New forum

WaxN

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Messages
454
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#1
This is a cool-looking forum, DLD.
 

WaxN

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Messages
454
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#3
thanx dewey, it's from a pic of me (mine)
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2003
Messages
19
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#4
I'm having trouble seeing your avatar right. If it's a pic of yours... it looks to me like the head is square!

I understand the rule against nudity. But I would think a small photo of just your penis would be an acceptable avatar.

In fact, it's strange, but when I see just the human penis and testicles, without the rest of the body, it doesn't look personal. It's more like a biological OBJECT - not really someone's privates.

With the "detacHydromaxent", it seems to me like it's not really nudity. It's not a guy's BODY. Just a human male "package" or specimen. Kinda like a lifelike rubber dildo.

Or, is it just me?
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2003
Messages
156
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#5
Originally posted by Salami

I understand the rule against nudity. But I would think a small photo of just your penis would be an acceptable avatar.
why is this being brought up? has someone complained?

i hope this isn't going to lead to the same image censorship that goes on at other (otherwise terrific) forums. i'm so fkkn sick of this.

it's a forum about COCK SIZE for christ's sake.

and if there are any married-with-children women checking in here to see what the men are up to, and they don't want to see such images, they should leave their avatar viewing setting turned off. if you have kids who use your computer, their ability to view these images is YOUR responsibility; use a filter or drop out, but don't impose your restrictions on those of us who are capable of viewing images of genitalia (male or female) without breaking down, freaking out, and going columbine.

sorry, but after seeing the way swm's 'cock appreciation group' imagery was dictated by a female member, i'm perturbed. i left his group for that reason. i don't want a den mother. i want pe coaches. i want freedom.

whew! sorry salami; you really hit a hot button.

dew
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2003
Messages
19
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#6
Dewey -

Sorry I got you going. I just like using a color photo of a cock, balls and bit of pubic scalp for my avatar. I use it in a couple of other men's web forums, and no complaints.
I made the gesture of first asking before posting the avatar here. The official response was that the penis, testicles and bit of pubic scalp is "too pornographic". I used to think that "pornography" is normally defined as something depicting sexual interaction between two or more people. Now, I guess it includes a photo of an isolated human penis and testicles, as if severed and on display.

Again, I didn't mean to stir something up. Just asking. Now I know. As least as far as these forums go.

-- Salami
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2003
Messages
156
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#7
Originally posted by Salami
Dewey -

Sorry I got you going.

-- Salami
I apologize actually, for going off like that. I wasn't aware of the discussion you've had already as it isn't in this thread.

It seems to me that any depiction of genitalia is acceptable if it's done in a graphic or abstract style as WaxN's excellent work exemplifies. I do understand that a throbbing, veined, purple-headed crank might be offensive to some.

Thanks for the clarification, and believe me, I don't want this to become an issue.
 

WaxN

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Messages
454
Likes
0
|
"New forum"
#8
Originally posted by dewey
It seems to me that any depiction of genitalia is acceptable if it's done in a graphic or abstract style as WaxN's excellent work exemplifies. I do understand that a throbbing, veined, purple-headed crank might be offensive to some.
Thanks.
 

samzman

Active member
Joined
Jul 13, 2003
Messages
2,220
Likes
5
|
"New forum"
#9
actually pornography technically is videotaping or pictures or whatever.....it is seeing the act itself.....like actually penetration or any type of sex acts.

i know that's not the technical definition but that's what i was told, i just don't have a dictionary right here in front of me.

so if anyone says on a Penis Enlargement forum that a picture of a dick is considered porno.....(where is the vagina or asshole or any other hole it is fuckin??? no where).....so if some lawyer or mumbo jumbo says that a pic of waxn's dick is PORNO. is blowing smoke up our asses.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top Bottom