I think we can go to the Moon

[kausion_420]

Here is a clip from a video I have and got from the open source. I quickly ripped it and split it so that it was small enough to put onto a free server.

Also I used a shareware splitter so there is a bit of interruption. I can send you the original if you would like but this one is good enough.

HAHA can't wait to see the comments I'll be getting for this one.

Moon Clip

 

[derringer57]

isnt working =(

 

[BeBobBox]

so we never landed on the moon or wut?

 

[kausion_420]

so we never landed on the moon or wut?

I've always believed that the first moon landing was a hoax deep inside just like I believe other things happening right infront of us.

Just a matter of finding the links and drawing your own conclusion I guess.

 

[kausion_420]

isnt working =(

You may have to right click the link and "Save Target As"

 

[VladtheImpaler]

so we never landed on the moon or wut?

Damn straight, people will die....
I had a retarded argument about this the other day.....

If only i could find the END ALL ARGUMENTS LINK

yeah that link didnt work for me

 

[kausion_420]

Dammit!

Anyone know of a free hosting site that will let me upload something and not delete it because of content?

 

[kausion_420]

Let's see if this works. This server isn't the best but at least it doesn't ban content.

Moon Clip

 

[Stuff_]

I also think they did not make it to the moon, but my internet connection is being so slow right now it is almost non-existant. I'll have to check the clip out later, it sounds interesting.

 

[VladtheImpaler]

Holy shit, I didnt watch the clip before cuz something screwed up but.....damn thats some good hard proof aint it.....
I need to find that other link...

The American public must be brought Justice!!!!

 

[kausion_420]

Im going to start saving the documents and such that I scour through instead of keeping them in my mind and start showing people what is going on as most think im crazy.

 

[Texan]

If the moon landing weren't real there would have been a lot of people at NASA coming up dead to bury the secret... like the many of the key people who saw JFK get eliminated had all kinds of crazy ass deaths.

 

[kausion_420]

I can't say for sure that they never did land but I do believe the first landing was fraud. That is just my personal opinion no need for debate.

I read about a lot of people having crazy deaths. Well they claim they are suicides I know of 2 in the last 6 months.

I guess it all depends on what a person believes. Majority of American's believe a man in a cave was able to have NORAD stand down as they fly planes into buildings. There is only one way to have NORAD stand down and well a man in a cave just doesn't have that kind of authority.

The same people also believed the news when they said they were able to find one of the key hijackers passports under all the rubble and magically come up with pictures of all the supposed hijackers 2 days later. Keep in mind for a passport to be found in perfect condition after smashing through steel beams, walls, bathrooms, elevator shafts in a plane that exploded then came crashing down with a mother load of steel,drywall, concrete etc.. is highly unlikely. People believe it though and they believe that if you give up your liberty you will get security. I know that if you give up your liberty suddenly there is no more terror attacks though. But then you got worse problems.

All you can really do it put pieces together and gather info from all different angles to see if any of them link up. Or if one source picks up on something that made no sense somewhere else. The most crucial part that most people ignore is using common sense.

 

[VladtheImpaler]

The same people also believed the news when they said they were able to find one of the key hijackers passports under all the rubble and magically come up with pictures of all the supposed hijackers 2 days later. Keep in mind for a passport to be found in perfect condition after smashing through steel beams, walls, bathrooms, elevator shafts in a plane that exploded then came crashing down with a mother load of steel,drywall, concrete etc.. is highly unlikely.

Is that seriously what they fed the public????? :O :O :O
thats like a kinda lie a five year old would tell their parents....
Along with what you said, Wouldnt you say anything within 3 stories of the blast would be absolutely incinerated.....It was the heat that melted the beams down for fucks sake ....lol unbeleivable

 

[kausion_420]

It was the heat that melted the beams down for fucks sake ....lol unbeleivable

Also keep in mind that the hottest type of flame is the blue flame. I know that from work experience. A blue flame is the closest type of flame that would be able to melt completely through 6 inch steel beams.

The flames produced from the plane would not have gotten hot enough to be blue flames that much is certain. But I guess even if regular flames could somehow melt through steel the building wouldn't come down like a controlled demolition.

Not to mention if there is a terrorist threat you want to save as much evidence as possible.. that's the law. Since it is the law to keep evidence makes one wonder why the scrap metal from those buildings was sold to foreign countries for a low price.

Never underestimate the intellegence of the mainstream public.

 

[VladtheImpaler]

Also keep in mind that the hottest type of flame is the blue flame. I know that from work experience. .

I know that from smoking Bong tokes....Only jet lighters from now on

Never underestimate the intellegence of the mainstream public.

Doesnt this contradict everything you teach, master????

 

[kausion_420]

I meant that sarcastically... lol

It is actually a quote from someone else who meant it sarcastically only it was:

"Never underestimate the intellegence of the American Public"

 

[kfarrelldba]

Im going to start saving the documents and such that I scour through instead of keeping them in my mind and start showing people what is going on as most think im crazy.

I don't even think Iraq exists. Prove it to me. So a plane lands in Iraq and the pilot says "ok, we've landed in Iraq" but have you?

When I use to watch the news, and see the cases that make it into court, the bills being passed, the guberment and its ass backwards operations I was convinced for months that I flashed back to a bad acid trip of a bad movie rerun that would not end. I'm on the Kausion train for sure. You guys really want to get ya heads spinnin? Check this out lol lol lol lol lol lol

Now, keep an open mind and listen to what they have to say, most of which is unbiased fact. Listen to the description of a conspiracy theory at the beginning and then watch what they have to convey.


Click here ROBOTS

 

[prince Albert]

If the moon landing weren't real there would have been a lot of people at NASA coming up dead to bury the secret... like the many of the key people who saw JFK get eliminated had all kinds of crazy ass deaths.

There is a good documentary that was shown here in the uk,about the moon conspiracy and in part of it it mentions several top people who all died from mysterious accidents.

Some of the points they made were.

How does the flag flutter when there is no gravity or wind on the moon.

Why are the shadows pointing in several directions when there is only one light source the sun,some of the pictures taken had shadows pointing in different directions in the same frame suggesting several light sources.

Back in the 60s sending a tv signal more than 60miles resulted in poor picture quality and yet they managed to send tv pics 150,000 miles.

Most important how did they manage to pass throught the Van Allen radiation belt without harm.

There are many more examples.

 

[Shithead]

i think that movie is meant to be a joke, regardless i don't think america ever landed on the moon, my main reason for thinking this is because america had way too much of a reason to fake it.

 

[Texan]

There is a good documentary that was shown here in the uk,about the moon conspiracy and in part of it it mentions several top people who all died from mysterious accidents.

Some of the points they made were.

How does the flag flutter when there is no gravity or wind on the moon.

Why are the shadows pointing in several directions when there is only one light source the sun,some of the pictures taken had shadows pointing in different directions in the same frame suggesting several light sources.

Back in the 60s sending a tv signal more than 60miles resulted in poor picture quality and yet they managed to send tv pics 150,000 miles.

Most important how did they manage to pass throught the Van Allen radiation belt without harm.

There are many more examples.

First of all, there is gravity and wind on the moon. It's not the same as earth's gravity and wind, but there is still gravity and wind.

Second, nobody denies the event was filmed; it is perfectly logical to assume there were other lights at the scene. Why would they need lights to film a fake, but no lights to film the real thing? That doesn't make sense.

As for the TV signal thing... I don't think NBC was using NASA equipment to broadcast Dick Van Dyke or Gunsmoke.

As for the Van Allen radiation belt... why do you think they couldn't pass through it without harm? If it is that harmful, perhaps the measures that keep the suns direct UV radiation from cooking them, or kept them from burning up exiting/entering the earth's atmosphere also blocked that radiation, or at least blocked enough radiation to make their brief exposure harmless. It's not like they lived in the radiation belt for a month.

It's all a matter of what you want to believe, plain and simple. I am not trying to ridicule anyone for their beliefs... I personally believe there was a cover up in JFK assassination.

 

[Shafty]

First of all, there is gravity and wind on the moon. It's not the same as earth's gravity and wind, but there is still gravity and wind.

Second, nobody denies the event was filmed; it is perfectly logical to assume there were other lights at the scene. Why would they need lights to film a fake, but no lights to film the real thing? That doesn't make sense.

As for the TV signal thing... I don't think NBC was using NASA equipment to broadcast Dick Van Dyke or Gunsmoke.

As for the Van Allen radiation belt... why do you think they couldn't pass through it without harm? If it is that harmful, perhaps the measures that keep the suns direct UV radiation from cooking them, or kept them from burning up exiting/entering the earth's atmosphere also blocked that radiation, or at least blocked enough radiation to make their brief exposure harmless. It's not like they lived in the radiation belt for a month.

It's all a matter of what you want to believe, plain and simple. I am not trying to ridicule anyone for their beliefs... I personally believe there was a cover up in JFK assassination.

Texan, how is there wind on the moon? I'm not saying that I have any doubts regarding the authenticity of the first moon landing, but the last time I checked, the moon didn't have atmospheric phenomena of any kind. Not wanting to sound like a smart ass, but please elaborate, in case I misunderstood what you were referring to.

 

[Shithead]

there is no wind on the moon, but there also would have been no wind in a big studio.

 

[Texan]

there is no wind on the moon, but there also would have been no wind in a big studio.

There is wind on the moon, contrary to Shithead's end-all declaration.

This is what I was talking about. As I said it is different from earth wind. Click here.

 

[Shithead]

k, ya proved me wrong, but it is very very different wind to what we have on earth.

 

[kfarrelldba]

Im going to start saving the documents and such that I scour through instead of keeping them in my mind and start showing people what is going on as most think im crazy.

I don't even think Iraq exists. Prove it to me. So a plane lands in Iraq and the pilot says "ok, we've landed in Iraq" but have you?

When I use to watch the news, and see the cases that make it into court, the bills being passed, the guberment and its ass backwards operations I was convinced for months that I flashed back to a bad acid trip of a bad movie rerun that would not end. I'm on the Kausion train for sure. You guys really want to get ya heads spinnin? Check this out lol lol lol lol lol lol

Now, keep an open mind and listen to what they have to say, most of which is unbiased fact. Listen to the description of a conspiracy theory at the beginning and then watch what they have to convey.


Click here ROBOTS

 

[Texan]

I watched this video last night (by following the link). It was interesting, but silly in many ways. I would like to know what he thinks happened to the commercial airliners, since he doesn't think they hit the buildings.

His little intro was cute... about "conspiracy theory" and how he builds assumption on top of assumption and then just starts basing other premises on them as if they were facts... he a clever manipulator.

I don't buy into what he said, personally. Big surprise to you guys, I'm sure.That said, I will not say it couldn't have happened that way, I just don't think so... but I'm wrong often, just ask my wife

 

[kausion_420]

Was an alright 9/11 documentary. I didn't really like the focus on it though. There are more important issues that can be proven with documented evidence yet he focuses on a possible missle hitting the pentagon..??

Why focus your time on something you can't prove one way or another. To me that is a true conspiracy theory. If he would have shown documents that were passed after 9/11 like [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]PA[/words]/HydromaxS or documents from before 9/11 like W199I/PNAC/RAD, then he would have made a better case.