badbal said:
All sports should have a salary
cap. Keeps all the teams competitive. NFL has had it for a long time and they are not doing to bad
And some players (only really good ones!!!!!!!) make big bucks 6+ million a year. NHL will become a better sport because of it.
Yeah, but the salary
cap in the NHL is not going to be as effective as it is in the NFL. If the goal is to keep all teams competitive, the salary
cap should be low enough that most any viable market can be there. The purpose is that every spends the same. If I'm not mistaken, I think the top payroll in the NHL were around 55M give or take a little and I think the lowest teams was around 28M. Well, even with the
cap being set near 40M how is the bottom team going to scrape up an extra 12M and stay financially sound? It won't happen. Don't get me wrong--it's nice that the bottom teams will face a Red Wings or Avalanche team with a 40M payroll, rather than a 50M payroll, giving them a little less star power to overcome. I guess I'm trying to say it's a huge step in the right direction, but I'm not sure everything has been solved long-term. Either way, I'm glad to have my hockey back.
As for that NFL and the
cap, I thought years ago when it was enacted that it would dramatically alter the game and it really hasn't done so. Look at the teams that have made the playoffs several times since the
cap went into action: Philadelphia, Green Bay, San Francisco, Dallas, Pittsburgh, Denver, Minnesota, and other teams that have historically been pretty successful more often than not over the last 20-25 years. On the contrary, teams like Arizona and Cincinnati have been unable to escape the bottom ranks, despite a
cap. To me, it goes to show that great organizational leadership cannot be overstated.