Nolove

0
Registered
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
267
Here is a large data base That was released today.

I know people have a phobia of small penis syndrome, maybe a large reason why they're on this site.


So look no further on other sites MOS got you covered!

Note- Sized are based in BPEL

https://worldpenis.tadaa-data.de/index.html

https://blog.jemu.name/post/2015/08/i-analyzed-some-world-penis-data---because-why-not/

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15


I will screen cap the photos for graphs, just wait accordingly.
 
Last edited:
Nolove;718264 said:
Here is a large data base That was released today.

I know people have a phobia of small penis syndrome, maybe a large reason why they're on this site.


So look no further on other sites MOS got you covered!

Note- Sized are based in BPEL

https://worldpenis.tadaa-data.de/index.html

https://blog.jemu.name/post/2015/08/i-analyzed-some-world-penis-data---because-why-not/

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15


I will screen cap the photos for graphs, just wait accordingly.

Nice nice. For the first webiste I checked the biggest and its 17.9cm (7 inches) Not as big as you think and Penis enlargement will definitely help you reach that point.
 
kyomoto;718265 said:
Nice nice. For the first webiste I checked the biggest and its 17.9cm (7 inches) Not as big as you think and Penis enlargement will definitely help you reach that point.


yep and thats BPEL , give or take a nbpel of around 6inches.
 
So much effort put into this study, definitely worth the review!
 
IAmSpartacus71;718516 said:
Question: Did they measure circumference in the middle of the shaft or base?

They have different measurements but I'm assuming for the circumference they measured mid shaft.
 
kyomoto;718552 said:
They have different measurements but I'm assuming for the circumference they measured mid shaft.

It wasn't touched-on specifically on either MSEG or BEG, they said it was one or the other...kinda guessing they chose whichever value was higher
 
Big Schwanz Acht;718557 said:
It wasn't touched-on specifically on either MSEG or BEG, they said it was one or the other...kinda guessing they chose whichever value was higher

It would make more sense to do MSEG rather base because MSEG is what you can mainly see and use when having sex
 
Nolove;718264 said:
Here is a large data base That was released today.

I know people have a phobia of small penis syndrome, maybe a large reason why they're on this site.


So look no further on other sites MOS got you covered!

Note- Sized are based in BPEL

https://worldpenis.tadaa-data.de/index.html

https://blog.jemu.name/post/2015/08/i-analyzed-some-world-penis-data---because-why-not/

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15


I will screen cap the photos for graphs, just wait accordingly.

my girth isnt human its not even on the charts lol. lets get bigger than the charts!
 
kyomoto;718564 said:
It would make more sense to do MSEG rather base because MSEG is what you can mainly see and use when having sex

That only occurs in ���� because they need a good shot of the action but you dont no because you are a Virgo . the real reason is ecause the base skin could get in the way becauseits thicker
 
templnite;718569 said:
That only occurs in ���� because they need a good shot of the action but you dont no because you are a Virgo . the real reason is ecause the base skin could get in the way becauseits thicker

Wouldn't make sense to measure something close to fat pad.
 
kyomoto;718609 said:
Wouldn't make sense to measure something close to fat pad.

That would be a bad measurement as how much of the base if the penis is engaged in sex? Almost none. Midshaft would be the best measurement.
 
doublelongdaddy;718648 said:
That would be a bad measurement as how much of the base if the penis is engaged in sex? Almost none. Midshaft would be the best measurement.

Exactly. That's what I said and makes the most sense. Still the research needs to be clarified and detailed regardless.
 
Sorry, i didnt see anything on MSEG or BG. However, numerous studies did indeed use mseg specially condom brand researches.
 
The first two links are based on a dataset that's wildly inaccurate.

The third one looks interesting but there's very few BPEL measurements.
 
Szy;718807 said:
The first two links are based on a dataset that's wildly inaccurate.

The third one looks interesting but there's very few BPEL measurements.

What makes the first two links inaccurate if you could explain please?
 
Nolove;718789 said:
Sorry, i didnt see anything on MSEG or BG. However, numerous studies did indeed use mseg specially condom brand researches.

Every study will miss something or another, how I deal with these things is with averages against other studies to find what is missing and what may be incorrect. Having a host of studies is best and making comparisons in that way. Still, this was a well thought out and very professional study.
 
I always have trouble believing any of these datasets and Studies on Penis size. It seems to only fuck with most men's psyche about their own size and create insecurities and self-esteem issues. Personally, I don't care what size the other guy's dick is, it can't serve my sexually purpose for two reasons. I'm not gay, nor am I a woman. It's like being 5-foot tall and in all other countries, men are 6-foot tall, it doesn't change who you are, you're still 5-foot tall. The only difference is, we can change the size of our dicks with PE and that's what you should be focusing on. Improving ourselves, not comparing our dicks to the other 2+ billion men in the world. Besides, the information is based on a collection of data, which none of us really know how accurate it truly can be.
 
Threak-X;718941 said:
I always have trouble believing any of these datasets and Studies on Penis size. It seems to only fuck with most men's psyche about their own size and create insecurities and self-esteem issues. Personally, I don't care what size the other guy's dick is, it can't serve my sexually purpose for two reasons. I'm not gay, nor am I a woman. It's like being 5-foot tall and in all other countries, men are 6-foot tall, it doesn't change who you are, you're still 5-foot tall. The only difference is, we can change the size of our dicks with PE and that's what you should be focusing on. Improving ourselves, not comparing our dicks to the other 2+ billion men in the world. Besides, the information is based on a collection of data, which none of us really know how accurate it truly can be.

Very true and the reason I have to sort through hundreds of studies to be able to give some sort of coherent information. The best information on penis size, averages and racial differences are found here, in the Brotherhood.
 
Here is a large data base That was released today.

I know people have a phobia of small penis syndrome, maybe a large reason why they're on this site.


So look no further on other sites MOS got you covered!

Note- Sized are based in BPEL

https://worldpenis.tadaa-data.de/index.html

https://blog.jemu.name/post/2015/08/i-analyzed-some-world-penis-data---because-why-not/

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15


I will screen cap the photos for graphs, just wait accordingly.

Both of the URL are broken
 
Back
Top Bottom