Recent content by Vaseline_Knight

I have one that points to the northWest... (which is to the left and up). when I'm 90% I'm straight and I look alot bigger than when I am 100% with the curve.. but then again that's from my point of bird's eye view from the top. I don't think from below an upward curve looks bigger...

then he clearly is a douchebag.. I think I need to attend a douchebag rehab clinic.. *cough* douchebag *cough* =( addiction sucks..

Red you douchebag, stop going to old threads and bumping them up with comments.. lol I get an email from MOS and I get excited to read about some breakthrough you've had and log on to read about it only to find a douchebag comment in a douchebag forum in a douchebag obama world.. what an...

That in no way represents the 'less is more' concept. To the body, both of those are actions which merit an inflammatory response. In short, you will quickly get overtrained. My 2 cents anyways. VKay

no I didn't take propecia. A friend of mine did and had alot of problems with erection quality during sex and I care more about Penis Enlargement than my hair so I wanted to keep DHT levels up. Propecia inhibits 5 alpha reductase so it basically stops the major portion of DHT conversion from...

hey friend. I was in the same situation as you. I had a receding hair line and the density of hair was rapidly decreasing. I went as far as consulting with a hair transplant doctor to somehow stop the recession before it happened. I even got a prescription for propecia from my doctor...

no bud, you weren't the one I was referring to, although your methods are quite extreme, you are far from dogmatic, and from what I know you've never tried making a profit from preaching your ways. As I said, I have nothing against any of the members here. Just stating in this forum...

Well if this comment is directed towards me, (and I assume it is based on the fact that you have chosen to look at Clamping from the scientific stand point, rather than the dogmatic point of view of 'no pain no gain' (which is backed by the gains of some lucky members on these boards... and some...

I'm listening.. But I'm stupid and I can't make the connection between VEGF, and Cavernosa smooth muscle growth

A long Gruesome way to say "I KNEW IT!!!!!!!!!" and "I TOLD YOU SO".. Glad you saw through her, best of luck with your new gf.

A sure way to get rid of the scar is to get some Topical Verapamil and apply it. You can find Topical Verapamil on the internet somewhere just search it. Verapamil is a Calcium Chanel blocker which will 'dissolve' scar tissue (which is basically a random, disorganized formation of Type I...

Hey Swm, My appologies. Since you posted a supportive statement after Mr.9x7.5's comment about 30 + min sessions, I assumed, that you were backing up his theory. I'm not 'anti-clamping' per-se. I'm just against 'extreme' exercises that have been advocated by some users, including you...

No. It does not. Light constriction, is not accompanied with most of the negative side effects I mentioned. The induced hydrostatic pressure is not that much higher than the intrinsic osmotic pressure and lymphatic vessels are not 100% constricted, so edema happens at a much slower rate...

I agree with you on that. Different people do respond to different Penis Enlargement regiments. But are you saying that you support the idea of clamping being effective only if it consists of 30 minute clamping sessions? Even when I was clamping rigoursly I don't think I could go past...

hahaha Even better than the one liners with authoriative tones, are the ones that propse something dangerous like this one. I wrote quite a large post regarding this thread but by the time I went to post it, the browser had logged me out and all of my smart ass remarks were lost to the sea...