Here's an example. A report comes out explaining that around 25,000-30,000 Iraqis have been confirmed killed by the invasion of Iraq. This number is then confirmed by non-partisan groups and that is the main point of the report and nothing else is said. There is no commentary whatsoever. It's okay to think what you want after hearing or seeing the report, but it's ridiculous to assume that the person relaying the information is completely nuts and only pointing it out to make a point. You can't argue with facts, but you can look at the report and think critically. What is the report about and why is it relevant? What does this mean to me and does it matter to me? How do I feel about this?
More times than not you hear a similar answer to the likes of "Well what is 30,000 lives when it'lli...they need stop right there. You can't rationalize a report about confirmed deaths in Iraq like that. It's a bit sick if you think about it. Not everything in the media is and definitely shouldn't be about political posturing or pushing a political party's agenda. I agree with you Swank. As a whole we just don't have many critical thinkers anymore.
Lambda, what's wrong with being liberal in the first place? I don't even know what your political affiliation is nor have I thought much about it. If you consider yourself to be conservative then why? Do you know why? Whatever you'd consider yourself to be it doesn't matter as far as I'm concerned though. I definitely don't know enough about the things I'm interested in when it comes to politics (yet), but I'm only arguing against the things I see as wrong. Any argument I make is predicated on what I've read and checked for myself. I'm not right all the time like anyone else, but I'd never assume someone to be wrong for an occupation because of their politics. Most PS Professors are liberal you say, yet most of the teachers I've met in the department at my college are fairly conservative when it comes to the national budget and both liberal/conservative when it comes to things like civil liberties. There are times when the ACLU go overboard and I disagree with them and there are times when organizations like the American Conservative Union do something I disagree with. PS Profs when it comes to their job are balanced and the one I had happens to be an investigative journalist and activist, yet when he'd something "liberal" it made sense and was backed by facts that he showed us and other places we could look to on our own for our own verification. When he said something that sounded "conservative" we looked it up and sure enough damn he'd done it again. I suppose having to get nitty-gritty to dig up shit on the CIA and other pretty fun stuff he'd have to be fair minded and open only to the verifiable facts. If he sees the facts and says something like the invasion should not take place back in early 2002 then he obviously knows something many others weren't concerned with to know or at least inquire. Liberal, Conservative? I don't give a shit. If you're pushing facts and they're presented objectively then I'll make up my mind regardless of party affiliation or political ideology.
More times than not you hear a similar answer to the likes of "Well what is 30,000 lives when it'lli...they need stop right there. You can't rationalize a report about confirmed deaths in Iraq like that. It's a bit sick if you think about it. Not everything in the media is and definitely shouldn't be about political posturing or pushing a political party's agenda. I agree with you Swank. As a whole we just don't have many critical thinkers anymore.
Lambda, what's wrong with being liberal in the first place? I don't even know what your political affiliation is nor have I thought much about it. If you consider yourself to be conservative then why? Do you know why? Whatever you'd consider yourself to be it doesn't matter as far as I'm concerned though. I definitely don't know enough about the things I'm interested in when it comes to politics (yet), but I'm only arguing against the things I see as wrong. Any argument I make is predicated on what I've read and checked for myself. I'm not right all the time like anyone else, but I'd never assume someone to be wrong for an occupation because of their politics. Most PS Professors are liberal you say, yet most of the teachers I've met in the department at my college are fairly conservative when it comes to the national budget and both liberal/conservative when it comes to things like civil liberties. There are times when the ACLU go overboard and I disagree with them and there are times when organizations like the American Conservative Union do something I disagree with. PS Profs when it comes to their job are balanced and the one I had happens to be an investigative journalist and activist, yet when he'd something "liberal" it made sense and was backed by facts that he showed us and other places we could look to on our own for our own verification. When he said something that sounded "conservative" we looked it up and sure enough damn he'd done it again. I suppose having to get nitty-gritty to dig up shit on the CIA and other pretty fun stuff he'd have to be fair minded and open only to the verifiable facts. If he sees the facts and says something like the invasion should not take place back in early 2002 then he obviously knows something many others weren't concerned with to know or at least inquire. Liberal, Conservative? I don't give a shit. If you're pushing facts and they're presented objectively then I'll make up my mind regardless of party affiliation or political ideology.
Last edited: