Because of Penis Enlargement, I have a full foreskin restoration. Started it when I began pulling the skin over the glans and eventually it fully covers. Do I like it, no. Would I like to be circumcised again, you bet. But, it is the way I am now. I would not recommend the circumcision restoration. GS
 
That last one was directed towards kong. This one is for GS: Why don't you like it? And is the skin tight to your penis or does it hang crappiely?
 
But why? Don't be offended, but everyone who doesn't like it seems to ring in on it...but they give no real reason except they think it's ugly or something. As I am doing it myself, I would like to hear the cons as well, because I don't want to get done with it and be disappointed I did it because of something I did not think about.

Perhaps it is because there is no increase in sensitivity and pleasure. Do you have any remnant of your frenulum left? Have you noticed any increased sensitivity in the glans?
You can't say don't do it just because you don't like it.
 
sikdogg said:
Check out the TLC Tugger: http://www.tlctugger.com/

They also sell a cone that will do what you're doing with tape. It's real easy, you just pull the skin over the glans and put the cone over it. It stays in place really well. The tugger is a two-piece device that allows you to put constant tension on your foreskin to accelerate the restoration process. It is the vented version of Supra's ADS.

BeBobBox, i'm in the LA area.

I'm a little confused about the cone from that website because one of their products has a cone with a hook on it and they sell straps to use to pull the skin, but you said that there is one that you just pull the skin forward and put the cone on top and that's it.

If I would have to use the one with the hook then I dont think i would be interested cause I dont have the time to basically hang to restore my foreskin. The other sounds a lot more simple but I wanted to make sure that they sell one like that and that would be all i would have to do(pull skin and wear cone). Do you know the specific name of it by any chance?

Don't know if this all makes sense to you. I just wanted to make sure i understand all of this well before buying anything.

thanks
 
kong1971 said:
But why? Don't be offended, but everyone who doesn't like it seems to ring in on it...but they give no real reason except they think it's ugly or something. As I am doing it myself, I would like to hear the cons as well, because I don't want to get done with it and be disappointed I did it because of something I did not think about.

Perhaps it is because there is no increase in sensitivity and pleasure. Do you have any remnant of your frenulum left? Have you noticed any increased sensitivity in the glans?
You can't say don't do it just because you don't like it.

Okay, I will tell you...first I don't like the smell. It is very hard to keep clean and for these many, many years, I was circumcised and it was clean and easy to take care of. Now, when you urinate, you have the constant problem of having to pull the foreskin back and then you still get the residue. Next, I have a lot of foreskin over the glans and it is not tight, very floppy. Although when I have the "turtle" effect, it shrinks very much like a normal foreskin. I must have had some of the muscus membrane left because I get a very glassy film over the glans. Is the glans more sensitive, no. I can't and don't see the differenance. I have an intact frenulum, so that was and is not a problem. Sex is good, but the foreskin isn't a positive factor. So, this is my observations. GS
 
Thats making me think twice about starting to restore my foreskin...
 
What is it like when you use a condom? Do you pull the skin back?
 
GS: I noticed the smell a couple times. Not bad, really. Just...musky. I, of course, washed it. I do not have enough 4skin to interfer with urinating but I take it you just skin it back before you go. You really sound as if you were very loosely circumcised in the first place and so do not notice a large increase in sensitivity. Age may also play a factor. I am 33 and my glans had completely keratinicized, leaving me with almost no sensation. I do not know you so I do not know your age or how often you have sex or anything like that, which might also influence your opinion. I have been married for 10 years, had sex regularly, and so noticed how much diminished the sensation was. I have found that most men who are circumcised do not know what they are missing, and most men who are not have no idea what they would be giving up if they had themselves circumcised. It is really two different worlds, and only the ones who have restored can really say how big a difference it makes. Just ask Supra, who is also restoring. He will tell you the same thing!

BBB: Ask Supra what he thinks if you don't believe me.

J1: I have been married for 10 years and very rarely use condoms (just for oral if I plan to complete...wife hates the juice). I gather you skin it back before applying the condom, but I'm not certain. Don't have enough 4skin yet to be a problem.
 
Yea, I think im going to wait till im older. Right now its already sensitive enough and id think skin would be in the way. When im older and say married or somethin then ill getmy foreskin restored so when have sex without condoms itll be great
 
Pick your choice, but I tell you it is better circumcised. I am very sexually active. It took several years to get the foreskin totally covering the glans. You will remember what I am telling you. As for those of you who, like Supra, are restoring, you are not restored so you don't have a clue what you are going to experinece when you get restored. As to sensitivity...do I now notice a difference? Not really. Sex and sensitivity was good before and still is, but as to more sensitive...with the foreskin. I don't think so. I have had a total foreskin now for a couple years. I guess you could say that my foreskin is not as tight as an uncut man, but it surely covers totally. When erect, my glans is totally exposed. You can do the restoreing, and I wish you well. I only give you my observations, for experience. GS
 
GS: Thanks for posting your thoughts and experiences. I am not really shooting for full erect coverage, just enough to cover the glans while flaccid to maintain sensitivity and protect it from irritation against clothing. Judging from what ���� I've seen (euro stuff) most men peel back when erect anyway, just how it works. I would really like to see a flaccid pic of your equipment (wow, that sounded weird). I am curious to see how it looks fully restored.

You have to admit, though, that not every man is in your situation. There are men who are circumcised very tightly, leading to problems with bent and painful erections, turkey neck and hairy shafts. There are also many, many men who have lost sensitivity due to keratinization of the glans. For these hundreds of thousands of men who did not get a good circ, restoration can possibly eliminate their problems.

I myself have many of those problems. Hairy dick, turkey neck, bent erections. If I have sex with a woman on top, it is painful to me to the point of losing my erection. I had almost no sensation in my cock due to keratinization of the glans. My frenulum ( the most sensitive part of the foreskin) was snipped off and ended up in a couple pieces between my head and the circ scar. All these very real problems to fix some supposed bad smell? That's like cutting off your nose to fix sinus problems.
 
kong1971 said:
GS: Thanks for posting your thoughts and experiences. I am not really shooting for full erect coverage, just enough to cover the glans while flaccid to maintain sensitivity and protect it from irritation against clothing. Judging from what ���� I've seen (euro stuff) most men peel back when erect anyway, just how it works. I would really like to see a flaccid pic of your equipment (wow, that sounded weird). I am curious to see how it looks fully restored.

You have to admit, though, that not every man is in your situation. There are men who are circumcised very tightly, leading to problems with bent and painful erections, turkey neck and hairy shafts. There are also many, many men who have lost sensitivity due to keratinization of the glans. For these hundreds of thousands of men who did not get a good circ, restoration can possibly eliminate their problems.

I myself have many of those problems. Hairy dick, turkey neck, bent erections. If I have sex with a woman on top, it is painful to me to the point of losing my erection. I had almost no sensation in my cock due to keratinization of the glans. My frenulum ( the most sensitive part of the foreskin) was snipped off and ended up in a couple pieces between my head and the circ scar. All these very real problems to fix some supposed bad smell? That's like cutting off your nose to fix sinus problems.

Well, when you get a full foreskin, you will find that after being circumcised, the work to keep clean is very intense. Coming from a circumcision point of view, to now dealing with the foreskin, it is definitely an issue. Sure you pull back the skin to urinate, but it is not just that easy. You seem to always get a drip or two into the foreskin area and that creates a smell. Then, there is the odor that comes from the mucous that the foreskin creates as a lubricant over the glans. If you are looking to get a "hummer" as part of foreplay, then you are going to have really work to keep clean and smell good. It just takes more time. Sometimes I was a couple times a day because I don't like the smell. Uncut guys might know more about this than I do, but having been cut for so many years, it is just different and more work.

I am covered totally when flaccid so I am sure the glans is protected and I derive some "re-sensitiveity" from this. I don't seem to notice it with regard to reaching a climax or coming sooner.

I seem to be very fortunate to have had a good circumcision. I still have a totally intact frenulum. Also when the foreskin restored, there was still some mucous producing cells left. I can only imagine when you refer to a "botched up circumcision" and the problems it creates. Here is a picture from some time ago posted on MOS. http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=908 GS
 
Awesome! Thanks! Man, you don't know how jealous I am. I know you hate the hassle of cleaning and all that, but that it exactly the way I would like mine to look. It is funny the way people like different things. I don't care if it smells. I want the protection and the sensitivity...and you have to admit, it looks pretty thick hanging like that. It is a beast.
 
Very interesting thread Kong!

I don't know if I have been circumcised or not but my ex girlfriends ask if I have so they must think I have.
While flaccid my glans are completely uncovered.
I quite like the way it looks but if it improves sensitivity and sex I would think it would be worth it. I have a turkey neck too and am wearing a metal ball weight to help get rid of that.
I have a ventless tugger that I used to hang with so maybe I could just use the cone to restore my foreskin instead of tape.
 
Im getting hair growth on my shaft. If that because of circumsicion?
 
I would say that, yes, it is. On the plus side, it is probably because you have gained some length-- so good for you! Unfortunately, due to being circumcised tightly, you probably do not have enough slack shaft skin to take up the extra length, so it has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is your pubic/scotum area. Are you also noticing turkey neck? The solution is simple enough...you need more shaft skin!

One thing you can do is a reverse tug. While holding the head of your penis extended, pull the shaft skin back toward your pubic area and hold. Do this until you start to feel a little sore...not pain, mind you, just that stretching feeling.

Or you can try to do a little foreskin restoration. You can use T-tape or a tlc tugger or some other method to grow a little extra skin. I know you don't want full restoration yet, BBB, but if you want to get rid of the hairy shaft you can regrow a little skin...enough to cover your length gains and put everything back where its supposed to be.

Side note: I see from your stats that you have been doing some gaining. If you are tightly circumcised, you can also do some restoration and try to bring out some of the penile length being trapped in your abdominal cavity by lack of skin. It's well documented that many restorers gain up to an inch to an inch and a half length because their shaft skin was cut way too short and they did not have room to grow. A curved penis, hairy shaft and turkey neck and really, really tight shaft skin during erections are all good signs that you could gain some length with a light restoration program...even if you aren't going for the full thing!

Come check out my forum on foreskin restoration for ideas on how to do a partial restore, and get a little play in your shaft.

http://4skin.proboards19.com/index.cgi
 
Bump For Swank and Skepdick.

One of my original FR threads. I think I sound pretty level here. Nothing miraculous promised and both the pros and cons presented.

Where's that Krazy Kong you guys keep talking about here?
 
Back
Top Bottom