BTW, this Italian fellow was the skinniest shit I ever did see. Is there a coorelation between thinness and big dicks?
 
I'm asian (e.g. chinese with a little bit of german) born with a stat of 7X5. What exactly is the average for east asian (e.g. chinese, korean, japanese, etc.)? My german side comes from my mom side, so how does race play a part in size? Since supposely (correct me if I'm wrong) penis size is herediate from your dad and not your mom. Maybe diet can play a role in size?
 
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, ���� stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into ����. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a ����� flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.
 
what we got to remember is that not all black people are the same there are many different tribes in africa, the same goes for asians. i think we generalize to much. also up until 100 years ago most white people-europeans (italians, greeks, croatians, germans etc.) would have married someone from there village or nieghbouring village. now that alot of those people have moved to america, australia, england-wherever shit gets all mixed up. in italy men from certain areas say sicily might be bigger then men from calabria (this example can be used for any country) but now people are fucking people from all over (mixed-marriage) that it's hard too say which race or tribe or area or village has big ones

^hope that makes sense

me i'm half italian half australian started 6 x 5.5 but my dad and uncle are 7 inches and over. talk about getting the short end of the stick

i personally think that everybodies the same, every race has it's large and small guys some races just have more guys that are large
 
Formysweetie said:
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, ���� stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into ����. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a ����� flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.

Nice post. Added to your rep points.
 
Formysweetie said:
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, ���� stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into ����. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a ����� flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.


ForMySweetie,

So according to your forumula, what should we shoot for in cubic inches?
 
Black average: 7x5.5
White average: 6x5
Asian average: 5X4.5

Thats my guess.. flame away :D
 
From everything that I know about this stuff, I believe that anywhere from 21.5 to 28 cubic inches is ideal. You can expand that a bit and say that 20-30 ci is great, but a little more than 20 and less than 30, is ideal. If you want to narrow it down even further, you can say 25-28 ci, but that's probably too large when considering all women out there. Fair enough? After all, there are some really tight pussies out there that would barely even be able to take the lower end of the ideal- and only with a ton of lube. Still, she'd cum like crazy with that kind of size.
goinfor11x7 said:
ForMySweetie,

So according to your forumula, what should we shoot for in cubic inches?
 
Thanks, Baraka. I'm just glad I've got my in-house cow pussy. Otherwise, I would be one frustrated camper.
 
goinfor11x7 said:
ForMySweetie,

So according to your forumula, what should we shoot for in cubic inches?

Well, everybody has a different "ideal," I think. Matter of fact, my own "ideal" cock has changed from what it used to be.

Come to think of it, my mate thinks I am almost painful sometimes because I get awfully thick, so I'd like to remain the same girth right now and increase length. Not just for photogenic effects (although we don't take pictures of ourselves), but because a long cock is really handy in more difficult positions. You can get into positions that an average dick could never reach deep enough to start bumping.

There's no such thing as "too long." That's adjustable. My mate just hangs onto it if she thinks it's going too deep. But too fat? Now, that's not a happy situation. If you hurt her, she's not going to want to even do it very much with you. But you can be careful with the depth and not plunge it in so deep and hard that you bruise her bladder. Some women are 2-3 inches deeper than others, too, and the angle is different. So the bigger your cock, the greater responsibility you have toward your lover, I think.

You'll know if all she wants to do is play with it, that maybe she's a little worried.

So my advice is this: There is no "ideal" of girth to length. There IS an ideal solid but comfortable girth. That's one that fills her width, and then get it as long as you like. How long? It partly depends on the woman or women you're with. Ask yourself, "What would be the ideal for the woman you like the most?" You can tell without asking her.

One other thing, too. Women like to see it, and it turns them on, lust like it turns you on! A bigger cock is a good deal, and a cock that's getting alrger and larger is an amazing sight to your woman. She will mention it a lot, and then you know you're making good time. If she starts complaining, just tell her maybe it's her imagination. Now it's time to SELL IT. Once she takes it and sees the advantages, she;ll be hooked. But just remember, there's a different limit for each woman. Don't go past her limit.
 
For what it is worth, I remember reading many moons ago that blacks were, on average, much more tumescent in the flaccid state than other races. It was suggested that this accounted for the stereotype, since large statistical samples suggest no or an an unrecognizable difference (to the naked eye) in the erect state.
 
i would agree that blacks are larger on average. not only because there flacid is larger on average, but because a larger portion of black man have big penises over 8". just looking at all the pictures i have seen, most of the really big cocks belong to black guys.
 
Being the owner of a black penis I will weigh in on this with my $0.02

I started Penis Enlargement at 7x5.5, which is a size that may have some shrinkage built in because I hadn't had sex in nearly four years.

After Penis Enlargementing for 6 weeks 5.75 of girth is what I measured before having to take a break due to a T-vein and some other health issues.

I have always felt my penis to be small and have shied away from much sex becuase of it. Being the smallest in my household at least is a flaccid state, (I never spied on my brothers erect penises). Also, HORRIFICALLY, it seems that ever other black penis in the shower room was bigger than mine.

As for which race has the biggest I cannot actually say. I know what the perceptions are and mine seem fit what the rest of the world thinks (which makes me feel small).

On an objective note ponder this:

(1) Most guys boast that Penis Enlargement is working because after gaining just 1/2 to 1 full inch all of a sudden their girlfriends are complaining of pain, discomfort, uteral tapping etc.

(2) Cross reference this against the studies that put black men to be on average only slightly larger than whites (read the same 1/2 to 1 inch mentioned above). And it is no wonder the perception may come from women (and other recievers of black cock), that they feel larger.

(3) In addition the larger flaccid state adds to the confusion/perception. I have scanned some anthopological information which suggest the larger flaccids would come from climatological differences. Warmer climates responsible for the development of larger noses, lips, and flaccids. Brethren white counterparts would have been doomed by these features in the colder climates due to more surface area exposure. Even the consistency of the nostrils was mentioned, in that the wider nostrils of blacks benefited by sucking in larger amounts of air to support the sprinting neccessary for survival in their habitat, on the other end of the coin these nostrils would have been ill fated consuming larger amounts of the frozen air of the northern climates. If you buy into this it may explain why some of the white men closer to the mediterranian also seem bigger as suggested in an earlier post.

Also, their is data to support that Austrailian men are hung even more so than black men on average. Austrailian men benifit from a warm climate however they haven't been there long enough for this type of anthropological change to take place. A strange anomoly however is that the Australian women seem to crave black men much more than any of the other European based women, this is ironic because they would seem to benefit least from sampling the chocolate. Go figure....

If I haven't shaken you yet, just wait until I stir your thoughts with the next stream of consciouness.

THE MANDIGO (made in the USA)

The is actually the truth about what my great grandmother expalined to me, she was born before the turn of the century and it was passed on to her from others. In any case here goes....

In the beggining of the slave trade the breeders wanted to get the best bang for their buck (no pun intended). What this meant is that not only did they need a guy to work tirelessly but also to reproduce more young bucks that would work tirelessly.
Take away the 600 years of common sense and academic intelligence we have gained since then and what you have is a handful of pale slave traders staring at naked black men, who might have perceived that longer cocks were more fertil and could make more babies. Because of the gestation of pregnancy, more seats needed to be given to the women which put even more pressure on picking the most fertil male slaves (the ones with the longest johnsons). (on a side note the black women with all that junk in the trunk, would have been percieved as more fertil due to their curves than other black women who may have been left behind [once again no pun intended]). Once in America after the slave traders finished their breeding cycles, the women would choose men based on natural selection to form families with, these men may not have been the same men that were so popular with the breeders. The reduction in breeding, abolition of slavery, natural selection based on attributes other than penis size would have eventually thinned out the ranks of the Mandigo.

This myth (of the __________) could easily be debunked by a comparison of black males in the Americas vs black males in Africa.

Bottom line for me is that race does not have nearly as much to due with penis size as does genetics. In other words white Mandigos could be created the same way the black mandigos were created. Hmmmm.... maybe if Hitler himself had a big cock he would have included this attribute in his plan for the master race, tsk, tsk what a pity.

In any case none of this really matters since DLD (the godfather of Penis Enlargement) has given us this exemplary method so that any of us can end up with a bigger penis. :)
 
Nice post from another perspective. That actually made a lot of sense to me.

*adds to your reputation*
 
big-wish said:
Being the owner of a black penis I will weigh in on this with my $0.02

I started Penis Enlargement at 7x5.5, which is a size that may have some shrinkage built in because I hadn't had sex in nearly four years.

After Penis Enlargementing for 6 weeks 5.75 of girth is what I measured before having to take a break due to a T-vein and some other health issues.

I have always felt my penis to be small and have shied away from much sex becuase of it. Being the smallest in my household at least is a flaccid state, (I never spied on my brothers erect penises). Also, HORRIFICALLY, it seems that ever other black penis in the shower room was bigger than mine.

As for which race has the biggest I cannot actually say. I know what the perceptions are and mine seem fit what the rest of the world thinks (which makes me feel small).

On an objective note ponder this:

(1) Most guys boast that Penis Enlargement is working because after gaining just 1/2 to 1 full inch all of a sudden their girlfriends are complaining of pain, discomfort, uteral tapping etc.

(2) Cross reference this against the studies that put black men to be on average only slightly larger than whites (read the same 1/2 to 1 inch mentioned above). And it is no wonder the perception may come from women (and other recievers of black cock), that they feel larger.

(3) In addition the larger flaccid state adds to the confusion/perception. I have scanned some anthopological information which suggest the larger flaccids would come from climatological differences. Warmer climates responsible for the development of larger noses, lips, and flaccids. Brethren white counterparts would have been doomed by these features in the colder climates due to more surface area exposure. Even the consistency of the nostrils was mentioned, in that the wider nostrils of blacks benefited by sucking in larger amounts of air to support the sprinting neccessary for survival in their habitat, on the other end of the coin these nostrils would have been ill fated consuming larger amounts of the frozen air of the northern climates. If you buy into this it may explain why some of the white men closer to the mediterranian also seem bigger as suggested in an earlier post.

Also, their is data to support that Austrailian men are hung even more so than black men on average. Austrailian men benifit from a warm climate however they haven't been there long enough for this type of anthropological change to take place. A strange anomoly however is that the Australian women seem to crave black men much more than any of the other European based women, this is ironic because they would seem to benefit least from sampling the chocolate. Go figure....

If I haven't shaken you yet, just wait until I stir your thoughts with the next stream of consciouness.

THE MANDIGO (made in the USA)

The is actually the truth about what my great grandmother expalined to me, she was born before the turn of the century and it was passed on to her from others. In any case here goes....

In the beggining of the slave trade the breeders wanted to get the best bang for their buck (no pun intended). What this meant is that not only did they need a guy to work tirelessly but also to reproduce more young bucks that would work tirelessly.
Take away the 600 years of common sense and academic intelligence we have gained since then and what you have is a handful of pale slave traders staring at naked black men, who might have perceived that longer cocks were more fertil and could make more babies. Because of the gestation of pregnancy, more seats needed to be given to the women which put even more pressure on picking the most fertil male slaves (the ones with the longest johnsons). (on a side note the black women with all that junk in the trunk, would have been percieved as more fertil due to their curves than other black women who may have been left behind [once again no pun intended]). Once in America after the slave traders finished their breeding cycles, the women would choose men based on natural selection to form families with, these men may not have been the same men that were so popular with the breeders. The reduction in breeding, abolition of slavery, natural selection based on attributes other than penis size would have eventually thinned out the ranks of the Mandigo.

This myth (of the __________) could easily be debunked by a comparison of black males in the Americas vs black males in Africa.

Bottom line for me is that race does not have nearly as much to due with penis size as does genetics. In other words white Mandigos could be created the same way the black mandigos were created. Hmmmm.... maybe if Hitler himself had a big cock he would have included this attribute in his plan for the master race, tsk, tsk what a pity.

In any case none of this really matters since DLD (the godfather of Penis Enlargement) has given us this exemplary method so that any of us can end up with a bigger penis. :)


very wise, very wise. this is a really intelligent post.

i'm australia and on the australia male thing are you talking about aboriginals. or are you talking about convicts. white people have been here since 1788 whereas aboriginals have been here for 40 000 years.
 
OS,

When I think of Aussie women, I am definitely thinking of the Sheilas, not the aboriginals. So the goes for the men.

No discredit to the aboriginals though, maybe someone should put them in a study to see where the fair out.

In any case maybe it is those dark skinned aboriginal men that have made the Sheilas all hot and bothered fro other black men. ;)
 
big-wish said:
Being the owner of a black penis I will weigh in on this with my $0.02

I started Penis Enlargement at 7x5.5, which is a size that may have some shrinkage built in because I hadn't had sex in nearly four years.

After Penis Enlargementing for 6 weeks 5.75 of girth is what I measured before having to take a break due to a T-vein and some other health issues.

I have always felt my penis to be small and have shied away from much sex becuase of it. Being the smallest in my household at least is a flaccid state, (I never spied on my brothers erect penises). Also, HORRIFICALLY, it seems that ever other black penis in the shower room was bigger than mine.

As for which race has the biggest I cannot actually say. I know what the perceptions are and mine seem fit what the rest of the world thinks (which makes me feel small).

On an objective note ponder this:

(1) Most guys boast that Penis Enlargement is working because after gaining just 1/2 to 1 full inch all of a sudden their girlfriends are complaining of pain, discomfort, uteral tapping etc.

(2) Cross reference this against the studies that put black men to be on average only slightly larger than whites (read the same 1/2 to 1 inch mentioned above). And it is no wonder the perception may come from women (and other recievers of black cock), that they feel larger.

(3) In addition the larger flaccid state adds to the confusion/perception. I have scanned some anthopological information which suggest the larger flaccids would come from climatological differences. Warmer climates responsible for the development of larger noses, lips, and flaccids. Brethren white counterparts would have been doomed by these features in the colder climates due to more surface area exposure. Even the consistency of the nostrils was mentioned, in that the wider nostrils of blacks benefited by sucking in larger amounts of air to support the sprinting neccessary for survival in their habitat, on the other end of the coin these nostrils would have been ill fated consuming larger amounts of the frozen air of the northern climates. If you buy into this it may explain why some of the white men closer to the mediterranian also seem bigger as suggested in an earlier post.

Also, their is data to support that Austrailian men are hung even more so than black men on average. Austrailian men benifit from a warm climate however they haven't been there long enough for this type of anthropological change to take place. A strange anomoly however is that the Australian women seem to crave black men much more than any of the other European based women, this is ironic because they would seem to benefit least from sampling the chocolate. Go figure....

If I haven't shaken you yet, just wait until I stir your thoughts with the next stream of consciouness.

THE MANDIGO (made in the USA)

The is actually the truth about what my great grandmother expalined to me, she was born before the turn of the century and it was passed on to her from others. In any case here goes....

In the beggining of the slave trade the breeders wanted to get the best bang for their buck (no pun intended). What this meant is that not only did they need a guy to work tirelessly but also to reproduce more young bucks that would work tirelessly.
Take away the 600 years of common sense and academic intelligence we have gained since then and what you have is a handful of pale slave traders staring at naked black men, who might have perceived that longer cocks were more fertil and could make more babies. Because of the gestation of pregnancy, more seats needed to be given to the women which put even more pressure on picking the most fertil male slaves (the ones with the longest johnsons). (on a side note the black women with all that junk in the trunk, would have been percieved as more fertil due to their curves than other black women who may have been left behind [once again no pun intended]). Once in America after the slave traders finished their breeding cycles, the women would choose men based on natural selection to form families with, these men may not have been the same men that were so popular with the breeders. The reduction in breeding, abolition of slavery, natural selection based on attributes other than penis size would have eventually thinned out the ranks of the Mandigo.

This myth (of the __________) could easily be debunked by a comparison of black males in the Americas vs black males in Africa.

Bottom line for me is that race does not have nearly as much to due with penis size as does genetics. In other words white Mandigos could be created the same way the black mandigos were created. Hmmmm.... maybe if Hitler himself had a big cock he would have included this attribute in his plan for the master race, tsk, tsk what a pity.

In any case none of this really matters since DLD (the godfather of Penis Enlargement) has given us this exemplary method so that any of us can end up with a bigger penis. :)
Interesting concept you have there man. Except Hitler didn't really fit many of the attributes he found to be so important or ideal. He wasn't very sturdy or athletic. He wasn't blonde haired, and blue eyed (damn just realized how "aryan" I am lol), and he was apparently half Jewish if memory serves. So I don't really know why that matters at all just thought I would point that out. Maybe Hitler was packin'??? Nah I doubt it. Too bad Dld wasn't around In the 1930's, then Hitler could have gotten to the source of his psychosis and expand his member instead of his empire :s ...
(p.s. not trying to make light of the Holocaust, and other such atrocities)
 
big-wish said:
OS,

When I think of Aussie women, I am definitely thinking of the Sheilas, not the aboriginals. So the goes for the men.

No discredit to the aboriginals though, maybe someone should put them in a study to see where the fair out.

In any case maybe it is those dark skinned aboriginal men that have made the Sheilas all hot and bothered fro other black men. ;)

for some reason the myth dosen't apply for aboriginals even though they are black/dark skinned.

i'm guessing you've been to australia before. best country on earth if i don't say so myself. i'm also guessing you got pretty lucky here aswell
 
Back
Top Bottom