I posted something then erased it. I made no sense at all haha. I was thinking we should do a survey on whether or not you were circumsised first then do this one. If it turns out the vast majority here are one or the other than it wouldn't serve this poll's purpose to even look to the percentages really. But I think this is a good poll. I'm circumsised and have gained 1 inch in length .
Circumcised, tightly before Penis Enlargement. Gained 2.25" of length so far. Skin is a lot looser now, mildly resembles non circumcised penis in that I can pull the skin all the way over my glans when erect. Skin bunches up behind the glans when flaccid but does not cover the glans.
This response is not intended to be negative, as I have participated in all the recent polls regarding this subject.
How will you factor in time frame. Who has gained better: the uncut guy who gains 2" in two years or the cut guy who gains 1" in 6 months? The poll would say the uncut guy because it does not consider time.
I am not arguing with the validity of a poll, or saying they prove or do not prove anything. Without a time frame, there is no need for a poll. DLD is cut and has gained 4+". Anybody cut or uncut compare to that?????
And I do not buy this bullshit he is a freak and putting him in a different category. Does making a commitment and working your ass off to achieve something make one a freak????? It might make you an exception to the rule, but not a freak.
Yes, but there are so many variables that can be taken into consideration, what's the harm in taking one more variable into consideration? Especially one that, unlike genetics or fast healing time, can actually be modified to your advantage like amount of skin.
Sorry, I see a definite trend. Talking averages, circums gain about 1 while uncircums gain 1.5. That's a half inch difference so far. I think the difference is that the extra play allows for more force to be applied to the ligs before pain from stretching skin makes the Penis Enlargementer lighten up.