Tube sizes?

Slampocalypse

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
200
Ok so i was packing my first tube (for the most part, there were a few parts of the tube where i could see a part of the shaft that could expect a little more) and so i switched to my larger tube for the second set on. It was awesome and obviously allowed a little more expansion, plus i have a good amount of room to grow. here’s the thing, i noticed that in the large one, the curves in my shaft (simply inconsistencies in girth, pretty normal i think) were more pronounced in the larger one. Should i keep on with the smaller one and try to even out these inconsistencies or go for more girth? I want to put on some girth ASAP so I’m impatient but i don’t want to exaggerate girth inconsistency either. Granted i could just go for packing the new tube and even things out then, but truth told, i have very little idea what I’m doing. Thoughts?
 

DLD

doublelongdaddy
Staff member
Joined
Jun 3, 2003
Messages
109,468
Ok so i was packing my first tube (for the most part, there were a few parts of the tube where i could see a part of the shaft that could expect a little more) and so i switched to my larger tube for the second set on. It was awesome and obviously allowed a little more expansion, plus i have a good amount of room to grow. here’s the thing, i noticed that in the large one, the curves in my shaft (simply inconsistencies in girth, pretty normal i think) were more pronounced in the larger one. Should i keep on with the smaller one and try to even out these inconsistencies or go for more girth? I want to put on some girth ASAP so I’m impatient but i don’t want to exaggerate girth inconsistency either. Granted i could just go for packing the new tube and even things out then, but truth told, i have very little idea what I’m doing. Thoughts?
One way or the other right? What are the benefits and drawbacks? What is most important? For me it would be symmetry first, I would even out all inconsistencies before creating more girth. To me symmetry is important, I like things to be perspectivly even and correct. So I guess it comes down to what you want most.
 

Slampocalypse

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
200
I’m hardly worried about length . Like truly i want another inch, but if i ONLY gained girth by some fluke, i wouldn’t be too mad.

Definitely curious about how long it would take to have relatively even girth all around. So i guess the important question is will i actually pack the 2.25? That’s 7 inches around which is well beyond my goal, but obviously you’re going to be larger in the tube than real life. But it looks like you guys are probably right, if i don’t even out now, i might miss my chance
 

Slampocalypse

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
200
Let me try to describe this better just so I’m sure we are on the same page, the upper part of my shaft is a little thicker and it blocks off the tube and then the lower part there’s a feel little parts that don’t fully fill the tube. Is the pressure coming from the top going to be able to pull the sides out or is it just going to keep pulling the tip upwards? Sorry, I’m new.
 

REDZULU2003

Its a marathon, not a sprint!
Staff member
Joined
Jun 3, 2003
Messages
22,018
The base starts to pack the tube first, and it works up the shaft towards the head. Once the penis is uniformly packed in the tube, the pressure is primarily focused on the glans, stretching the penis in length .

This is why pumpers use a slimmer tube to pack for length goals.

Perhaps you could post a photo of it inside the tube?
 
Reactions: DLD

DLD

doublelongdaddy
Staff member
Joined
Jun 3, 2003
Messages
109,468
The base starts to pack the tube first, and it works up the shaft towards the head. Once the penis is uniformly packed in the tube, the pressure is primarily focused on the glans, stretching the penis in length .

This is why pumpers use a slimmer tube to pack for length goals.

Perhaps you could post a photo of it inside the tube?
👍🏽
 

Slampocalypse

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
200
Mine doesn’t happen quite like that. The base packs but so does the area right below the glans and down an inch or so. There’s a little area, especially on the left, that’s a little thinner. It doesn’t hit the wall right away. But today on my last two sets it started to, so i think this methodology is sound. I’m bummed that using the smaller tube won’t impact my overall growth as fast as I’d hoped, but I’m also excited at the prospect of achieving a more uniform growth, and working on length at the same time.

I suppose a reasonable way to approach it would be to squeeze any gains out of the first tube that i can, and if I’m not seeing or feeling results after a certain point, I’ve got my second tube to switch to
 

Slampocalypse

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
200
This morning i did 6-5-5-4. It seems to be working! Some dull ache in the part which needs girthening.

The tube estimates seem to estimate that i could feasibly reach 5.75 in the 2” tube, but i realized that may be for no sleeve ? I’ll keep trucking and keep y’all posted on my journey. Thanks for the help!
 

DLD

doublelongdaddy
Staff member
Joined
Jun 3, 2003
Messages
109,468
This morning i did 6-5-5-4. It seems to be working! Some dull ache in the part which needs girthening.

The tube estimates seem to estimate that i could feasibly reach 5.75 in the 2” tube, but i realized that may be for no sleeve? I’ll keep trucking and keep y’all posted on my journey. Thanks for the help!
So happy things are working out. Sounds as though your hitting all the right spots, that is the beauty of packin’ the tube, it will bring length and fill in where there is a lack of uniformity. Or as you coined 👍🏽😂 Girthening

Those tube estimates are without a sleeve . 😇
 
Top