Asked women to pick the perfect size: They chose 6.6X5.3

Manx

0
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
74
I made a poll to try and ascertain an actual ideal size as selected by women themselves.

Women: Specify your ideal penis - Mister Poll

If you average out the results then the mean average ideal penis comes out at 6.6X5.3. It's also worth pointing out that:
A: an 8X6 penis apparently occurs in about 1% of men so; many of the 15% of women who chose this option probably have never even encountered one this size.
B: A penis that is slightly smaller than the ideal size will equate to a slight decrease in pleasure whereas a penis that is slightly too big will equate to a big increase in discomfort. When asked (forums, polls) what is "too big" women will often venture a size like 7 inches (6 inches was the ideal length for roughly half the respondents on my poll). When asked what is too small women will suggest something like less than 4 inches. In other words, the average size is already a lot closer to "too big" than it is to "too small".
C: Similarly a medium sized penis will be perfectly satisfactory to a more "capacious" woman but potentially painful for a "petite" woman. Again, slightly too big is more likely to lead to decreased sexual satisfaction than slightly too small.

All in all you have more to lose by aiming for "too big" than "too small", so we can probably set the ideal size slightly lower.
If you remove the 8 inch length and 6 inch girth votes then the mean average becomes 6.4x5.1 and this seems like a pretty reasonable ideal. In fact if I'd thought to include a 5" length option the average length would almost certainly have been a little lower.

Basically what I'm saying is that the average size and the ideal size are pretty much the same: Round about 6X5. It makes sense right? If the female orgasm is a natural part of sex then why would men evolve to be slightly too small to supply those orgasms? Surely they would evolve to be (on average) exactly the right size? It seems obvious that the average size and the ideal size really ought to be about the same.

If anyone is thinking of getting into PE I would advise 6X5 as a good goal size. I guess you can do what you want with your body, but would point out that out of the women who specified an ideal size only 14% chose 8X6. So if you're already average sized and aiming for a huge penis, you're probably less likely to satisfy the average woman with your goal size than you are with your current size. Food for thought.

Here's a summary of the results. I'll give the results in order of importance (i.e. the questions where the fewest respondents chose "no preference") and the share that the most popular option received from the respondents who did have a preference.

The Perfect Penis:
Foreskin: Circumcised (94% share of 99% of respondents)
Pubic Hair: Shaved or Trimmed (97% share of 99% of respondents)
Glans to shaft size ratio: Mushroom-shaped (96% share of 96% of respondents)
Length: Mean: 6.6, Median: 7, Mode: 6 (50% share of 73% of respondents)
Girth: Mean: 5.3, Median: 5, Mode: 5 (45% share of 72% of respondents)
Ball Hang: Higher than the tip of the penis (88% share of 62% of respondents)
Testicle size: Big (91% of 46% of respondents)

So the most important factors for women are foreskin and pubic hair (where their preference is overwhelmingly for circumcised and shaved/trimmed) and the least important factors are the size and position of the testicles.
 
You just "asked" them? I think that most women have no clue what 6 inches is unless you show them a dildo. I think that would be the best way to ask a women what their perfect size is, by showing them different size dildos. Nice poll though, its probably pretty close.
 
Basically the most popular size dildo sold is 6" x 5" so it all seems to make sense.
 
Manx where did you host this poll and what ages are the women that voted on it and how did you get so many women to respond?
 
Manx;613910 said:
The Perfect Penis:
Foreskin: Circumcised (94% share of 99% of respondents)
Pubic Hair: Shaved or Trimmed (97% share of 99% of respondents)
Glans to shaft size ratio: Mushroom-shaped (96% share of 96% of respondents)
Length: Mean: 6.6, Median: 7, Mode: 6 (50% share of 73% of respondents)
Girth: Mean: 5.3, Median: 5, Mode: 5 (45% share of 72% of respondents)
Ball Hang: Higher than the tip of the penis (88% share of 62% of respondents)
Testicle size: Big (91% of 46% of respondents)

So the most important factors for women are foreskin and pubic hair (where their preference is overwhelmingly for circumcised and shaved/trimmed) and the least important factors are the size and position of the testicles.

I've heard, read and posted this many times. Women prefer a normal size, good looking, clean and healthy penis over a large, sloppy, dirty one.
 
LIGHTNING;613924 said:
I've heard, read and posted this many times. Women prefer a normal size, good looking, clean and healthy penis over a large, sloppy, dirty one.

I really need a sack tuck. I searched before if women found it attractive or appalling and most said they either didn't care or that it was sexy the way a man's sack hit their ass/ETC body part when having sex.
I'm not an older guy, but @ the rate my sack is going, I'm going to have to come to a conclusion someday about getting this taken care of.

Out of all the polls that are coming out. I'm thinking of revising my actual goal, which would be more of a midterm goal for me. Would also put more optimism in me as well.


The poll looks good. May I ask where the women were surveyed from? I take it you posted it on a womens forum or something of that nature?
 
That's all well and good but I personally would rather be more than they expect rather than less. I think most women would love it if their guy dropped trou and had a 7 or 7.5er when they were only expecting 6. Vaginas are so goddamn resilient and elastic that that size should be no problem for most women.
 
tb007;614016 said:
That's all well and good but I personally would rather be more than they expect rather than less. I think most women would love it if their guy dropped trou and had a 7 or 7.5er when they were only expecting 6. Vaginas are so goddamn resilient and elastic that that size should be no problem for most women.

That's really what I'm going for. That awe effect. Also knowing that there is no challenge too tough (in regards to other women that may get off on a bigger dick).
 
Damn, I was the perfect size before I started PE... and I had enough trouble with teethy blowjobs then! :)
 
i also think its worth noting that there isnt 1% of guys with 8x6, theres way less than that! in a room of 1000 guys, the likely stats would be that only 3 guys have an 8 inch+ bp measurement, and 8 guys would have a 6+ girth. this is 99.67% and 99.2% respectively. each measurement is less than 1% of the population in isolation. however, long doesnt guarantee thick and thick doesnt guarantee long, and it usually isnt the case. so when we consider both length and girth together, this makes the coveted 8x6 even rarer than 1%, and the true number wont be known unless a new study is done. its probably in the region of 0.001%!. bit off track i know, but its worth noting in a thread about perfect size and how most guys goals relate to it.
 
emceemonkey;614036 said:
Damn, I was the perfect size before I started PE... and I had enough trouble with teethy blowjobs then! :)

You were exactly @ 5.3" girth? I stopped my goal @ 5.5" which is a 1" increase from my starting. Trying to make things reasonable.
 
jordey;614057 said:
i also think its worth noting that there isnt 1% of guys with 8x6, theres way less than that! in a room of 1000 guys, the likely stats would be that only 3 guys have an 8 inch+ bp measurement, and 8 guys would have a 6+ girth. this is 99.67% and 99.2% respectively. each measurement is less than 1% of the population in isolation. however, long doesnt guarantee thick and thick doesnt guarantee long, and it usually isnt the case. so when we consider both length and girth together, this makes the coveted 8x6 even rarer than 1%, and the true number wont be known unless a new study is done. its probably in the region of 0.001%!. bit off track i know, but its worth noting in a thread about perfect size and how most guys goals relate to it.

though I'm familiar with these stats and strongly endorse reasonable thinking, I always just can't get my head around the image that I should be in this tiny percentile (8,4 BP/6,1). I know at least one friend who has a way longer flaccid than me with prolly similar girth. He may be a shower but I doubt his BPEL will clock in under 8, So statistically this would be a very unlikely case, but nonetheless it's the case. Also I've met one in the gym who has a impressively long and thick flaccid. So despite all stats and the fact that these are only insignificant tokens I still have my problems to believe.
 
Satyr;614072 said:
though I'm familiar with these stats and strongly endorse reasonable thinking, I always just can't get my head around the image that I should be in this tiny percentile (8,4 BP/6,1). I know at least one friend who has a way longer flaccid than me with prolly similar girth. He may be a shower but I doubt his BPEL will clock in under 8, So statistically this would be a very unlikely case, but nonetheless it's the case. Also I've met one in the gym who has a impressively long and thick flaccid. So despite all stats and the fact that these are only insignificant tokens I still have my problems to believe.

you also have to take into account that you will look smaller than others due to the view youre looking at others guys. a guy you deem as the same size as you may be an inch smaller in length and girth. the top angle we see ours from is deceptive. also the guy may be a shower. he may have a 6 inch flaccid and 7 inches erect. even then, if the guy who was similar size to you was 7.5x5.5, thats a pretty significant difference when you get to the bigger sizes. the percentages i noted are from 3 clinical studies of thousands of men, so accuracy is high: http://i.imgur.com/bsNrs1u.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link, Jordey. Regarding the perspective distortion: I can compare it to my own mirror image, so I think I have a pretty good idea what his flaccid size is in comp. to mine. But, yeah, maybe he's an extreme shower, Idk. But with 6" flaccid length you're pretty much on point.
 
Satyr;614086 said:
Thanks for the link, Jordey. Regarding the perspective distortion: I can compare it to my own mirror image, so I think I have a pretty good idea what his flaccid size is in comp. to mine. But, yeah, maybe he's an extreme shower, Idk. But with 6" flaccid length you're pretty much on point.

even so, your mind can distort your view a little as its your own body, just how when an anorexic person looks in the mirror they dont see the real thing, they see a fat person. even then, its statistically unlikely that your friend is a similar size to you in both length and girth, however it is not impossible, just unlikely :)
 
smerc;613933 said:
I really need a sack tuck. I searched before if women found it attractive or appalling and most said they either didn't care or that it was sexy the way a man's sack hit their ass/ETC body part when having sex.
I'm not an older guy, but @ the rate my sack is going, I'm going to have to come to a conclusion someday about getting this taken care of.

The poll looks good. May I ask where the women were surveyed from? I take it you posted it on a womens forum or something of that nature?

38% of respondents had no opinion regarding the ball hang question. Most women think lower hanging balls look gross/weird, but only if you press them for an answer. For the most part I think they don't notice or don't care. I have pretty low hangers and will probably continue to do ball-stretching just because it turns me on. In theory women find it generally unattractive but in practice I'd find that I like having low hangers and my lady-friend would be basically indifferent to them. So it's not worth me worrying about.

If your low hangers don't bother you then I wouldn't alter them. One of the main conclusions of this poll is that women are largely indifferent to a man's balls.

Also the link to the poll is in the second line of the post.
 
Manx;614111 said:
38% of respondents had no opinion regarding the ball hang question. Most women think lower hanging balls look gross/weird, but only if you press them for an answer. For the most part I think they don't notice or don't care. I have pretty low hangers and will probably continue to do ball-stretching just because it turns me on. In theory women find it generally unattractive but in practice I'd find that I like having low hangers and my lady-friend would be basically indifferent to them. So it's not worth me worrying about.

If your low hangers don't bother you then I wouldn't alter them. One of the main conclusions of this poll is that women are largely indifferent to a man's balls.

Also the link to the poll is in the second line of the post.

Great polls Manx. I also went to the Mister poll site and saw your other poll. As we can see, everything relates between the two different polls.
As far as ball size, I lean towards thinking that women see balls like how men see hips for breeding. Women probably see bigger balls as being more probable to reproduce than small balls.
 
LIGHTNING;614116 said:
Great polls Manx. I also went to the Mister poll site and saw your other poll. As we can see, everything relates between the two different polls.
As far as ball size, I lean towards thinking that women see balls like how men see hips for breeding. Women probably see bigger balls as being more probable to reproduce than small balls.

i think it goes both ways - small would be of putting as would very large and low hanging.

as for the size in the title, is it based just off of womens visual perception? if so it may actually be slightly lower than these numbers, no?
 
Back
Top Bottom