Bullshit, it is not urine and I know this because I tested this. I made sure that my girl emptied her bladder completely before sex. When she gushed I collected the fluid and it in no way, smell, taste or consistency was it urination.
^^ This.
Squirt, ..
real squirt ... not the outright premeditated blatant pissing that's prevalent in adult entertainment ..
real squirt is a slick 'milky' substance that is zero % like urine.
I was previously aware of 'another' identical study than the one by Salama, Boitrelle, et al's "Nature and origin of squirting in female sexuality" .. which found very different conclusions..
I was going to make the joke that the above-listed effort had only studied skank-grade (fake squirt) adult entertainment actresses. "Ah Ha .. It's Urine!" .. Well, Duh ...
But it turns out that there are
not two different studies. Rather there is just the one same study and some confusion created by their use of the word 'essentially', and the poorly worded gloss of the study at that particular pubmed page.
(There used to be an hilarious list of researcher fudge phrases on the web .. looked for a minute but couldn't find it again.
"we found" -- "We have no idea what this means, but it happened so we wrote it down"
"it is thought" -- "I thought one thing, another colleague thought something else, we really have no idea"
That sort of thing. Anyway ... it's lol. )
'Essentially' is one of those fudging terms researchers use when their model wasn't very rigorous and/or their findings didn't fit the ingoing bias of one or more of the researchers. Here there was no attempt to pre-categorize the subjects as to whether or not they could actually real-squirt, nor the fluid makeup results of such groups, so the results put everything randomnly in a pile and suffer from combining categories. There can be statistical uses for that but generally it's sloppy science. There was positive evidence found. They should respect the finding of real evidence and recommend additional studies to determine why, rather than trying to relativise the findings in a pile of 'essentially'.
A better explanation of the study can be found
-- here: scientists-confirm-there-are-two-different-forms-of-female-squirt --.
To make a larger point .. the male and female reproductive systems form and differentiate from the same general tissues, this is really obvious from a good comparison picture (which is apparently really hard to find ... let's see if this one will hotlink. It looks on my computer like it will) -->
In case it's difficult to read .. you're looking at a penis and a clitoris
.
.
The way the penis structures are represented (just smaller) in the female as the clitoral glans, shaft, crura, are depicted , .. other structures are analogous as well.
The prostate gland in the male is instead the Skene's gland in the female ... and yeah it produces prostatic-specific antigens, as well as a milky slick pre-cum.
In most chicks this will dribble out more or less constantly during sex in various, but perhaps not obviously noticeable, amounts. In other chicks this can be produced so quickly that it forms a (still small but) considerable reservoir of fluid beneath the spongy erectile tissues covering/forming the G-spot. This fluid can be expressed manually so that it comes out (no pun intended) faster than its normal dribble, or by the squeezing force of the orgasms in chicks with enough fluid production and enough natural uterine and/or Kegel strength.
So .. all told .. there would be 4 possible categories for squirting:
1) Real pure skene's fluid squirt, even if it seems like quite a lot in some chicks (but never more than like an ounce,
tops, at any particular moment).
2) Real squirt .. mixed with various amounts of orgasm-induced incontinence (urine).
3) Soley incontinent urine release from chicks with very sparse skenes production and weak urine retention/weak pelvic floor muscles.
4) Soley
willful urine expression from chicks wanting to gain cheap attention for going 'whoo, look at me "squirt", yee haw!'
So, it's all there. Depends on the chick. With
real squirt it's easy to tell from the look and feel and etc etc, way obviously not urine. Dries differently on materials too. Urine would dry somewhat like you'd spilled some Mountain Dew cola .. sugar, discoloration. Real squirt is more like you spilled some Skim Milk, .. milkier color, obviously some protein present .. chalkier, even at times almost flaky, residue .. etc
MoS Notifier:
@
oldandlively:
