from Spain, but I don't remember who it was) about company A's Penis Enlargement patent. SS showed them patented prior art dating back to 1901 which would invalidate their patent. They never heard from them again.

He said Penis Enlargement patents are as old as the patent office. Older ones are disguised using other wording but they are obvious in nature. The patent from 1901 had a noose, a spring and a base but stated it was a medical device for correcting penile issues. He said they were hard to find (mis-titled) but very amusing to read as they tried to disguise their purpose so the patent office wouldn't consider them obscene.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top