Another size statistic
- Thread starter bigbutnottoo
- Start date
S
stillwantmore
Guest
Does that mean 2%? I'd think that would be a little lower than it should be.
Yes, it would probably be easier to understand seeing it in the mag. I always thought it was 5% over 7", didnt know about 7.2". seems like a lot of falloff, but still possible. I think there is probably a huge falloff somewhere between 7" and 8"
I think it might be higher than that, especially for BP. But hey, I dont mind. Just as dont mind people thinking average is 5.1 inches, rather than the old 6.3. That just means I'm easily in the top 2% ( both for penis size and IQ, imagine that.)
( the exact stat I used to read in some male sexual health book was that 90% were between 5" and 7", with 5% under 5" and 5% over 7". It also had diagrams for small average, mid-average, and large average, approx. 5.25x4.5, 6.25x5, and 7.25x5.5 respectively. Back then I used to compare mine right against the diagram picture.)
yea well when you think of it 2 percent of 6 billion is a lot
Hmm...I don't know that I necessarily buy into only 2% being at or above 7 inches. That statistic sounds far too small to be accurate in my opinion. If it is in fact true, then I can pat myself on the back for being a part of that 2%, but I won't be satisfied until I'm in the top .5%.
It did not say 2% above 7". It said 2% above 7.2"
There is likely a significant difference between 7.0" and 7.2"(maybe not a huge difference, but statistically,yes). I think the farther above average you get, the rarer each 0.1" increment of size level is.
I know there was no source. I was thinking maybe it was Kiinsey, but I dont know.
There is likely a significant difference between 7.0" and 7.2"(maybe not a huge difference, but statistically,yes). I think the farther above average you get, the rarer each 0.1" increment of size level is.
I know there was no source. I was thinking maybe it was Kiinsey, but I dont know.
But a girl isn't presented with a random sample. Some guys are more successful than others. Either by confidence or reputation. So big dick guys probably get to see a lot more action. This increases their representation in the sample. I think that's why girls see a lot of big dicks -- it's just that big dicks get around town a lot more. A hundred girls might get a taste of that same one big dick.
I would guess that to be the point around which things would start to taper off, as there aren't that many guys fortunate enough to have monster cocks. Even here at [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words], just from what I've read, there are many of us that do not have 7.2". I talking non-bone pressed, of course.
Yes, thats another thing. I do tend to think these stats are NBP.
I don't if this has been posted before, but check it out anyway:
http://www.afraidtoask.com/members/frPenis EnlargementNISDATA.html
despite the fact i think their average size is a little big, if you put in 7.2, you'll get a good depiction of how the distrubition is.
http://www.afraidtoask.com/members/frPenis EnlargementNISDATA.html
despite the fact i think their average size is a little big, if you put in 7.2, you'll get a good depiction of how the distrubition is.
I plugged in my own size and then put in various measurements. I was surprised to find out that if you put in an erection length of 5.5", you're longer than 18% of the population. 6.0" is longer than 47.5% of the population. 6.5" is longer than 73% of the population. In other words, 55% of us are right between that 5.5" and 6.5" which shows how significant that inch really is, or rather how significant something outside of this range really is.