Has Foreskin Restoration Made Your Balls Hang Lower?

[kong1971]

I'm going to be posting some polls over the next few days to see what we can honestly claim as benefits directly attributable to foreskin restoration. Your answers will be visible to all members, as I do not want any haters skewing the results. There seems to be some contention concerning FR benefits. Please be as objective as possible. There are some here who claim that our experiences are psychosomatic.

First Poll:

HAS FORESKIN RESTORATION MADE YOUR BALLS HANG LOWER?

Feel free to share your experiences and opinions concerning this topic.

 

[Shithead]

if the argument is that the experiences have been psychosomatic, then these polls do nothing to prove that wrong.

and these polls really don't accuratly show what you could "honestly claim as benefits directly attributable to foreskin restoration".

 

[kong1971]

Hello, shithead. I'm glad to see that you've finally decided to restore your foreskin!

I'm not really trying to prove anything to anyone with these polls. Not very hard, at least. I just felt it would be interesting to see how many restorers are experiencing the things we have been told we would from FR.

I know, in my case, my balls are definitely hanging lower, but it's not that my sack is actually larger, it's just not pulled up the shaft as far. Well, actually, it does seem like my sack is bigger, now that I think about it. Perhaps that could be from increased blood circulation or something.

Ideas, anyone? Theories?

 

[MDC]

I voted no, but not because I don't think FR could do it. I've done other things to get mine to hang lower which worked.

 

[against_odds21]

I voted yes. With minimum FR I noticed almost right away my sack hanging a little lower. For me this is an undesireably effect. I don't want my sack hanging to my knees by the time I'm 40. I don't like low hanging balls. It just doesn't appeal to me. I think the length of my dong would be more emphasized with a tighter sack, instead of a low hanging sack.

On the other hand I would say that the size of my balls has increased or seems to have increased. I dunno why they would seem bigger. I would think more skin, would make for more loose skin, but to me it seems like my balls are bigger. It could be attributed to the fact I wear boxer briefs a lot more now and since its warmer down there they would be bigger due to that, but I just don't think so.

 

[kong1971]

Could be that it is a response to the testicles being slightly further from the body. I know that the tesicles produce more sperm at lower temps, so perhaps it is a reaction to the male producing more sperm. I know my loads are slightly bigger and that I also precum more.

 

[MDC]

I voted yes. With minimum FR I noticed almost right away my sack hanging a little lower. For me this is an undesireably effect. I don't want my sack hanging to my knees by the time I'm 40. I don't like low hanging balls. It just doesn't appeal to me. I think the length of my dong would be more emphasized with a tighter sack, instead of a low hanging sack.

I'll be 40 in a few years and mine are nowhere near hanging too low and I've been trying to get them to hang low for several years. There's zero chance you'd go high and tight to seriously dangling balls from FR. If anything, they'll hang where they are supposed to be.

On the other point, guys with big penises and tight balls look ridiculous. Makes it look like a dildo with a bulb at the bottom instead of a penis. I watched several hours of pornos the last few days and I really did notice this on a few ot the guys. It's like they didn't even have a scrotum when they had an erection. Yes, they were circumcised. I was also surprised to see that about half of the guys in the pornos were uncirc'd. Surprisingly, their balls looked normal in every case..

 

[against_odds21]

I was just using 40 for an example. Just meant an older age.

Totally agree with how stupid it looks when a guy has a huge donk, but almost no scrotum. I won't have to worry about that. The hudge donk on the other hand...

 

[kong1971]

I think pornos are mostly shot out west, like California. California has a pretty low circ rate compared to the midwest and the south.

 

[MDC]

If I had to guess, I'd say 99% of adult entertainment shot in the US is shot in the Los Angeles area.

 

[kong1971]

I think it is almost half and half, there.

Once you become aware of this issue, you will probably notice several things. You will notice that many of the larger cocks in adult entertainment are uncut. You will notice that uncut men tend to perform better-- not as much time flogging a half hard dong with some hot chick waving her poonanny in his face-- and you will notice that they also seem to get "more into it".

 

[Priapologist]

Kong,

I need to change my vote: from No to Yes. About a week ago I noticed that a reduction in hair encroacHydromaxent and turkey neck had occurred. I guess that this is from the alternative restoration (CW and manual) that I was doing during May, since it focused more on the base skin. Whatever the cause, my scrotum is now hanging lower on the shaft.

Cheers!
Pri