S

swolejah

Guest
Hopefully there hasn't been a topic on this year, but is the size of a female or her rear end related to the size of her vagina? For instance, my ex-gf is about 5'2" at the most and she is pretty thin and her butt is pretty small. Would this mean that her vagina is really tight? And vice versa for girls who are larger and or have bigger bootays.
 
This has been brought up before, and most MoS members seem to think there is absolutely no relationship. I, however, think there is one. I don't see why there wouldn't be. Every single other body part tends to be larger on larger people. Taller girls tend to have longer legs, bigger heads, larger hands, larger feet, larger breasts.... Why wouldn't their vaginas work the same way?

A woman's vagina will not always coorespond directly to her height, hip size, waist, etc., but I believe overall that's the trend. I've had sex with taller, larger girls that were very tight and a smaller, shorter girl that was extremely loose. I think it works just like penis size. Some shorter men will have large penises and taller guys can have small ones, but I think the overall trend is that body part size tends to be consistent relative to body size. You'll never know how big a particular girl is til you get up inside her. ;)
 
I am absolutely head over heals for tall girls, the long legs drive me absolutely crazy. I am 5'9 and anything my height or better is extremely pleasureful, 6' or better is like hitting the lottery. I also like the bubble buts, huge buts, etc, for obvious reasons.

I have been lucky enough to have a few encounters with Tall girls and each one of them seemed to be small or normal.
I have only had a two bubble butts to date and both were comfortable roomy inside but this probably had more to do with the boyfriends they had in the past.

I think this issue would have a lot more to do with what size equipment the girl has been working with, the amount of milage she has been driven, and the resiliency of her conch. Also the more attractive girls are more likely to have MORE opportunity and logically MORE room in their cunts.
 
big-wish said:
I have been lucky enough to have a few encounters with Tall girls and each one of them seemed to be small or normal.
I have only had a two bubble butts to date and both were comfortable roomy inside but this probably had more to do with the boyfriends they had in the past.

I think this issue would have a lot more to do with what size equipment the girl has been working with, the amount of milage she has been driven, and the resiliency of her conch. Also the more attractive girls are more likely to have MORE opportunity and logically MORE room in their cunts.

The common belief is that the more dicks a girl has had or especially the more BIG dicks a girl has had, the more stretched out she'll be. I heard Dr. Drew on LoveLine talk about this, saying it doesn't work like that. The vagina size changes due to a large penis are only temporary. If a girl has a child and delivers vaginally, he said that the vagina will likely open up some. In my experience, I've seen some very tight, very slutty girls, and some other very prudish, very loose girls as well. Never boned a girl who's been pregnant yet though.
 
I would think vaginal size (not tightness) is relatively the same in most women because of reproductive reasons. Most children are relatively the same size at birth so one would think a woman's reproductive system would be the right size to accommodate this through evolution. I know that there are exception, as there are to everything, but it think this does hold some water.
 
I have always thought that the relationship here is about the same as in the male. If a man's size is related to penis size, then the vagina is related to a woman's size. I've been able to test this theory over the years, and can tell you it isn't related to the height of the woman or the width of her butt. However, black women versus white woman-- now, that's a different subject. As with men, women vary quite a bit. I'm thinking that the depth of their vagina can vary perhaps 3 inches, but what's difficult to measure is the angle and curve. That makes for a little different feel.

I think the most notable difference isn't the depth but the width. Some girls are pretty tight, but the more narrow ones might also be deeper. It depends, but less on how large a person they are.

All women like a hard-on that's long enough to hit their cervix on occassion, even though some of them claim it isn't necessary, they are just being generous. They will mostly settle for anything the guy has if they like him, but I've found they really love it when you get the thrust just right and are lightly bumping it, either each time, or every 3rd or 4th time.
 
Formysweetie said:
I have always thought that the relationship here is about the same as in the male. If a man's size is related to penis size, then the vagina is related to a woman's size. I've been able to test this theory over the years, and can tell you it isn't related to the height of the woman or the width of her butt. However, black women versus white woman-- now, that's a different subject. As with men, women vary quite a bit. I'm thinking that the depth of their vagina can vary perhaps 3 inches, but what's difficult to measure is the angle and curve. That makes for a little different feel.

I think the most notable difference isn't the depth but the width. Some girls are pretty tight, but the more narrow ones might also be deeper. It depends, but less on how large a person they are.

All women like a hard-on that's long enough to hit their cervix on occassion, even though some of them claim it isn't necessary, they are just being generous. They will mostly settle for anything the guy has if they like him, but I've found they really love it when you get the thrust just right and are lightly bumping it, either each time, or every 3rd or 4th time.

Every girl that I've been with screams in pain when I hit her cervix. Most find it uncomfortable to even bump it.
 
Just like penis size, vagina size is impossible to guess by looking at body sizes.
 
I always heard that the deeper a woman's voice, the deeper the cavity!!The more of a hollow space between her legs, results in a lower tonal range in her voice.
 
Ghosting said:



Yep, Age, height, weight, race, hip size, ass size, thigh size, how many babies, is not a factor at all, its just like us with our penis, you cant tell until you see for yourself.
 
Girthius said:
I always heard that the deeper a woman's voice, the deeper the cavity!!The more of a hollow space between her legs, results in a lower tonal range in her voice.


I know 2 petite girls with very high voices and huge vaginas.:O
 
This is my theory. Vagina size is directly related to the amount of use it is getting at the time. Examples. One girl I dated was a virgin. We only had sex a few times. It was almost unbearably tight. Another was pretty much a slut and me and a couple of other guys fucked her regularly. She was pretty loose and sloppy kind of like you would imagine screwing a glass of jelly might feel but it was nice. The last one is my wife. When we started dating she was slick and pretty tight. After a month of screwing her two or three times a night five or six times a week you could stick four fingers in her easily and probably could have stuck coke can in there pretty easily. After we got married the sex kind of tapered off to about once or twice a week. Now you can bearly get two fingers in her without her frowning. And I feel the difference when I put them in there. That's my theory. Any thoughts
 
Back
Top Bottom