Thanks for the reply SWM.
I do read and contribute in other forums on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words]. In fact I recently posted pictures in the proof section and I intend to construct a serious Penis Enlargement routine for myself in the near future. A quick look at my posting history will show that I have added comments on a variety of topics.
It seems the issue on FR is confused again - I have no problem with FR. You are correct in saying that I would not go to the
hanger's forum and be critical, because I see no fault or anything objectioniable in the posts I have seen there.
I find many of Kong's claims to be factually incorrect or unsupportable. Some of Kong's claims, so far that I have seen, are not supported by the FR community as a whole, but are simply his own conjectures. It is sheer fallacy to suggest I am against FR or those who are interested in it.
I have called attention to the fact that I find many of Kong's claims to be inaccurate and explained why. In every case this has a created an argument with Kong.
I do not simply call Kong names or needlessly attempt to slander him. The majority of my posts are detailed, carefully phrased explanations of my opinions and my reasoning. I have made efforts to keep it out of the personal arena and remain on topic. It is Kong who has begun the practice of calling any objection to his information, claims, or opinions, as nothing more than personal slander and character assasination. I believe that a reading of the threads in their whole will demonstrate this point.
I have repeatedly suggested that people ought to just read the threads as I feel they vindicate all of my points. I am confident in the quality of my conduct and stand by it. I feel I have kept my tone at a more adult and gracious level than Kong the majority of the time, and a read of the threads will show that Kong himself is a frequent perpetrator of petty insults and less than mature conduct.
So, once again restating my own advice to all, read the threads and see for yourselves. The point here is to have differing opinions, and not just as an occassional novelty objection. The debates have shown that there is a contingent of men who disagree with the factuality and basis underlying many of Kong's claims. The input from a different view ought to be welcome as a greater percentage of men are represented.
Kong is not being slandered personally by virtue of the fact that it happens to be his opinions that I disagree with. If there were others, I would disagree with them as well. If anybody else would like to take up Kong's positions, I am more than happy to defend my stances to any individual. Kong is the main, and often only advertiser of his ideas, so it is him that gets questioned. I would certainly say I have never repeatedly thrown dirt in his face. If I have sunken to pure meanspiritedness, I'd like to see an example of it where Kong had not already behaved in a similar manner. I can show examples where Kong has been needlessly insulting.
I support any man who wants to FR - but I also support factually correct information, open debate, and a variety of opinions. I do not support one person's ideas and claims being the only acceptable opinion, and any vocal and consistent dissent being squashed with threat.
That is essentially what this is all about - Kong is okay with an occassional "I don't think so" here and there, but he is uncomfortable with a consistent challenge and evaluation of his ideas. My opinion is that when you make claims on a public forum, they're open to evaluation and criticism at all times for as long as anyobdy sees fit, so long as the debate is topical and constructive. If I continue to see inconsistencies and questionable claims, I feel no need to censor myself. One always has the choice of if and how they will react.
