Abdiel Bull Berg
Well-known member
It really is. + it’s quite affordable to buy a new tube if you need a bigger one.Great method for length! The Mityvac is extremely versatile
It really is. + it’s quite affordable to buy a new tube if you need a bigger one.Great method for length! The Mityvac is extremely versatile
Good for you brotherman, really think you’ll like the MityVac, I know I do and it’s a big+ that you can monitor the pressure you’re using.
And I do the exact same thing, using a thinner 2 inch tube to focus mostly on length, though it definitely does boost my girth too.
Constantly getting over 8 inches when in the tube, though it has yet to materialize when out of the tube.you getting good length results from the Mity?
One last question- when in the tube how much extra length are you getting. Just cause I don’t know your current lengthConstantly getting over 8 inches when in the tube, though it has yet to materialize when out of the tube.
I believe it’ll get to over 8 inches outside the tube as well once I have started using my MityVac more consistently again. Had a long break from pumping you see, and only started pumping again a couple of days ago.
Though my flaccid already, after only two sessions with the MityVac, hangs both lower and fuller 24/7. Will report back in December when I have been pumping consistently and taken new measurement then.
I’m pretty much 7,8 inches BPEL, so getting almost half an inch of extra length in the tube.One last question- when in the tube how much extra length are you getting. Just cause I don’t know your current length
Yup that's what you want
Yup that's what you want
Slowly filling up the tube (diameter of 4.5cm so converting, it would be 5.5 in circumference)
Excited for soon to come gains
View attachment 1833473View attachment 1833474View attachment 1833475View attachment 1833476
I'm a bit more than 1/2" from maxing-out the length of my 9" MityVac (seems like I've been stuck here for over a year)
I'm a bit more than 1/2" from maxing-out the length of my 9" MityVac (seems like I've been stuck here for over a year)
since I've been 'plateau'd for so long, I'd say the BM for temporary girth...I've been stuck at 8 1/4' and 6 3/4' for what seems like forever. perhaps I've just reached my physical limit?
wow! I have never considered this...can you tell me how 'buffer space' works?Problem is, you're lacking the buffer space at the top. Even though you still have 0.5in at the top, that extra buffer space to allow pulling pressure is required. Normally, around 1.5in of buffer space is needed. Optimal buffer space is around 2in. This is even more essential for the water pumping.
since I've been 'plateau'd for so long, I'd say the BM for temporary girth...I've been stuck at 8 1/4' and 6 3/4' for what seems like forever. perhaps I've just reached my physical limit?
wow! I have never considered this...can you tell me how 'buffer space' works?
since I've been 'plateau'd for so long, I'd say the BM for temporary girth...I've been stuck at 8 1/4' and 6 3/4' for what seems like forever. perhaps I've just reached my physical limit?
I can understand the dynamics of force/object, but the idea of a buffer-ratio is quite intriguing. If I were to aim for that elusive 9" mark, would I need a 12" cylinder to meet that ratio?Let's tackle two fronts. Our brother @9.5inchpro may be in the same predicament as you are, where both of you are hitting a hard limit plateau. I've posted a discussion about this after talking to my colleagues on his log page:
Progress thread Post in thread 'My quest for a ruler dick'
Okay. This is what we've suspected as we discussed based on your posts so far. So, take it with grains of salt when you're reading these recommendation from us.
First off, we always talked about thermal application at body core temperature. However, because your tissues are so dense now, your collagen type I (the stiffer type) is higher than the collagen type III (more elastic). This is why you're not breaking. So all of us express thermal incline from core temp to as high as 110F. It's going to be quite warm. Go higher if you are comfortable and it doesn't cause heat irritation or...
We can go into greater detail where you find a bit of info-lacking.
As for the buffer space, there are three parts to this. First is the buffer space around the penis, that means the spacing between the shaft and the cylinder's wall. Without the extra space around it, the negative pressure cannot pull the internal soft tissues apart to break through the cross-linked or toughened fibrous meshes that are your tunica and septum that make up the blood chambers. The same is true for the head buffer space. If you're only having 0.5in of head buffer space, there's a lack of pressure air volume, or even fluid volume, to pull against your penile structure. Think of the air vacuum volume like an invisible hand that's pulling on your penis. The smaller volume of air slightly around the penile shaft and a larger buffer volume at the top create less pull than the larger volume around the penis and larger head buffer space. The trick is find a balancing air ratio between the penile shaft to the cylinder wall vs the volume buffer space between the top of the glans to the top of the cylinder wall. The ratio should be around 1 to 3.5 or more. Make sure to always pump at the highest erection possible, and keep the erection going.
Second to buffer around it is heat. Heat plays a very critical role in making the tissue layers pliable and malleable. Without heat, the tissues remain cool and dense without proper expansion.
Third is the weakening of the tissues. You already know the game long enough where you have to soften the tissues before lengthening and expanding. Otherwise, you're trying to expand cool and thick tissue walls. The best comparison to this is trying to inflate a hard, thick inner tube rather than a stretched and loose balloon.
Those who are engineers and fluid mechanic specialists will be hammering on this subject.
I can understand the dynamics of force/object, but the idea of a buffer-ratio is quite intriguing. If I were to aim for that elusive 9" mark, would I need a 12" cylinder to meet that ratio?