- Joined
- May 8, 2004
- Messages
- 2,151
millionman said:AO, as stated before you don't have to "dominate" the score to be a dominant performance. Check the statistics, but at the same time if you watched the games you'd get it. I know you've heard the term, and the score wasn't even that close. Is that indication that the score should have been worse, or that the game was dominated through and through with a few scores to make things look better for the other side?
Statistically, the Seahawks should have won the game, but they fucked themselves on one play and the calls against them hurt a lot too however to say it was home field refs or bias is stupid. It's not like this shit hasn't happened in other big games and even in Super Bowls before. I'm late on all this I know, but the Steelers won and I think it's shit that Holmgren and his bitch ass fans are still whining about the calls rather than looking at their own faults for losing the game. If you can't beat a team in the Super Bowl when the opposition's QB did quite a bit to lose the game for his team (that was not a TD considering the microscopic part of the ball breaching the goal line rule or not from Big Ben). Again the Seahawks statistically should have came out on top, but they didn't make enough plays to offset the penalties whether the calls were questionable or not. It's happened before and it'll happen again. I mean I wanted the Steelers to win somewhat, (I definitely was not rooting for Seattle despite them being from the NFC), but to play like the Steelers did in front of a home crowd...jesus the game sucked in all honesty. But they won. Eat it Cryhawks.
In the end I respect the Steelers, but God I hate them. But oh yeah, there is no way the Steelers dominated the game. Ratings aside, this SB BLEW MY BALLS.