Wow! I didn't even think of that, color me embarrassed. However, I'd say it's still inflated. I've seen maybe just a few penises legitimately in the 8+ category in that picture proof section. I can think of a few members, some former, like Kaution420 who fit into that category, but really, I still think it's symptomatic of the overall "supersizing" trend on the site. It's not a big deal, I don't know why it aggitates so many people to call attention to it. As I mentioned before, I think it's really symptomatic of this whole BP deal. People go wild with that.
I also noticed some simlar effects with the girth poll. That one has a more realistic curve, but there is quite a large number of girths on the absolutely huge side - and yet probably the largest measured girth to ever post is that treepapaniner guy, and he readily admits to being around 6.5" at best.
The fact is, out of a few hundred respondents on each of those, there is a disproportianately large number of very large measurements. If these guys really are around, not many of them are posting a clear pic. All the legit surveys we know of identify these types of sizes as extremely rare, but for some reason this website has six, seven times the average? I'm not even sure, but I am sure that on any website that involves penis size and sexuality, no matter how much we may like it, lots of guys are being really dishonest. It's just sort of a natural maxim for an anonymous environment like this. I just noticed that the poll seemed to support the trend that myself and others had already indentified elsewhere.
Let's think about this - this is a penis enlargment site. Most guys are insecure about their size to a degree no matter how well endowed - but I really doubt the site has attracted an enormous number of really really well-hung guys. I guess I'm the party pooper on this one, as nobody seems to like the idea that guys here are as full of shit as anywhere else on the internet. I don't particularly see what the harm is pointing out the trend. There's about five hundred less useful, less interesting threads floating around, but this topic really seems to rub people the wrong way . . . Honestly I think there is a pretty real reason why many here bristle against anybody who advocates asking anybody for proof when they state an enormous size - they usually can't back it up. It doesn't really hurt anybody, it's just what I've come to understand after spending some more time surfing around on this site.