doublelongdaddy;553461 said:Jesus Loves You and Me!
pdguy;588081 said:You wrote that a year ago today! No reason, I just noticed it.
Are you and the brothers here all Catholics?
I have always wanted to be Catholic but I
was raised Protestant.
prologik;588270 said:DLD as a italian descendent as you I was born in Catholic Roman family (know as the religion of uncut guys too) just joking...hehehe, you know sometimes we forget about Jesus all that things that we learn as we grow up, but is always good to remember and think about God, Jesus, pray... it brings a good vibration for everyone.
doublelongdaddy;588298 said:We can forget sometimes but Jesus never forgets about us! I love being Catholic and having the Italian heritage I have but there is less and less of us around, I only have a couple Italian Catholic friends.
zartan;590355 said:I'm not Italian, but I'm a believing Catholic that never misses Mass.
atheist4sex;620441 said:"Judging by your nickname I can see you even joined just to let us know that you are not convinced"
Don't be silly. I have a [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98]Penomet[/words]. That is why I joined the forum.
"There is nothing to be convinced of"
There are lots of claims in this thread, Jesus loves you, knows what I want and need, will respond to prayers, albeit only vague, non-specific ones (surprise, surprise...) These are claims that I don't believe.
I do find it rather humorously ironic that there is religious claptrap on a site dedicated to hedonism. You know, sins of the flesh, the kind of thing Paul and Jesus preached against. LOL. Like Paul said that basically sex is bad and you should really just be celibate if at all possible, but, gee, if you are just too sinful and horny, he supposes you might as well get married. As a general rule (with many exceptions of course...) atheists know the Bible better than Christians.
doublelongdaddy;620548 said:Since you know the Bible better than me, a Christian, could you please show me one place where Christ preached against sex? Thanks.
Zambrodom3;620562 said:NOW it got interesting! rofl!
doublelongdaddy;620548 said:Since you know the Bible better than me, a Christian, could you please show me one place where Christ preached against sex? Thanks.
doublelongdaddy;620725 said:There will be no answer because there is no place in the Bible where Jesus preached against sexuality. But what do I know, I am only a Minister.
atheist4sex;620752 said:Matthew 19:12:
"For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”
atheist4sex;620752 said:Any other other Bible questions you have?
LOL!!!!
smerc;620786 said:I'm not religious (agnostic), but I can't fathom how any religion would be against sex. How do you expect your religion to survive if people can't have kids.
Anyways. I looked up the term "eunuch" as there are different definitions it seems back then. It leads to either (in bible terms) a gay man or celibate in nature. I'm also sure there is a contradiction in there to negate both.
youknowme123321;620888 said:i also found it to mean a man who has been castrated. either by his own choice or it was forced upon him.
doublelongdaddy;620883 said:Yes and why the LOL, you still have not shown me a single verse where Christ speaks against sex, Matthew is not Jesus.
choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven
atheist4sex;620982 said:LOL!!!! Technically, you are correct, because I doubt anything that is in any of the Gospels was actually said by any real Jesus. But, the verse in question is, according to Matthew, a quotation of Jesus. I'll include the verse before it:
Matthew 19:11-12
Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”
Dude, I've had a thousand similar debates with Christians, that go along these lines:
Me: The Bible says 'x'
Christian: It does not!
Me: Here you are, verse ...
Christian: Ah, but if you use my secret decoder ring, you will find it actually doesn't say 'x'
Trust me dude, you have NO chance of winning this debate. And no, it doesn't impress me that you are a minister. You still have NO chance of winning it.
atheist4sex;620982 said:LOL!!!! Technically, you are correct, because I doubt anything that is in any of the Gospels was actually said by any real Jesus. But, the verse in question is, according to Matthew, a quotation of Jesus. I'll include the verse before it:
Matthew 19:11-12
Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”
Dude, I've had a thousand similar debates with Christians, that go along these lines:
Me: The Bible says 'x'
Christian: It does not!
Me: Here you are, verse ...
Christian: Ah, but if you use my secret decoder ring, you will find it actually doesn't say 'x'
Trust me dude, you have NO chance of winning this debate. And no, it doesn't impress me that you are a minister. You still have NO chance of winning it.
shortdick;621166 said:senseles arguing,God will judge us all and his words are wiser and deeper, beyond our understanding he loves us all, unfortunately not everybody will be welcomed into his kingdom of heaven...
doublelongdaddy;621293 said:When they are getting off they cry his name and when they are about to die they pray his name.
atheist4sex;621341 said:As far as getting off, "oh God" is a learned expression that means lots of things in different contexts. One of those meanings, in proper context is, "mighty fine cum!" If I say, "damn good BJ baby!" do you think I think the BJ came with a helping of damnation???? If I say, "she's got a hell of a pussy" do you think I think it shoots flames? Christians are so funny!
As far as when about to die, that's actually a Christian myth. We don't.
Let me tell you a story. I was flying in a storm in Venezuela. We lost cabin pressure and the oxygen masks came out. The cabin filled with what was actually fog, but, looked like smoke, you couldn't see 2 feet in front of you. Now, truth be told, I probably wasn't in much actual danger. We had oxygen. But, it certainly felt threatening. I didn't call out to God. I was pretty anxious, but, nope, not call out to God.
Humorously, I was sitting next to a Mormon missionary. Young guy. I had just minutes before the loss of cabin pressure told him that I didn't believe his hogwash. I guess he thought God was coming to get me. LOL.
I'll respond in more detail about the "eunuch" quote later.
youknowme123321;621344 said:atheist - you still aren't showing where it is said that sex is a sin. you are just showing us something that doesn't support what you are telling us. and you are saying it proves jesus said sex was sin.
How come you aren't explaining how you interpret this to be supportive of your point?
You realize that of the thousands of similar debates you have had that the religious people you have had them with feel they "won" the debate just like you do lol. You are the exact same thing as they are just with the reverse point.
But please explain how what you shared is proof jesus said sex was a sin. b/c right now even the people who aren't religious or christians (like me) aren't agreeing with you b/c your "proof" is lacking.
thank you
to tell someone to their face something they believe (no matter what they believe as long as that belief doesn't hurt someone) is hogwash is rude and worse then the polite jehovah witnesses who have knocked on my door before. Please tell me you realize you are the exact same as an overly religious person who pushes their belief in that religion on people? it's just you have the opposite point.
atheists are just as funny as the christians you mention.
atheist4sex;621341 said:I'll respond in more detail about the "eunuch" quote later.
doublelongdaddy;621437 said:So lets stop running around avoiding the point, please show me where Jesus states that sex is a sin.
atheist4sex;621485 said:Where did I say Jesus said it was a sin? What I said originally was that Paul and Jesus preached against hedonism, living for physical pleasure. And that it is ironic that this site, a site dedicated to getting a bigger dick (IOW hedonistic) would have religious claptrap. So, try to be more precise about saying what I said, okay?
Now, granted, the proclamations about how terrible the "flesh" is, is more from Paul, not so much from Jesus. Still, you downplay that one quote I gave, in my opinion, only because it supports me, not you. As far as I know, there isn't any dispute among theologians that the "live like a eunuch" quote means to be celibate. It is fair to say that it is disputable as to whom Jesus is recommending this to. But, while the quote is short, the words seem to say it is a general recommendation. Not expected of everybody, of course. But, generally recommended.
The most you can really counter that with is to say it isn't clear. You'd think Jesus, when speaking of something as important as human sexuality, would have been a little more clear, doncha think? Doncha think that if Christ really was God, and the Bible is true, God would have done just a tensy bit better job of explaining things? After all, these things aren't debated just by us here on this site, or just nonbelievers that have trouble understanding. Christians debate all kinds of things, including sexuality.
Most Christian churches teach that all Scripture is god breathed, and equal footing. And scripture interprets scripture. It seems that perhaps DLD doesn't agree with this since he was adamant I find something from Jesus. But, for most Christians, using Paul's writings to clarify or add to what Jesus said is totally fine, scripture interprets scripture. If that is the case, then Paul's teaching on the subject would seem to be worthwhile. Where Paul says he really thinks people should be celibate and only get married if you are just too sinful to avoid sexual pleasure.
I can't help but wonder if DLD wants to avoid going down this route because its not so rosy for him....
atheist4sex;620441 said:I do find it rather humorously ironic that there is religious claptrap on a site dedicated to hedonism. You know, sins of the flesh, the kind of thing Paul and Jesus preached against. LOL. Like Paul said that basically sex is bad and you should really just be celibate if at all possible, but, gee, if you are just too sinful and horny, he supposes you might as well get married. As a general rule (with many exceptions of course...) atheists know the Bible better than Christians.
atheist4sex;620441 said:"Judging by your nickname I can see you even joined just to let us know that you are not convinced"
Don't be silly. I have a [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98]Penomet[/words]. That is why I joined the forum.
"There is nothing to be convinced of"
There are lots of claims in this thread, Jesus loves you, knows what I want and need, will respond to prayers, albeit only vague, non-specific ones (surprise, surprise...) These are claims that I don't believe.
I do find it rather humorously ironic that there is religious claptrap on a site dedicated to hedonism. You know, sins of the flesh, the kind of thing Paul and Jesus preached against. LOL. Like Paul said that basically sex is bad and you should really just be celibate if at all possible, but, gee, if you are just too sinful and horny, he supposes you might as well get married. As a general rule (with many exceptions of course...) atheists know the Bible better than Christians.
youknowme123321;621556 said:that is where you said it. or at least where you made it look like you were saying jesus (and paul) said sex was a sin. so you were saying only paul said it?
you realize no point has been proven except that you misspoke and that led to people asking you to prove your point. Had you not misspoke no one would have asked you for any information. this all occurred after you began pushing your disbeliefs ("not convince") and beliefs on DLD and this forum. we would have all just wondered why you were "hatin"?atheist4sex;621639 said:I accept that I wasn't completely clear. It is more that at least Paul seemed to preach that sexual pleasure was generally frowned upon. But, acceptable if you are just too sinful to avoid it. I do acknowledge this is much more clear in Paul's writings. From 1 Corinthians 7
Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.
...
Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
So, we have the quote by Jesus, that I posted, that is a general recommendation that it is a good idea to be celibate. Then we have from Paul more details, it is better to be celibate. Ideally you should "control yourself" and not touch a woman. I'm really not sure how this could be any more clear that I am correct. It seems to me to be rather cut and dry.
I could go on and quote more from Paul that is more in general about how "flesh" meaning physical pleasures (not just sex...) is bad. But, honestly, this seems to me to be pretty satisfactory to prove my point.
youknowme123321;621641 said:you realize no point has been proven
youknowme123321;621641 said:this all occurred after you began pushing your disbeliefs ("not convince")
atheist4sex;621683 said:I demonstrated my point, that the Bible preaches that it is basically a bad thing to want to enjoy sex. That was my point all along and I demonstrated it.
Since when is posting an opinion on a forum "pushing your beliefs"? Did I come knocking on your door handing you a pamplet? What a hypocritical double standard that it is okay for DLD or anybody else to post their opinion if it is pro Christianity, but if I post my counter-opinion, then I'm pushing my beliefs?
Now, it indeed is true that I'm not just an atheist, I'm an anti-theist. Meaning that I believe that religion is ultimately harmful and needs to be opposed. If you say I'm an a-hole, fine, you're not the first person to say that. LOL. But, the bottom line is, you give pro Christian proselytizing a pass, that's okay. But if I post a counter opinion, I'm pushing my beliefs. Hypocrisy plain and simple.
atheist4sex;621683 said:I demonstrated my point, that the Bible preaches that it is basically a bad thing to want to enjoy sex. That was my point all along and I demonstrated it.
doublelongdaddy;621766 said:No, you twisted your point to accommodate your original claims. No one here is wondering if Saint Paul preached against sex as he did, as did Mathew and many other saints. You said, and I quote: "I do find it rather humorously ironic that there is religious claptrap on a site dedicated to hedonism. You know, sins of the flesh, the kind of thing Paul and Jesus preached against." Can you please show where Jesus said this in the Bible...That is all I am asking and I am getting sick and tired of you avoiding the original claim.
atheist4sex;621639 said:I accept that I wasn't completely clear. It is more that at least Paul seemed to preach that sexual pleasure was generally frowned upon. But, acceptable if you are just too sinful to avoid it. I do acknowledge this is much more clear in Paul's writings. From 1 Corinthians 7
Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.
...
Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
So, we have the quote by Jesus, that I posted, that is a general recommendation that it is a good idea to be celibate. Then we have from Paul more details, it is better to be celibate. Ideally you should "control yourself" and not touch a woman. I'm really not sure how this could be any more clear that I am correct. It seems to me to be rather cut and dry.
I could go on and quote more from Paul that is more in general about how "flesh" meaning physical pleasures (not just sex...) is bad. But, honestly, this seems to me to be pretty satisfactory to prove my point.
doublelongdaddy;621766 said:No, you twisted your point to accommodate your original claims. No one here is wondering if Saint Paul preached against sex as he did, as did Mathew and many other saints. You said, and I quote: "I do find it rather humorously ironic that there is religious claptrap on a site dedicated to hedonism. You know, sins of the flesh, the kind of thing Paul and Jesus preached against." Can you please show where Jesus said this in the Bible...That is all I am asking and I am getting sick and tired of you avoiding the original claim.
youknowme123321;621740 said:none of what you posted was your opinion. you posted what you believe to be true.
youknowme123321;621740 said:Yes, when you go onto someones thread about something that makes them happy and they believe in and you push your counter beliefs it is being just like one of those pushy religious people.
You mean the notifications?JohnCMaxwell said:how do I turn off the noise... omg... lol