- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Messages
- 325
To me, any study which states averaged girth to exceed averaged length loses credibility right from the start. I mean, come on, that's ridiculous. How many guys on this board have more girth than length????
And in terms of self-measurement, how else do you expect it to be done? I'm sorry, but I could not maintain a raging erection while some old fart researcher handled it, placed a ruler next to it, then wrapped a measuring tape around it.
I'll give you one more thing to chew on: To my suprise, most of these studies are NBP!!! In fact, almost all of them are. I focus on BP, because I feel I can get more measurements consistently that way, and my measurement doesn't fluctuate with my bodyweight. However, I've read study after study which gives measurement directions which clearly correspond with NBP. And the Kinsey measurement with a flimsy index card obviously had to be NBP as well....or just try shoving an index card deeply into your pubis.
I'm not saying all this to be argumentative, I'm simply trying to be objective. If you think that most guys are thicker than they are long, or that they only average 5" in length, so be it. I'll say you're possibly in for a rude awakening. But we have Penis Enlargement, so no need to kid ourselves.
One more thing, from 1985-87, I was a bouncer at a very hot Pittsburgh nightclub. I worked Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays (& Sundays were Under 21 nights). In just over 2 years, I worked over 400 shifts there....and snagged quite a bit of pussy. At the time I was 6.5 (BPenis EnlargementL) x 5.2 (midshaft), yet I never once had a gal comment on my length.
but true.
I had gals tell me, "Ooh, a thickie!" (at 5.2, imagine that). Yet none ever said I was long. Yet, according to that cracked study, my girth was slighly under average, but my length was almost 1.5" more - the exact opposite of all the female feedback I ever got (noteworthy girth, ho-hum length).....yeah.............RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.
And in terms of self-measurement, how else do you expect it to be done? I'm sorry, but I could not maintain a raging erection while some old fart researcher handled it, placed a ruler next to it, then wrapped a measuring tape around it.
I'll give you one more thing to chew on: To my suprise, most of these studies are NBP!!! In fact, almost all of them are. I focus on BP, because I feel I can get more measurements consistently that way, and my measurement doesn't fluctuate with my bodyweight. However, I've read study after study which gives measurement directions which clearly correspond with NBP. And the Kinsey measurement with a flimsy index card obviously had to be NBP as well....or just try shoving an index card deeply into your pubis.
I'm not saying all this to be argumentative, I'm simply trying to be objective. If you think that most guys are thicker than they are long, or that they only average 5" in length, so be it. I'll say you're possibly in for a rude awakening. But we have Penis Enlargement, so no need to kid ourselves.
One more thing, from 1985-87, I was a bouncer at a very hot Pittsburgh nightclub. I worked Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays (& Sundays were Under 21 nights). In just over 2 years, I worked over 400 shifts there....and snagged quite a bit of pussy. At the time I was 6.5 (BPenis EnlargementL) x 5.2 (midshaft), yet I never once had a gal comment on my length.
but true.I had gals tell me, "Ooh, a thickie!" (at 5.2, imagine that). Yet none ever said I was long. Yet, according to that cracked study, my girth was slighly under average, but my length was almost 1.5" more - the exact opposite of all the female feedback I ever got (noteworthy girth, ho-hum length).....yeah.............RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.
Last edited:
