Thanks, sik.
Odds are, if your woman has been with four or more men in the past, including you, one of them was uncircumcised.
The circ rate in the United States varies from 75 to 95 percent by region, with the deep south having the highest rates of circumcision and metropolitan areas having the lowest. In the west, particularly California, the rate has dropped to close to 50%. Things are changing, aares, as men become more educated about the true motivations behind circumcision-- which is money and reduction of sexual pleasure and function (a holdout of repressive religious doctrine). There are no benefits, period. These ideas you have concerning "bad" smell and "ugly" appearance are nothing more than brainwashing, designed to keep the circ industry running smooth and making plenty of money.
In a recent study, it was discovered that circumcision nets the hospital an extra $828 on average per child, including the procedure, medicines, follow up visits and medical care. Multiply this number by the amount of live male births in the United States and you get a staggering total figure...!
There have been countless studies on the harmful effects of circumcision, all showing real evidence of damage, both physical and psychological...almost all of them dismissed by the AMA because they do not want to abandon their profitable practice. The only caveat they published was a report saying that circumcision has no observable benefits.
If they admit that they have done harm to the millions of American men who were carved up at birth without informed consent, it would open them up to a bankrupting multitude of class action law suits!
Open your eyes, boys!
