Raphe

TheJunk

Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2023
Messages
59
So ive a quite big Raphe running down side of the shaft in S's, it presents any limitation on PE such i wonder?
 
Then there is no problem. Skin folds are common throughout the body. Some has it on the face, head, back, neck, between skin folds, and various other places such as genitalia and buttocks. The only thing that may come out of it is a wider band.
 
natural birth i believe since im uncut and all, i will post photo, kinda dark rn but will try.
Don't say uncut. I don't like that definition at all.

Our penis isn't supposed to be cut with a knife and have the foreskin removed. We are born this way and the foreskin has a function. I don't understand why this is normalized in this way.
 
Don't say uncut. I don't like that definition at all.

Our penis isn't supposed to be cut with a knife and have the foreskin removed. We are born this way and the foreskin has a function. I don't understand why this is normalized in this way.
i think is more normalized usa (where i heart such term), and arab and african countires as cultural, europe as where im from i dont thing is a common thing to do even, can be wrong tho, many countries too. what better term should i use for lack of foreskin?
 
You'll be fine.

i think is more normalized usa (where i heart such term), and arab and african countires as cultural, europe as where im from i dont thing is a common thing to do even, can be wrong tho, many countries too. what better term should i use for lack of foreskin?
This is cultural and religion base. More and more families from such culture or religion are moving away from circumcision now. My wife came from circumcision belief, but none of my boys are. My wife and I knew better.
 
i think is more normalized usa (where i heart such term), and arab and african countires as cultural, europe as where im from i dont thing is a common thing to do even, can be wrong tho, many countries too. what better term should i use for lack of foreskin?
There is no lack at all.
It's hard to find a good term because it's so normalized to mutilate the penis in this way.

Maybe I offend some people, but it's also done on women and it's horrible. They don't feel practically anything from having sex. Everything is removed. šŸ˜¢
 
There is no lack at all.
It's hard to find a good term because it's so normalized to mutilate the penis in this way.

Maybe I offend some people, but it's also done on women and it's horrible. They don't feel practically anything from having sex. Everything is removed. šŸ˜¢
girls one is indeed unhuman imo, but yeah its an controversial topic, but for most part, at least on women thing, all agree with the term mutilated, many try with PE get them foreskin back and all.
 
girls one is indeed unhuman imo, but yeah its an controversial topic, but for most part, at least on women thing, all agree with the term mutilated, many try with PE get them foreskin back and all.
We should probably leave the discussion here.
 
Don't say uncut. I don't like that definition at all.

Our penis isn't supposed to be cut with a knife and have the foreskin removed. We are born this way and the foreskin has a function. I don't understand why this is normalized in this way.
Religious act that has no effects on the penis. God gave us a foreskin and what God creates we should appreciate it
 
Back
Top Bottom