Yeah, they're right. I didn't read the whole thing, but the concept is on the mark and I've written about it before.
Excessive exposure to Pr0n can move one's erotic imprint and erotic threshold to things that are too bent to really come across in the real world.
The notion and nearness of intimate contact should be stimulating enough by itself. (On the idea that, sexually, women could choose to just lay there if they wanted ... but the guy actually has to be -interested-.)
If someone moves their erotic threshold from normal (and meaningful) sex --- to instead something more like two of the hottest babes ever doing one another, chained together, while begging to both such each other's assjuice off your cock .... you're probably -not- going to run across that in real life on a regular basis .... or ever.
The way the mind works though, it doesn't take account of whether or not something is particularly real. It assumes that anything is, in an emotive sense, -- real. And regarding the level of relative titillation between normal sex and freakazoid shock sex, people can become desensitized to 'lesser' (normal) levels of erotic stimulation, pursuing instead escalating -nonreal- levels of erotic stimulation.
This can have the effect of damage to pair-bonding as one can become nonhappy with a perfectly good sexual relationship .... mentally/emotionally preferring a higher -nonreal- level of stimulation ... seeking sometimes Pr0n, instead of real sex, when real sex is perfectly available -- or even beginning to no longer -have- erotic response towards real (haveable, findable, normal) sex.
If this seems like a problem at all, and it can become so, try to keep away from extremely titillating levels of visual erotic stimulation .... and/or try to limit yourself to visual imprint types (chicks, etc) that are very similar to whoever you know and/or the 'type' that you generally prefer.
*
I wouldn't pay much attention to that.
