Are Circumcised Men Smaller?

Are Circumcised Men Smaller?

  • cut and 5" to 6"

    Votes: 12 17.6%
  • cut and 6" to 7"

    Votes: 15 22.1%
  • cut and 7" to 8"

    Votes: 16 23.5%
  • cut and 8" to 9"

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • cut and 9" to 10"

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am DLD ;)

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • uncut and 5" to 6"

    Votes: 4 5.9%
  • uncut and 6" to 7"

    Votes: 8 11.8%
  • uncut and 7" to 8"

    Votes: 5 7.4%
  • uncut and 8" to 9"

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • uncut and 9" to 10"

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • uncut and 10" +

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    68

kong1971

1
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
2,388
One last poll. I have read in a couple places that uncircumcised men are generally larger than circumcised men. I have heard of circumcision being called "penis reduction surgery" many times and want to know how true that is.
 
I don't see how extra skin affects anything.Genetics, however, do. I'm uncircumsised by the way.
 
Ummmm....yeah. And if you cut your baby's legs off at birth he'll still be the same height, too, right?
 
kong1971 said:
One last poll. I have read in a couple places that uncircumcised men are generally larger than circumcised men. I have heard of circumcision being called "penis reduction surgery" many times and want to know how true that is.
Just so you know what results you are getting, do you want to know Pre or Post Penis Enlargement? I would think you would want to know Pre Penis Enlargement.
 
It's pretty widely accepted that uncut men are bigger, as far as my reading goes, but I wonder what the actually differences are, on average. Half an inch? 2 inches? That's what I want to see.
 
Yeah, that may skew the results. Pre-Penis Enlargement and foreskin restoration, I was 5.5" and very tightly cut. Now I am 7.5" and slightly looser. So the answers should be pre-Penis Enlargement, before any form of body modification took place. Thanks, Tennis, for pointing that out!
 
kong1971 said:
Yeah, that may skew the results. Pre-Penis Enlargement and foreskin restoration, I was 5.5" and very tightly cut. Now I am 7.5" and slightly looser. So the answers should be pre-Penis Enlargement, before any form of body modification took place. Thanks, Tennis, for pointing that out!
You're welcome -- most should have figured that out, but maybe not. Now I am wondering cut v. uncut -- who experiences the most gains?
 
I think there is already a poll going on for that. Hey, Zurik, why didn't you post your pre-Penis Enlargement size. You are uncut. What did you start with?
 
"And if you cut your baby's legs off at birth he'll still be the same height, too, right"
There's a difference between a forskin and a bone, now isn't there?
 
kong1971 said:
I think there is already a poll going on for that. Hey, Zurik, why didn't you post your pre-Penis Enlargement size. You are uncut. What did you start with?
I wasn't sure and was too lazy to check.
 
Zurik said:
"And if you cut your baby's legs off at birth he'll still be the same height, too, right"
There's a difference between a forskin and a bone, now isn't there?

Its all relative wouldn't you say? The legs are, what, 30% of the entire mass of the body, while the foreskin is 50% of the mass of the penis. I'm sorry you don't feel the same way I do about this issue, but I would probably say that, since you are uncircumcised, you don't really know what problems a cut guy goes through because of this needless surgery.

Me, I have turkey neck, stretch marks, a really thick C-scar that doesn't like to be stretched and pulled on as well as a curved penis. I also had my frenelum removed too. Next time you are enjoying sex, imagine enjoying it without that slippery sliding skin-- oh, and your fren-- Oh, and like 90% of the sensation in your glans.
 
Kong Id say Zurik is right, Legs and foreskin cannot be made as a comparison.
 
Hmmm....I guess you're right.

Foreskin provides...."gliding motion" during intercourse, extra skin for big, hard erections, protection of the glans from irritants, secretion of antibiotics to protect the penis from disease, emollients to keep glans moist and supple, and pheromones to attract mates. It provides sexual pleasure so that a being wants to procreate, and do it often. It even have estrogen receptors...doctors don't even know WHAT they're for, as well as testosterone producing glands (I have a feeling it has something to do with male-female bonding-- one needing what the other's body produces).

Legs provide...um, walking...

Nope. No comparison.

Seriously, men, stop thinking it's a useless flap of skin! You don't know how important it is! Until we stop letting them brainwash us into thinking our sex organ is mostly useless, they're going to keep butchering us and our male children.
 
kong1971 said:
Hmmm....I guess you're right.

Foreskin provides...."gliding motion" during intercourse, extra skin for big, hard erections, protection of the glans from irritants, secretion of antibiotics to protect the penis from disease, emollients to keep glans moist and supple, and pheromones to attract mates. It provides sexual pleasure so that a being wants to procreate, and do it often. It even have estrogen receptors...doctors don't even know WHAT they're for, as well as testosterone producing glands (I have a feeling it has something to do with male-female bonding-- one needing what the other's body produces).

Legs provide...um, walking...

Nope. No comparison.

Seriously, men, stop thinking it's a useless flap of skin! You don't know how important it is! Until we stop letting them brainwash us into thinking our sex organ is mostly useless, they're going to keep butchering us and our male children.

This Butchering @ birth thankfully doesnt occur here in the UK.
I read another post you said that the Lighter bit of the skin under the head is the skin which produces mucous glans?
Let me get that right its the LIGHTER colour patch of skin under the head right?
if so i have around 2 inches of this skin!! so a good chance of producing mucous.
 
Very good chance! That is the good stuff, Executioner! The more you have the better off you are as far as restoring, as you will be better able to get back most of its functionality. I have about two inches of mucosal tissue, and have had very good results as far as secretions and sensitivity. The only thing I got fucked on was the frenelum (the most sensitive part of the penis...kind of like the male clit) Mine was totally removed, although a few peices exist here and there on the underside in little tags and buds...bastard doctors...they clipped the top side pretty neatly and I have had little problems there, but the bottom side of my penis is a nasty, scarred mess, probably why I have turkey neck so bad.
 
Last edited:
kong1971 said:
Very good chance! That is the good stuff, Executioner! The more you have the better off you are as far as restoring, as you will be better able to get back most of its functionality. I have about two inches of mucosal tissue, and have had very good results as far as secretions and sensitivity. The only thing I got fucked on was the frenelum (the most sensitive part of the penis...kind of like the male clit) Mine was totally removed, although a few peices exist here and there on the underside in little tags and buds...bastard doctors...they clipped the top side pretty neatly and I have had little problems there, but the bottom side of my penis is a nasty, scarred mess, probably why I have turkey neck so bad.

This sounds great how long did you say it took before Mucous would start to form while having the light skin in contact with the head for?
As far as i can see my frenulum is sorta half there, bastards did a messy job with mine.
 
After about 5 weeks, I stayed t-taped for almost 16 hours one day. I took it off to wash and use the bathroom and noticed a thin film which I took to be smegma or the precursor of it. Normally, if I stay covered now for several hours at a time, I notice the head is slightly moist. I've been doing FR for 2 months now, and have gone from very tight to having a loose roll of skin behind the glans.
 
This sounds great man, its just having to wear something throughout the day that puts me off, and the amount of time its gonna take the thought just deters me.
 
i know...but once you get in the habit of wearing it all day, it's not so bad... still, when i hit the john the other night and saw the skin just starting to move up over the glans, i got excited...once it starts to roll over on its own, its all downhill, from what i heard...nothing holding it back
 
Back
Top Bottom